Abstract. We derive some rigorous results concerning the backflow operator introduced by Bracken and Melloy. We show that it is linear bounded, self adjoint, and not compact. Thus the question is underlined whether the backflow constant is an eigenvalue of the backflow operator. From the position representation of the backflow operator we obtain a more efficient method to determine the backflow constant. Finally, detailed position probability flow properties of a numerical approximation to the (perhaps improper) wave function of maximal backflow are displayed. PACS numbers: 03.65 1. Introduction and
Abstract. We derive some rigorous results concerning the backflow operator introduced by Bracken and Melloy. We show that it is linear bounded, self adjoint, and not compact. Thus the question is underlined whether the backflow constant is an eigenvalue of the backflow operator. From the position representation of the backflow operator we obtain a more efficient method to determine the backflow constant. Finally, detailed position probability flow properties of a numerical approximation to the (perhaps improper) wave function of maximal backflow are displayed. PACS numbers: 03.65 1. Introduction and
It has been known since at least 1969, that there exist quantum states of a free particle on the line with purely positive momentum that exhibit probability transfer towards the negative half-line. This phenomenon, the quantum backflow effect, is the subject of this thesis. The largest amount of backflow any state can exhibit over a single time interval, the Bracken–Melloy constant, was initially calculated to be cBM ≈ 0.04. In the first half of this thesis, we consider the question of how much quantum backflow states can exhibit over disjoint time intervals. This is done by formulating the question in terms of the spectra of bounded operators. When considering more than one disjoint time interval, we discuss a new phenomenon where a state exhibits more probability transfer in the same direction as its momentum than any classical state. We call this effect quantum overflow. Given a number M of disjoint time intervals, we give bounds on the maximum amount of backflow and overflow a state can exhibit over any M many intervals. The limiting cases in which two disjoint intervals merge into one is particularly studied. Finally, we show plots of the time t = 0 momentum space wavefunction of states exhibiting multiple quantum backflow and quantum overflow. The second half of the thesis contains a detailed numerical investigation into the single backflow problem. Based on previous conjectures, we construct the maximum backflow state from a given set of normalised states closely resembling the sinc function. The Bracken—Melloy constant is then bounded from below by the largest solution to a generalised eigenvalue problem. Using a multi-step numerical procedure, we solve a high precision large dense generalised eigenvalue problem. From this we obtain new numerical approximation to the backflow state and the best known rigorous lower bound of the Bracken—Melloy constant.
Abstract Quantum particles moving in one dimension with rightwards momentum can exhibit the surprising phenomenon of quantum backflow (QB): a net probability transfer to the left-hand half-line over a finite time interval. We generalize this phenomenon by considering the sum of probability differences for M disjoint time intervals. In classical mechanics, the total backflow lies in the interval [−1,0] for all M, indicating rightwards probability transfer. By contrast, we show that the maximum M-fold QB is positive and unbounded from above as M increases, demonstrating the existence of repeated backflow. For M≥2, a new phenomenon of ‘quantum overflow’ is discovered: there are states whose total backflow is below −1, which is impossible for classical particles. The extent of the backflow and overflow effects is described by a hierarchy of backflow and overflow functions and constants, of which the M=1 backflow constant was first studied by Bracken and Melloy. Limiting cases of the backflow and overflow functions are studied, including cases in which two disjoint intervals merge. The analytical results are supported by detailed numerical investigations. Using numerical acceleration methods, we obtain a new estimate of the Bracken–Melloy constant of 0.0384506, slightly lower than the previously accepted value of 0.038452.
Abstract Quantum backflow is the unexpected effect that wavepackets consisting of only positive momentum components can apparently move in the negative direction. This is usually described in terms of the backflow constant, which is a dimensionless quantity describing least upper bound on the amount of probability that can flow backwards during a given time interval. Backflow is usually calculated for wavepackets that can be written as a sum of positive momentum plane waves. Here we present a calculation of the backflow constant using the localised free particle hermite wavefunctions where equal weights of positive and negative momentum eigenfunctions occur. The resulting backflow constant is substantially smaller than the accepted value. The reasons for this are discussed and finally we draw conclusions about the calculation of backflow more generally.
Quantum backflow is a counterintuitive phenomenon in which the probability density of a quantum particle propagates opposite to its momentum. Experimental observation of backflow has remained elusive due to two main challenges: (i) the effect is intrinsically small, with less than 4% of the probability able to flow backward, and (ii) it requires wave packets with a well-defined momentum direction, which are difficult both to prepare and to verify under realistic, noisy conditions. Here, we overcome these challenges by introducing a general formulation of quantum backflow applicable to arbitrary momentum distributions. The framework recovers the standard backflow limit for unidirectional states and identifies general backflow as probability flow exceeding that predicted by the particle's momentum distribution alone. We show that this excess can reach nearly 13%, surpassing the standard backflow bound by more than a factor of three. Furthermore, we extend the framework to the closely related phenomenon of quantum reentry, provide explicit examples of quantum states exhibiting large general backflow and reentry, and discuss the foundational implications of these nonclassical effects. Our results open a pathway toward the experimental observation of quantum backflow in realistic settings.
We present an exhaustive class of states with quantum backflow—the phenomenon in which a state consisting entirely of positive momenta has negative current and the probability flows in the opposite direction to the momentum. They are characterized by a general function of momenta subject to very weak conditions. Such a family of states is of interest in the light of a recent experimental proposal to measure backflow. We find one particularly simple state which has surprisingly large backflow—about 41% of the lower bound on flux derived by Bracken and Melloy. We study the eigenstates of a regularized current operator and we show how some of these states, in a certain limit, lead to our class of backflow states. This limit also clarifies the correspondence between the spectrum of the regularized current operator, which has just two non-zero eigenvalues in our chosen regularization, and the usual current operator.
Abstract The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous [A]presentation of the mathematical tools necessary for the purposes of this theory will be given, i.e., a theory of Hilbert spaces and the so-called Hermitian [or self-adjoint] operators. To this end, an accurate introduction to unbounded operators is also necessary; that is, an extension of the theory beyond its classical limits (developed by Hilbert and E. Hellinger, F. Riesz, E. Schmidt, 0. Toeplitz). The following may be said regarding the method employed in this type of treatment: as a rule, calculations should be performed with the operators themselves (which represent physical quantities) and not with the matrices, which, after the introduction of a (special and arbitrary) coordinate system in Hilbert space, result from them. This “coordinate free” (i.e., invariant) method, with its strongly geometric language, possesses noticeable formal advantages.