Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superselection from canonical constraints

Michael J. W. Hall

Published Jan 1, 2004• 9 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The evolution of both quantum and classical ensembles may be described via the probability density P on configuration space, its canonical conjugate S, and an_ensemble_ Hamiltonian H[P,S]. For quantum ensembles this evolution is, of course, equivalent to the Schroedinger equation for the wavefunction, which is linear. However, quite simple constraints on the canonical fields P and S correspond to_nonlinear_ constraints on the wavefunction. Such constraints act to prevent certain superpositions of wavefunctions from being realised, leading to superselection-type rules. Examples leading to superselection for energy, spin-direction and `classicality' are given. The canonical formulation of the equations of motion, in terms of a probability density and its conjugate, provides a universal language for describing classical and quantum ensembles on both continuous and discrete configuration spaces, and is briefly reviewed in an appendix.

Related papers

Superselection from canonical constraints

Michael J. W. Hall

The evolution of both quantum and classical ensembles may be described via the probability density P on configuration space, its canonical conjugate S, and an_ensemble_ Hamiltonian H[P,S]. For quantum ensembles this evolution is, of course, equivalent to the Schroedinger equation for the wavefunction, which is linear. However, quite simple constraints on the canonical fields P and S correspond to_nonlinear_ constraints on the wavefunction. Such constraints act to prevent certain superpositions of wavefunctions from being realised, leading to superselection-type rules. Examples leading to superselection for energy, spin-direction and `classicality' are given. The canonical formulation of the equations of motion, in terms of a probability density and its conjugate, provides a universal language for describing classical and quantum ensembles on both continuous and discrete configuration spaces, and is briefly reviewed in an appendix.

arXiv:quant-ph/0404123•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 22, 2004•14 citations

Interacting classical and quantum ensembles

Michael J. W. Hall, Marcel Reginatto

A consistent description of interactions between classical and quantum systems is relevant to quantum measurement theory and to calculations in quantum chemistry and quantum gravity. A solution is offered here to this long-standing problem, based on a universally applicable formalism for ensembles on configuration space. This approach overcomes difficulties arising in previous attempts and in particular allows for a back reaction on the classical ensemble, conservation of probability and energy, and the correct classical equations of motion in the limit of no interaction. Applications include automatic decoherence for quantum ensembles interacting with classical measurement apparatuses, a generalization of coherent states to hybrid harmonic oscillators, and an equation for describing the interaction of quantum matter fields with classical gravity, which implies that the radius of a Robertson-Walker universe containing a quantum massive scalar field can be sharply defined only for particular ``quantized'' values.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509134•Physical Review A•Dec 9, 2005•106 citations

The Quantum Mechanical Density Operator And Its Time Evolution: Quantum Dynamics Using The Quantum Liouville Equation

Abraham Nitzan

The starting point of the classical description of motion is the Newton equations that yield a phase space trajectory (rN (t), pN (t)) for a given initial condition (rN (0), pN (0)). Alternatively one may describe classical motion in the framework of the Liouville equation (Section (1.2.2)) that describes the time evolution of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t). For a closed system fully described in terms of a well specified initial condition, the two descriptions are completely equivalent. Probabilistic treatment becomes essential in reduced descriptions that focus on parts of an overall system, as was demonstrated in Sections 5.1–5.3 for equilibrium systems, and in Chapters 7 and 8 that focus on the time evolution of classical systems that interact with their thermal environments. This chapter deals with the analogous quantum mechanical problem. Within the limitations imposed by its nature as expressed, for example, by Heisenbergtype uncertainty principles, the Schrödinger equation is deterministic. Obviously it describes a deterministic evolution of the quantum mechanical wavefunction. The analog of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t) is now the quantum mechanical density operator (often referred to as the “density matrix”), whose time evolution is determined by the quantum Liouville equation. Again, when the system is fully described in terms of a well specified initial wavefunction, the two descriptions are equivalent. The density operator formalism can, however, be carried over to situations where the initial state of the system is not well characterized and/or a reduced description of part of the overall system is desired. Such situations are considered later in this chapter.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Apr 6, 2006•1 citation

Quantum ensembles and the density matrix

Mark E. Tuckerman

Abstract Chapter 10 introduces the concept of quantum ensembles and their descrption via the ensemble density matrix. The chapter begins by setting up the quantum manybody problem and demonstrating the difficulty in solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the energy eigenvalues of a manybody Hamiltonian. This naturally leads to the concept of quantum ensembles and their formulation in terms of the density matrix. Eigenvalues of the density matrx are shown to represent probabilities associated with the quantum states that constitute the ensemble. The time-dependence of the density matrix is shown to be determined by the quantum Liouville equation. The quantum Liouville equation is solved under equilibrium conditions, and the solutions are shown to commute with the Hamiltonian. Thus, the eigenvalues of the solution are shown give the probabilities associated with different energy levels. Quantum partition functions in different ensembles are derived from these eigenvalues. Finally, the quantum analog of entropy maximization is used to derive the quantum canonical ensemble.

•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

Geometry and Statistics of Ehrenfest dynamics

José L. Alonso, Alberto Castro, Jesús Clemente-Gallardo +3 more

Quantum dynamics (e.g., the Schrödinger equation) and classical dynamics (e.g., Hamilton equations) can both be formulated in equal geometric terms: a Poisson bracket defined on a manifold. The difference between both worlds is due to the presence of extra structure in the quantum case, that leads to the appearance of the probabilistic nature of the measurements and the indetermination and superposition principles. In this paper we first show that the quantum-classical dynamics prescribed by the Ehrenfest equations can also be formulated within this general framework, what has been used in the literature to construct propagation schemes for Ehrenfest dynamics. Then, the existence of a well defined Poisson bracket allows to arrive to a Liouville equation for a statistical ensemble of Ehrenfest systems. The study of a generic toy model shows that the evolution produced by Ehrenfest dynamics is ergodic and therefore the only constants of motion are functions of the Hamiltonian. The emergence of the canonical ensemble characterized by the Boltzmann's distribution follows after an appropriate application of the principle of equal a priori probabilities to this case. This work provides the basis for extending stochastic methods to Ehrenfest dynamics.

arXiv:1010.1494•Oct 7, 2010•2 citations

Bosonic field equations from an exact uncertainty principle

Michael J. W. Hall, K. Vijay Kumar, Marcel Reginatto

A Hamiltonian formalism is used to describe ensembles of fields in terms of two canonically conjugate functionals (one being the field probability density). The postulate that a classical ensemble is subject to nonclassical fluctuations of the field momentum density, of a strength determined solely by the field uncertainty, is shown to lead to a unique modification of the ensemble Hamiltonian. The modified equations of motion are equivalent to the quantum equations for a bosonic field, and thus this exact uncertainty principle provides a new approach to deriving and interpreting the properties of quantum ensembles. The examples of electromagnetic and gravitational fields are discussed. In the latter case, the exact uncertainty approach specifies a unique operator ordering for the Wheeler–DeWitt and Ashtekar–Wheeler–DeWitt equations.

arXiv:hep-th/0307259•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Sep 2, 2003•36 citations
The evolution of both quantum and classical ensembles may be described via the probability density P on configuration space, its canonical conjugate S, and an_ensemble_ Hamiltonian H[P,S]. For quantum ensembles this evolution is, of course, equivalent to the Schroedinger equation for the wavefunction, which is linear. However, quite simple constraints on the canonical fields P and S correspond to_nonlinear_ constraints on the wavefunction. Such constraints act to prevent certain superpositions of wavefunctions from being realised, leading to superselection-type rules. Examples leading to superselection for energy, spin-direction and `classicality' are given. The canonical formulation of the equations of motion, in terms of a probability density and its conjugate, provides a universal language for describing classical and quantum ensembles on both continuous and discrete configuration spaces, and is briefly reviewed in an appendix.
The evolution of both quantum and classical ensembles may be described via the probability density P on configuration space, its canonical conjugate S, and an_ensemble_ Hamiltonian H[P,S]. For quantum ensembles this evolution is, of course, equivalent to the Schroedinger equation for the wavefunction, which is linear. However, quite simple constraints on the canonical fields P and S correspond to_nonlinear_ constraints on the wavefunction. Such constraints act to prevent certain superpositions of wavefunctions from being realised, leading to superselection-type rules. Examples leading to superselection for energy, spin-direction and `classicality' are given. The canonical formulation of the equations of motion, in terms of a probability density and its conjugate, provides a universal language for describing classical and quantum ensembles on both continuous and discrete configuration spaces, and is briefly reviewed in an appendix.
A consistent description of interactions between classical and quantum systems is relevant to quantum measurement theory and to calculations in quantum chemistry and quantum gravity. A solution is offered here to this long-standing problem, based on a universally applicable formalism for ensembles on configuration space. This approach overcomes difficulties arising in previous attempts and in particular allows for a back reaction on the classical ensemble, conservation of probability and energy, and the correct classical equations of motion in the limit of no interaction. Applications include automatic decoherence for quantum ensembles interacting with classical measurement apparatuses, a generalization of coherent states to hybrid harmonic oscillators, and an equation for describing the interaction of quantum matter fields with classical gravity, which implies that the radius of a Robertson-Walker universe containing a quantum massive scalar field can be sharply defined only for particular ``quantized'' values.
The starting point of the classical description of motion is the Newton equations that yield a phase space trajectory (rN (t), pN (t)) for a given initial condition (rN (0), pN (0)). Alternatively one may describe classical motion in the framework of the Liouville equation (Section (1.2.2)) that describes the time evolution of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t). For a closed system fully described in terms of a well specified initial condition, the two descriptions are completely equivalent. Probabilistic treatment becomes essential in reduced descriptions that focus on parts of an overall system, as was demonstrated in Sections 5.1–5.3 for equilibrium systems, and in Chapters 7 and 8 that focus on the time evolution of classical systems that interact with their thermal environments. This chapter deals with the analogous quantum mechanical problem. Within the limitations imposed by its nature as expressed, for example, by Heisenbergtype uncertainty principles, the Schrödinger equation is deterministic. Obviously it describes a deterministic evolution of the quantum mechanical wavefunction. The analog of the phase space probability density f (rN , pN ; t) is now the quantum mechanical density operator (often referred to as the “density matrix”), whose time evolution is determined by the quantum Liouville equation. Again, when the system is fully described in terms of a well specified initial wavefunction, the two descriptions are equivalent. The density operator formalism can, however, be carried over to situations where the initial state of the system is not well characterized and/or a reduced description of part of the overall system is desired. Such situations are considered later in this chapter.
Abstract Chapter 10 introduces the concept of quantum ensembles and their descrption via the ensemble density matrix. The chapter begins by setting up the quantum manybody problem and demonstrating the difficulty in solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the energy eigenvalues of a manybody Hamiltonian. This naturally leads to the concept of quantum ensembles and their formulation in terms of the density matrix. Eigenvalues of the density matrx are shown to represent probabilities associated with the quantum states that constitute the ensemble. The time-dependence of the density matrix is shown to be determined by the quantum Liouville equation. The quantum Liouville equation is solved under equilibrium conditions, and the solutions are shown to commute with the Hamiltonian. Thus, the eigenvalues of the solution are shown give the probabilities associated with different energy levels. Quantum partition functions in different ensembles are derived from these eigenvalues. Finally, the quantum analog of entropy maximization is used to derive the quantum canonical ensemble.
Quantum dynamics (e.g., the Schrödinger equation) and classical dynamics (e.g., Hamilton equations) can both be formulated in equal geometric terms: a Poisson bracket defined on a manifold. The difference between both worlds is due to the presence of extra structure in the quantum case, that leads to the appearance of the probabilistic nature of the measurements and the indetermination and superposition principles. In this paper we first show that the quantum-classical dynamics prescribed by the Ehrenfest equations can also be formulated within this general framework, what has been used in the literature to construct propagation schemes for Ehrenfest dynamics. Then, the existence of a well defined Poisson bracket allows to arrive to a Liouville equation for a statistical ensemble of Ehrenfest systems. The study of a generic toy model shows that the evolution produced by Ehrenfest dynamics is ergodic and therefore the only constants of motion are functions of the Hamiltonian. The emergence of the canonical ensemble characterized by the Boltzmann's distribution follows after an appropriate application of the principle of equal a priori probabilities to this case. This work provides the basis for extending stochastic methods to Ehrenfest dynamics.
A Hamiltonian formalism is used to describe ensembles of fields in terms of two canonically conjugate functionals (one being the field probability density). The postulate that a classical ensemble is subject to nonclassical fluctuations of the field momentum density, of a strength determined solely by the field uncertainty, is shown to lead to a unique modification of the ensemble Hamiltonian. The modified equations of motion are equivalent to the quantum equations for a bosonic field, and thus this exact uncertainty principle provides a new approach to deriving and interpreting the properties of quantum ensembles. The examples of electromagnetic and gravitational fields are discussed. In the latter case, the exact uncertainty approach specifies a unique operator ordering for the Wheeler–DeWitt and Ashtekar–Wheeler–DeWitt equations.