Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Regularities in Many-body Systems Interacting by a Two-body Random Ensemble

Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, Naotaka Yoshinaga, Saitama Japan

Published Jan 1, 2003• 33 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

2 Regularities of the ground states in the presence of random interactions 9 2.1 Fermions in a single-j shell........................ 10

Related papers

Collective behavior in random interaction

Calvin W. Johnson, Hai Ah Nam

Recent investigations have looked at the many-body spectra of random two-body interactions. In fermion systems, such as the interacting shell model, one finds pairing-like spectra, while in boson systems, such as IBM-1, one finds rotational and vibrational spectra. We discuss the search for random ensembles of fermion interactions that yield rotational and vibrational spectra, and in particular present results from a new ensemble, the ``random quadrupole-quadrupole ensemble''

arXiv:nucl-th/0601093•Revista Mexicana de Física•Jan 30, 2006•1 citation

Regularities of many-body systems interacting by a two-body random ensemble

Y.M. Zhao, A. Arima, N. Yoshinaga

arXiv:nucl-th/0311050•Physics Reports•Sep 14, 2004•63 citations

Ground state properties of many-body systems in the two-body random ensemble and random matrix theory

Léa Ferreira dos Santos, Dimitri Kusnezov, Philippe Jacquod

arXiv:nucl-th/0201049•Physics Letters B•Jun 1, 2002•11 citations

Many-body systems interacting via a two-body random ensemble. I. Angular momentum distribution in the ground states

Y. M. Zhao, A. Arima, Naotaka Yoshinaga

In this paper we discuss in detail the $P(I)'\mathrm{s},$ angular momentum I probabilities in the ground states, of many-body systems interacting via a two-body random ensemble (TBRE). In particular, we extensively apply an approach introduced in an earlier paper and compare the predicted $P(I)'\mathrm{s}$ with those obtained by diagonalizing a TBRE Hamiltonian. We begin with a few solvable cases, such as fermions in a small single-$j$ shell and d boson systems, where elegant agreements between the predicted $P(I)'\mathrm{s}$ and those obtained by diagonalizing a TBRE Hamiltonian are achieved. We find that d boson systems systematically present counterexamples of angular momentum 0 ground state dominance when the number of d bosons is $6\ensuremath{\kappa}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ with $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ a natural number, which suggests that certain fundamental symmetry (say, time reversal invariance) of the Hamiltonian cannot ensure the occurrence of angular momentum 0 ground state dominance. Next, we apply the same approach to more complicated cases, such as even or odd number of fermions in a large single-$j$ shell or a many-$j$ shell, $\mathrm{sd}$-boson or $\mathrm{sdg}$-boson systems, etc. We find that the simple approach proposed in an earlier paper is also well applicable, and thus it is a universal approach. The numerical experiments provide a guideline to tell which interactions are essential to produce a sizable $P(I)$ in a many-body system. This disproves a popular idea that the angular momentum 0 ground state (0 g.s.) dominance may be independent of two-body interactions. Some matrix elements which are useful to understand the observed regularities are given or addressed in detail. In this paper we also report a synchronous staggering between the 0 g.s. probabilities of even numbers of fermions in a single-$j$ shells and j g.s. probabilities of odd numbers of fermions in a single-$j$ shell when j is small. The low seniority chain of 0 g.s. using the same set of two-body interactions is confirmed, but it is noted that contribution to the total 0 g.s. probability beyond this chain may be more important for even numbers of fermions in a single-$j$ shell. Some interesting results taking a displaced two-body random ensemble are presented for the I ground state probabilities.

arXiv:nucl-th/0206040•Physical Review C•Dec 31, 2002•20 citations

Many-body systems in the presence of the random interactions and the J pairing interaction

Akito Arima

In this talk I shall discuss some regularities of many‐body systems in the presence of random interactions and regularities of a single‐j shell for the J pairing interaction which works only when two particles are coupled to spin J. I shall first explain an empirical rule to predict the spin I ground state probability. Then I shall present some interesting results of a single‐j shell under the J pairing interaction. Last I shall discuss some preliminary results of binding energies in the presence of random two‐body interactions.

arXiv:nucl-th/0405071•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

CLUSTERING PHENOMENON BY RANDOM TWO-BODY INTERACTIONS AND THE J max PAIRING INTERACTION

Y. M. Zhao, Akito Arima

In this talk we first explain the context of a topic called "regularities for many-body systems in the presence of random two-body interactions". Then we discuss the robustness of the α clustering phenomenon in the presence of random two-body interactions. Last, we discuss a clustering picture of fermions in a single-j shell with the J max pairing interaction.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Jul 10, 2005•0 citations
In this paper we discuss in detail the P(I)′s,P(I)'\mathrm{s},P(I)′s, angular momentum I probabilities in the ground states, of many-body systems interacting via a two-body random ensemble (TBRE). In particular, we extensively apply an approach introduced in an earlier paper and compare the predicted P(I)′sP(I)'\mathrm{s}P(I)′s with those obtained by diagonalizing a TBRE Hamiltonian. We begin with a few solvable cases, such as fermions in a small single-jjj shell and d boson systems, where elegant agreements between the predicted P(I)′sP(I)'\mathrm{s}P(I)′s and those obtained by diagonalizing a TBRE Hamiltonian are achieved. We find that d boson systems systematically present counterexamples of angular momentum 0 ground state dominance when the number of d bosons is $6\ensuremath{\kappa}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1$ with $\ensuremath{\kappa}$ a natural number, which suggests that certain fundamental symmetry (say, time reversal invariance) of the Hamiltonian cannot ensure the occurrence of angular momentum 0 ground state dominance. Next, we apply the same approach to more complicated cases, such as even or odd number of fermions in a large single-jjj shell or a many-jjj shell, sd\mathrm{sd}sd-boson or sdg\mathrm{sdg}sdg-boson systems, etc. We find that the simple approach proposed in an earlier paper is also well applicable, and thus it is a universal approach. The numerical experiments provide a guideline to tell which interactions are essential to produce a sizable P(I)P(I)P(I) in a many-body system. This disproves a popular idea that the angular momentum 0 ground state (0 g.s.) dominance may be independent of two-body interactions. Some matrix elements which are useful to understand the observed regularities are given or addressed in detail. In this paper we also report a synchronous staggering between the 0 g.s. probabilities of even numbers of fermions in a single-jjj shells and j g.s. probabilities of odd numbers of fermions in a single-jjj shell when j is small. The low seniority chain of 0 g.s. using the same set of two-body interactions is confirmed, but it is noted that contribution to the total 0 g.s. probability beyond this chain may be more important for even numbers of fermions in a single-jjj shell. Some interesting results taking a displaced two-body random ensemble are presented for the I ground state probabilities.
In this talk I shall discuss some regularities of many‐body systems in the presence of random interactions and regularities of a single‐j shell for the J pairing interaction which works only when two particles are coupled to spin J. I shall first explain an empirical rule to predict the spin I ground state probability. Then I shall present some interesting results of a single‐j shell under the J pairing interaction. Last I shall discuss some preliminary results of binding energies in the presence of random two‐body interactions.