Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Superfluorescent decay in quasiballistic disordered systems.

A. Yu. Zyuzin

Published Jan 1, 2008• 5 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Superfluorescent decay in a weakly disordered slab is considered. By solving the Maxwell-Bloch equations we show, that the cooperation number increases with increasing of the mean free path. Superfluorescent impulse is emitted at a small angle to the slab, isotropically in a plane direction. PACS.42.20-Propagation and transmission in inhomogeneous media. PACS.42.20G-Scattering, diffraction and polarization. Introduction. During the spontaneous emission of uncorrelated exited atoms, their dipole moments interact each other via the emitted electromagnetic field. If the lifetime of exited state is long enough, the radiation can induce the correlation between the group of large number Nc (so called cooperation

Related papers

Superfluorescent decay in quasiballistic disordered systems

A. Yu Zyuzin

Superfluorescent decay in a weakly disordered slab is considered. By solving the Maxwell-Bloch equations we show that the cooperation number increases with increasing the mean free path. Superfluorescent impulse is emitted at a small angle to the slab, isotropically in a plane direction.

arXiv:cond-mat/9810106•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Apr 15, 1999•4 citations

Cooperative radiation processes in two-level systems: Superfluorescence

R. Bonifacio, Luigi A. Lugiato

We give a general nonperturbative treatment of cooperative emission in systems of $N$ two-level atoms, starting from first principles and including inhomogeneous broadening. In particular, we study superfluorescence, which is defined as the cooperative spontaneous emission, i.e., radiation rate proportional to ${N}^{2}$, from an atomic system initially excited with zero macroscopic dipole moment and a uniform population difference between the excited and the fundamental states. The atomic system is described by means of collective dipole operators. A fundamental justification is given for the existence of damped "quasimodes" of the mirrorless active volume. The damping of such modes is simply due to the propagation of the Maxwell field, which escapes from the active volume. A general atom-field master equation is derived for the system atoms plus field inside the active volume, described, respectively, in terms of collective dipole operators and quasimode operators. An important feature of this equation is that inhomogeneous broadening simply appears via a time-dependent atom-field coupling constant. In this paper we give a semiclassical treatment of such a master equation. For a pencil-shaped geometry of the active volume, generalized Maxwell-Bloch equations are derived for the envelopes of the radiation inside the active volume and polarization. Such equations take into account the two directions of propagation of the radiation and the inhomogeneous broadening. Suitably phrasing our initial condition in semiclassical terms, we find that propagation effects can be neglected at all times and the generalized Maxwell-Bloch equations reduce to a simple pendulum equation. On the basis of the discussion of the pendulum equation, we conclude that superfluorescence occurs when (i) the length $L$ of the active volume is much larger than a suitable threshold length ${L}_{T}$ (this condition ensures that the dephasing atomic processes occur on a time scale much larger than the times characteristic of the cooperative emission); (ii) the length $L$ is smaller or of the same order of a suitable cooperation length ${L}_{c}$ (this condition ensures that cooperative spontaneous emission dominates stimulated processes, which give radiation proportional to $N$). For $L\ensuremath{\ll}{L}_{c}$, one has a hyperbolic-secant superfluorescent pulse; for $L\ensuremath{\approx}{L}_{c}$, as one has in the recent experiments of Skribanowitz et al., one finds oscillations in the cooperative decay and in the radiation emission. Such oscillations are due to the contribution of stimulated processes. For $L\ensuremath{\gg}{L}_{c}$, this contribution increases. As a consequence one gets more oscillations in the radiated intensity, which becomes proportional to $N$, so that superfluorescence effects disappear.

Physical Review A•May 1, 1975•623 citations

Superfluorescence of Photonic Paint

A. Yu. Zyuzin

We consider the cooperative decay of incoherently pumped atoms in a disordered medium, where light undergoes multiple scattering. It is shown that the cooperation number, which determines the duration and amplitude of superfluorescent impulses, is given by the number of atoms along a diffusive trajectory of the light propagating through the medium. We also consider the problem of reflection of a probe wave during cooperative emission. 1

•Jan 1, 1998•7 citations

Superfluorescence of photonic paint

A. Yu. Zyuzin

We consider the cooperative decay of incoherently pumped atoms in a disordered medium, where light undergoes multiple scattering. It is shown that the cooperation number, which determines the duration and amplitude of superfluorescent impulses, is given by the number of atoms along a diffusive trajectory of the light propagating through the medium. We also consider the problem of reflection of a probe wave during cooperative emission.

arXiv:cond-mat/9801156•Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 1998•6 citations

Superfluorescence and cooperative frequency shift

Gian Piero Banfi, R. Bonifacio

We discuss from first principles the cooperative decay of a system of two-level atoms, initially prepared in an uncorrelated excited state with population inversion $N$, and we give the conditions under which the superfluorescence effect occurs. Describing the atomic system in terms of collective variables, we derive a master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, which gives rise both to a damping and to a time-dependent frequency shift in the dynamics of collective modes. The coupled equations of motion are solved with a self-consistent approach. It is found that the system goes through a nonexponential decay if the maximum length of the active volume is smaller than a "cooperation range" and larger than a "threshold length," in agreement with the one-mode theory. The radiation burst has a time width proportional to ${N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, and its intensity is proportional to ${N}^{2}$. Specializing to a pencil-shaped volume, we find that only two atomic modes need to be considered; in this case, the average emitted radiation is all condensed in the two diffraction patterns of the opposite axial modes.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1975•43 citations

Superfluorescence Dynamics in Er:YLF

Bortoli Saygashev, Alexey Vladimirovic

Spontaneous decay is a phenomenon that has been described for the first time by Dirac, Wigner and Weisskopf, at the early ages of the development of quantum electrodynamics. The theory is applicable to a multi-body system only when atoms don’t interact during their decay. Dicke introduces in his seminal paper the case where this assumption doesn’t hold. The results he obtains not only tell that the system emits pulses, but the pulse duration now depends on 1/N, where N is the number of participating atoms to the process. The pulses temporal profile is described by a squared hyperbolic secant function. The resulting emission intensity scales as N^2. The atomic system radiates more intensively than the ordinary fluorescent emission, this is the reason why the process is called superradiance, or by a generalization to extended systems, superfluorescence. The superradiant emission has preferential escape directions, depending on the atomic sample shape. Superradiance is a collective process and it takes place when the group of excited atoms is left unper- turbed during the formation of of the macroscopic dipole. A fundamental difference compared to the spontaneous and stimulated emission processes is that all atoms act together as a single entity and it isn’t possible to identify single atoms involved. This remarkable behaviour is manifest when the atomic coherence of the system, while influenced by environmental interactions that cause dephasing in atoms, persists for a sufficient interval of time. Typical dephasing mechanisms, such as collisions in gases or lattice phonon interactions in crystals, make its experimental observation difficult. A possible solution to this problem is the use of optical crystals doped with rare-earths that are characterized by long and narrow levels lifetimes.

•Sep 17, 2019•0 citations
Superfluorescent decay in a weakly disordered slab is considered. By solving the Maxwell-Bloch equations we show, that the cooperation number increases with increasing of the mean free path. Superfluorescent impulse is emitted at a small angle to the slab, isotropically in a plane direction. PACS.42.20-Propagation and transmission in inhomogeneous media. PACS.42.20G-Scattering, diffraction and polarization. Introduction. During the spontaneous emission of uncorrelated exited atoms, their dipole moments interact each other via the emitted electromagnetic field. If the lifetime of exited state is long enough, the radiation can induce the correlation between the group of large number Nc (so called cooperation
We give a general nonperturbative treatment of cooperative emission in systems of NNN two-level atoms, starting from first principles and including inhomogeneous broadening. In particular, we study superfluorescence, which is defined as the cooperative spontaneous emission, i.e., radiation rate proportional to N2{N}^{2}N2, from an atomic system initially excited with zero macroscopic dipole moment and a uniform population difference between the excited and the fundamental states. The atomic system is described by means of collective dipole operators. A fundamental justification is given for the existence of damped "quasimodes" of the mirrorless active volume. The damping of such modes is simply due to the propagation of the Maxwell field, which escapes from the active volume. A general atom-field master equation is derived for the system atoms plus field inside the active volume, described, respectively, in terms of collective dipole operators and quasimode operators. An important feature of this equation is that inhomogeneous broadening simply appears via a time-dependent atom-field coupling constant. In this paper we give a semiclassical treatment of such a master equation. For a pencil-shaped geometry of the active volume, generalized Maxwell-Bloch equations are derived for the envelopes of the radiation inside the active volume and polarization. Such equations take into account the two directions of propagation of the radiation and the inhomogeneous broadening. Suitably phrasing our initial condition in semiclassical terms, we find that propagation effects can be neglected at all times and the generalized Maxwell-Bloch equations reduce to a simple pendulum equation. On the basis of the discussion of the pendulum equation, we conclude that superfluorescence occurs when (i) the length LLL of the active volume is much larger than a suitable threshold length LT{L}_{T}LT​ (this condition ensures that the dephasing atomic processes occur on a time scale much larger than the times characteristic of the cooperative emission); (ii) the length LLL is smaller or of the same order of a suitable cooperation length Lc{L}_{c}Lc​ (this condition ensures that cooperative spontaneous emission dominates stimulated processes, which give radiation proportional to NNN). For $L\ensuremath{\ll}{L}_{c}$, one has a hyperbolic-secant superfluorescent pulse; for $L\ensuremath{\approx}{L}_{c}$, as one has in the recent experiments of Skribanowitz et al., one finds oscillations in the cooperative decay and in the radiation emission. Such oscillations are due to the contribution of stimulated processes. For $L\ensuremath{\gg}{L}_{c}$, this contribution increases. As a consequence one gets more oscillations in the radiated intensity, which becomes proportional to NNN, so that superfluorescence effects disappear.
We discuss from first principles the cooperative decay of a system of two-level atoms, initially prepared in an uncorrelated excited state with population inversion NNN, and we give the conditions under which the superfluorescence effect occurs. Describing the atomic system in terms of collective variables, we derive a master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, which gives rise both to a damping and to a time-dependent frequency shift in the dynamics of collective modes. The coupled equations of motion are solved with a self-consistent approach. It is found that the system goes through a nonexponential decay if the maximum length of the active volume is smaller than a "cooperation range" and larger than a "threshold length," in agreement with the one-mode theory. The radiation burst has a time width proportional to ${N}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, and its intensity is proportional to N2{N}^{2}N2. Specializing to a pencil-shaped volume, we find that only two atomic modes need to be considered; in this case, the average emitted radiation is all condensed in the two diffraction patterns of the opposite axial modes.
Spontaneous decay is a phenomenon that has been described for the first time by Dirac, Wigner and Weisskopf, at the early ages of the development of quantum electrodynamics. The theory is applicable to a multi-body system only when atoms don’t interact during their decay. Dicke introduces in his seminal paper the case where this assumption doesn’t hold. The results he obtains not only tell that the system emits pulses, but the pulse duration now depends on 1/N, where N is the number of participating atoms to the process. The pulses temporal profile is described by a squared hyperbolic secant function. The resulting emission intensity scales as N^2. The atomic system radiates more intensively than the ordinary fluorescent emission, this is the reason why the process is called superradiance, or by a generalization to extended systems, superfluorescence. The superradiant emission has preferential escape directions, depending on the atomic sample shape. Superradiance is a collective process and it takes place when the group of excited atoms is left unper- turbed during the formation of of the macroscopic dipole. A fundamental difference compared to the spontaneous and stimulated emission processes is that all atoms act together as a single entity and it isn’t possible to identify single atoms involved. This remarkable behaviour is manifest when the atomic coherence of the system, while influenced by environmental interactions that cause dephasing in atoms, persists for a sufficient interval of time. Typical dephasing mechanisms, such as collisions in gases or lattice phonon interactions in crystals, make its experimental observation difficult. A possible solution to this problem is the use of optical crystals doped with rare-earths that are characterized by long and narrow levels lifetimes.