Quantum error correction comes from the marriage of quantum mechanics with the theory of error-correcting codes, which is still at the rudimentary stage tackling only 1 qubit to date. As, unlike the classical world, the extent of error in the quantum world is substantially high and unavoidable, scaling up the quantum error correction from 1 qubit to higher is of utmost significane. Therefore, to achive the scaling up, we present a general quantum error correction code that can be adapted for any number of quantum errors (bit-flip error to be specific in our case). This generalized code for bit-flip error correction realizes a delicate blending of using controlled-NOT gates with the notion of quantum entanglement. We augment the blending with majority voting in the final stage of the error correction. We demonstrate efficacy of our proposed error correction code through real experimentation in IBM Qiskit. Our experimental results up to 3-qubit bit-flip errors in the available Qiskit infrastructure confirm a total escape from errors using our proposed error correction code.
Quantum error correction comes from the marriage of quantum mechanics with the theory of error-correcting codes, which is still at the rudimentary stage tackling only 1 qubit to date. As, unlike the classical world, the extent of error in the quantum world is substantially high and unavoidable, scaling up the quantum error correction from 1 qubit to higher is of utmost significane. Therefore, to achive the scaling up, we present a general quantum error correction code that can be adapted for any number of quantum errors (bit-flip error to be specific in our case). This generalized code for bit-flip error correction realizes a delicate blending of using controlled-NOT gates with the notion of quantum entanglement. We augment the blending with majority voting in the final stage of the error correction. We demonstrate efficacy of our proposed error correction code through real experimentation in IBM Qiskit. Our experimental results up to 3-qubit bit-flip errors in the available Qiskit infrastructure confirm a total escape from errors using our proposed error correction code.
Quantum systems operate using quantum bits (qubits), which are highly sensitive to external noises and disturbances and they are easily prone to errors. In the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, these errors make difficult to build reliable, fault tolerant quantum circuits for real world deployment. This work provides an overview of need for Quantum Error Correction (QEC) in NISQ devices, as qubits commonly get affected by bit-flip, phase-flip, and combined errors that degrades system performance and examines Quantum Error Correction Code (QECC) techniques usage in communication, computation, and quantum multimedia applications such as image and video transmission. In addition, a simple three-qubit repetition circuit is introduced to demonstrate an error-mitigation approach. These findings, also show how QEC improves fidelity, reduces logical errors, and improves noise tolerance. The analysis also identifies challenges and outlines the future research direction aimed at achieving efficient and scalable fault tolerant quantum circuits.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Quantum systems operate using quantum bits (qubits), which are highly sensitive to external noises and disturbances and they are easily prone to errors. In the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, these errors make difficult to build reliable, fault tolerant quantum circuits for real world deployment. This work provides an overview of need for Quantum Error Correction (QEC) in NISQ devices, as qubits commonly get affected by bit-flip, phase-flip, and combined errors that degrades system performance and examines Quantum Error Correction Code (QECC) techniques usage in communication, computation, and quantum multimedia applications such as image and video transmission. In addition, a simple three-qubit repetition circuit is introduced to demonstrate an error-mitigation approach. These findings, also show how QEC improves fidelity, reduces logical errors, and improves noise tolerance. The analysis also identifies challenges and outlines the future research direction aimed at achieving efficient and scalable fault tolerant quantum circuits.
We develop a classical bit-flip correction method to mitigate measurement errors on quantum computers. This method can be applied to any operator, any number of qubits, and any realistic bit-flip probability. We first demonstrate the successful performance of this method by correcting the noisy measurements of the ground-state energy of the longitudinal Ising model. We then generalize our results to arbitrary operators and test our method both numerically and experimentally on IBM quantum hardware. As a result, our correction method reduces the measurement error on the quantum hardware by up to one order of magnitude. We finally discuss how to preprocess the method and extend it to other error sources beyond measurement errors. For local Hamiltonians, the overhead costs are polynomial in the number of qubits, even if multiqubit correlations are included.
Quantum noise cannot be avoided in the quantum computing devices due to unstable nature of qubits and signals. The error caused by quantum noise can be detected and corrected using different error correcting codes. In this work, we have tested the feasibility and accuracy of three qubit bit flip and phase flip error correcting code in quantum computer provided by International Business Machine Quantum Experience (IBM QX) cloud platform. Among five quantum processors, ibmq_ourense is found to have highest average accuracy 77.9% ± 3.09% on all qubits simultaneously. Three qubits bit flip error correction circuit gave correct output 89.9% ± 1.01% of the time on average. Similarly three qubits phase flip error correction circuit give 88.05% ±1.89%. The measurement error mitigation has improved the accuracy of bit flip and phase flip error correction code by 5.01% and 7.01% respectively on average. The error rate shows that the error in quantum computations are random in nature and can be corrected. IBM QX quantum computer are suitable for only small scale quantum computation and demonstrate purpose. Furthermore, the accuracy of error correction codes can be increased with the use of higher accuracy quantum qubits and quantum gates.