Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems

Hai Pang, Wu-Sheng Dai, Mi Xie

Published Jan 1, 2006• 38 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In this paper, we show that there exists an essential difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems both for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions: at low temperatures and high densities the influence of the boundary on the Bose system depends on the temperature but is independent of the density, but for the Fermi case the influence of the boundary is independent of the temperature but depends on the density, after omitting the negligible high-order corrections. We also show that at high temperatures and low densities the difference of the influence of the boundary between Bose and Fermi systems appears in the next-to-leading order boundary contribution, and the leading boundary contribution is independent of the density. Moreover, for calculating the boundary effects at high temperatures and low densities, since the existence of the boundary modification causes the standard virial expansion to be invalid, we introduce a modified virial expansion. PACS numbers: 05.30.-d, 05.70.Ce, 65.80.+n, 82.60.Qr 1

Related papers

The difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems

Hai Pang, Wu-Sheng Dai, Mi Xie

In this paper, we show that there exists an essential difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems both for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions: at low temperatures and high densities the influence of the boundary on the Bose system depends on the temperature but is independent of the density, but for the Fermi case the influence of the boundary is independent of the temperature but depends on the density, after omitting the negligible high-order corrections. We also show that at high temperatures and low densities the difference of the influence of the boundary between Bose and Fermi systems appears in the next-to-leading order boundary contribution, and the leading boundary contribution is independent of the density. Moreover, for calculating the boundary effects at high temperatures and low densities, since the existence of the boundary modification causes the standard virial expansion to be invalid, we introduce a modified virial expansion.

arXiv:cond-mat/0603289•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 1, 2006•45 citations

Interacting quantum gases in confined space: Two- and three-dimensional equations of state

Wu-Sheng Dai, Mi Xie

In this paper, we calculate the equations of state and the thermodynamic quantities for two- and three-dimensional hard-sphere Bose and Fermi gases in finite-size containers. The approach we used to deal with interacting gases is to convert the effect of interparticle hard-sphere interaction to a kind of boundary effect, and then the problem of a confined hard-sphere quantum gas is converted to the problem of a confined ideal quantum gas with a complex boundary. For this purpose, we first develop an approach for calculating the boundary effect on d-dimensional ideal quantum gases and then calculate the equation of state for confined quantum hard-sphere gases. The thermodynamic quantities and their low-temperature and high-density expansions are also given. In higher-order contributions, there are cross terms involving both the influences of the boundary and of the interparticle interaction. We compare the effect of the boundary and the effect of the interparticle interaction. Our result shows that, at low temperatures and high densities, the ratios of the effect of the boundary to the effect of the interparticle interaction in two dimensions are essentially different to those in three dimensions: in two dimensions, the ratios for Bose systems and for Fermi systems are the same and are independent of temperatures, while in three dimensions, the ratio for Bose systems depends on temperatures, but the ratio for Fermi systems is independent of temperatures. Moreover, for three-dimensional Fermi cases, compared with the contributions from the boundary, the contributions from the interparticle interaction to entropies and specific heats are negligible.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2007•39 citations

Influence of boundary conditions on the growth of condensate fraction in a finite Bose system

C. S. Zasada, Raj K. Pathria

In a recent paper we carried out a rigorous, asymptotic analysis of the low-temperature behavior of a Bose gas confined to a finite cubic geometry and subjected to periodic boundary conditions. That analysis is now extended to Dirichlet, Neumann, and antiperiodic boundary conditions. As before, the thermogeometric parameter $y$ and the condensate fraction $\frac{{N}_{0}}{N}$ are studied as functions of temperature and are evaluated explicity for cubes with $\frac{L}{\overline{l}}=40 \mathrm{and} 100$, where $L$ is the edge length of the enclosure and $\overline{l}$ the mean interparticle distance in the system. The finite-size corrections to the condensate fraction under Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions turn out to be qualitatively different from those under periodic or antiperiodic boundary conditions. This difference becomes manifest when one tries to express these corrections in a form consistent with the standard scaling theory for finite-size effects.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1977•15 citations

Virial coefficients for trapped Bose and Fermi gases beyond the unitary limit: An S -matrix approach

Edgar Marcelino de Carvalho Neto, André Nicolai, I. Roditi +1 more

We study the virial expansion for three-dimensional Bose and Fermi gases at finite temperature using an approximation that only considers two-body processes and is valid for high temperatures and low densities. The first virial coefficients are computed and the second is exact. The results are obtained for the full range of values of the scattering length, and the unitary limit is recovered as a particular case. A weak coupling expansion is performed and the free case is also obtained as a proper limit. The influence of an anisotropic harmonic trap is considered using the local density approximation (LDA), analytical results are obtained, and the special case of the isotropic trap is discussed in detail.

arXiv:1407.3770•Physical Review A•Nov 17, 2014•6 citations

Boundary effect of a partition in a quantum well

Tamás Fülöp, Izumi Tsutsui

The paper wishes to demonstrate that, in quantum systems with boundaries, different boundary conditions can lead to remarkably different physical behaviour. Our seemingly innocent setting is a one-dimensional potential well that is divided into two halves by a thin separating wall. The two half wells are populated by the same type and number of particles and are kept at the same temperature. The only difference is in the boundary condition imposed at the two sides of the separating wall, which is the Dirichlet condition from the left and the Neumann condition from the right. The resulting different energy spectra cause a difference in the quantum statistically emerging pressure on the two sides. The net force acting on the separating wall proves to be nonzero at any temperature and, after a weak decrease in the low-temperature domain, to increase and diverge with a square-root-of-temperature asymptotics for high temperatures. These observations hold for both bosonic and fermionic type particles, but with quantitative differences. We work out several analytic approximations to explain these differences and the various aspects of the found unexpectedly complex picture.

arXiv:quant-ph/0612011•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Apr 11, 2007•7 citations

Effect of boundary conditions on finite Bose-Einstein assemblies

Stanley Greenspoon, Raj K. Pathria

The recent observation by Hasan and Goble of a discrepancy between their numerical results on the specific heat of an ideal Bose gas confined to a thin-film geometry and the earlier analytic calculations of Pathria employing Neumann boundary conditions is shown to be unjustified. In those cases where a true comparison is possible, e.g., under Dirichlet or periodic boundary conditions, the observed deviations turn out to be insignificant if one uses the more recent second-order calculations of Greenspoon and Pathria rather than the original first-order ones of Pathria. For comparison under Neumann boundary conditions, fresh numerical calculations are required. We also present here second-order analytic calculations of the specific heat of this system (i) under mixed boundary conditions (Dirichlet on one wall, Neumann on the other) and (ii) under antiperiodic boundary conditions, and compare them with the relevant numerical calculations of Hasan and Goble.

Physical Review A•Mar 1, 1975•22 citations
In this paper, we show that there exists an essential difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems both for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions: at low temperatures and high densities the influence of the boundary on the Bose system depends on the temperature but is independent of the density, but for the Fermi case the influence of the boundary is independent of the temperature but depends on the density, after omitting the negligible high-order corrections. We also show that at high temperatures and low densities the difference of the influence of the boundary between Bose and Fermi systems appears in the next-to-leading order boundary contribution, and the leading boundary contribution is independent of the density. Moreover, for calculating the boundary effects at high temperatures and low densities, since the existence of the boundary modification causes the standard virial expansion to be invalid, we introduce a modified virial expansion. PACS numbers: 05.30.-d, 05.70.Ce, 65.80.+n, 82.60.Qr 1
In this paper, we show that there exists an essential difference of boundary effects between Bose and Fermi systems both for Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions: at low temperatures and high densities the influence of the boundary on the Bose system depends on the temperature but is independent of the density, but for the Fermi case the influence of the boundary is independent of the temperature but depends on the density, after omitting the negligible high-order corrections. We also show that at high temperatures and low densities the difference of the influence of the boundary between Bose and Fermi systems appears in the next-to-leading order boundary contribution, and the leading boundary contribution is independent of the density. Moreover, for calculating the boundary effects at high temperatures and low densities, since the existence of the boundary modification causes the standard virial expansion to be invalid, we introduce a modified virial expansion.
In this paper, we calculate the equations of state and the thermodynamic quantities for two- and three-dimensional hard-sphere Bose and Fermi gases in finite-size containers. The approach we used to deal with interacting gases is to convert the effect of interparticle hard-sphere interaction to a kind of boundary effect, and then the problem of a confined hard-sphere quantum gas is converted to the problem of a confined ideal quantum gas with a complex boundary. For this purpose, we first develop an approach for calculating the boundary effect on d-dimensional ideal quantum gases and then calculate the equation of state for confined quantum hard-sphere gases. The thermodynamic quantities and their low-temperature and high-density expansions are also given. In higher-order contributions, there are cross terms involving both the influences of the boundary and of the interparticle interaction. We compare the effect of the boundary and the effect of the interparticle interaction. Our result shows that, at low temperatures and high densities, the ratios of the effect of the boundary to the effect of the interparticle interaction in two dimensions are essentially different to those in three dimensions: in two dimensions, the ratios for Bose systems and for Fermi systems are the same and are independent of temperatures, while in three dimensions, the ratio for Bose systems depends on temperatures, but the ratio for Fermi systems is independent of temperatures. Moreover, for three-dimensional Fermi cases, compared with the contributions from the boundary, the contributions from the interparticle interaction to entropies and specific heats are negligible.
In a recent paper we carried out a rigorous, asymptotic analysis of the low-temperature behavior of a Bose gas confined to a finite cubic geometry and subjected to periodic boundary conditions. That analysis is now extended to Dirichlet, Neumann, and antiperiodic boundary conditions. As before, the thermogeometric parameter yyy and the condensate fraction N0N\frac{{N}_{0}}{N}NN0​​ are studied as functions of temperature and are evaluated explicity for cubes with Ll‾=40and100\frac{L}{\overline{l}}=40 \mathrm{and} 100lL​=40and100, where LLL is the edge length of the enclosure and l‾\overline{l}l the mean interparticle distance in the system. The finite-size corrections to the condensate fraction under Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions turn out to be qualitatively different from those under periodic or antiperiodic boundary conditions. This difference becomes manifest when one tries to express these corrections in a form consistent with the standard scaling theory for finite-size effects.
We study the virial expansion for three-dimensional Bose and Fermi gases at finite temperature using an approximation that only considers two-body processes and is valid for high temperatures and low densities. The first virial coefficients are computed and the second is exact. The results are obtained for the full range of values of the scattering length, and the unitary limit is recovered as a particular case. A weak coupling expansion is performed and the free case is also obtained as a proper limit. The influence of an anisotropic harmonic trap is considered using the local density approximation (LDA), analytical results are obtained, and the special case of the isotropic trap is discussed in detail.
The paper wishes to demonstrate that, in quantum systems with boundaries, different boundary conditions can lead to remarkably different physical behaviour. Our seemingly innocent setting is a one-dimensional potential well that is divided into two halves by a thin separating wall. The two half wells are populated by the same type and number of particles and are kept at the same temperature. The only difference is in the boundary condition imposed at the two sides of the separating wall, which is the Dirichlet condition from the left and the Neumann condition from the right. The resulting different energy spectra cause a difference in the quantum statistically emerging pressure on the two sides. The net force acting on the separating wall proves to be nonzero at any temperature and, after a weak decrease in the low-temperature domain, to increase and diverge with a square-root-of-temperature asymptotics for high temperatures. These observations hold for both bosonic and fermionic type particles, but with quantitative differences. We work out several analytic approximations to explain these differences and the various aspects of the found unexpectedly complex picture.
The recent observation by Hasan and Goble of a discrepancy between their numerical results on the specific heat of an ideal Bose gas confined to a thin-film geometry and the earlier analytic calculations of Pathria employing Neumann boundary conditions is shown to be unjustified. In those cases where a true comparison is possible, e.g., under Dirichlet or periodic boundary conditions, the observed deviations turn out to be insignificant if one uses the more recent second-order calculations of Greenspoon and Pathria rather than the original first-order ones of Pathria. For comparison under Neumann boundary conditions, fresh numerical calculations are required. We also present here second-order analytic calculations of the specific heat of this system (i) under mixed boundary conditions (Dirichlet on one wall, Neumann on the other) and (ii) under antiperiodic boundary conditions, and compare them with the relevant numerical calculations of Hasan and Goble.