On bipartite pure-state entanglement structure in terms of disentanglement

Herbut, F

Published Sep 9, 2006• 5 citations

Abstract

Schroedinger's disentanglement [E. Schroedinger, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)], i. e., remote state decomposition, as a physical way to study entanglement, is carried one step further with respect to previous work in investigating the qualitative side of entanglement in any bipartite state vector. Remote measurement (or, equivalently, remote orthogonal state decomposition) from previous work is generalized to remote linearly-independent complete state decomposition both in the non-selective and the selective versions. The results are displayed in terms of commutative square diagrams, which show the power and beauty of the physical meaning of the (antiunitary) correlation operator inherent in the given bipartite state vector. This operator, together with the subsystem states (reduced density operators), constitutes the so-called correlated subsystem picture. It is the central part of the antilinear representation of a bipartite state vector, and it is a kind of core of its entanglement structure. The generalization of previously elaborated disentanglement expounded in this article is a synthesis of the antilinear representation of bipartite state vectors, which is reviewed, and the relevant results of Cassinelli et al. [J. Math. Analys. and Appl., 210, 472 (1997)] in mathematical analysis, which are summed up. Linearly-independent bases (finite or infinite) are shown to be almost as useful in some quantum mechanical studies as orthonormal ones. Finally, it is shown that linearly-independent remote pure-state preparation carries the highest probability of occurrence. This singles out linearly-independent remote influence from all possible ones.

Related papers

On bipartite pure-state entanglement structure in terms of disentanglement

Fedor Herbut

Schrödinger’s disentanglement [E. Schrödinger, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 555 (1935)], i.e., remote state decomposition, as a physical way to study entanglement, is carried one step further with respect to previous work in investigating the qualitative side of entanglement in any bipartite state vector. Remote measurement (or, equivalently, remote orthogonal state decomposition) from previous work is generalized to remote linearly independent complete state decomposition both in the nonselective and the selective versions. The results are displayed in terms of commutative square diagrams, which show the power and beauty of the physical meaning of the (antiunitary) correlation operator inherent in the given bipartite state vector. This operator, together with the subsystem states (reduced density operators), constitutes the so-called correlated subsystem picture. It is the central part of the antilinear representation of a bipartite state vector, and it is a kind of core of its entanglement structure. The generalization of previously elaborated disentanglement expounded in this article is a synthesis of the antilinear representation of bipartite state vectors, which is reviewed, and the relevant results of [Cassinelli et al., J. Math. Anal. Appl. 210, 472 (1997)] in mathematical analysis, which are summed up. Linearly independent bases (finite or infinite) are shown to be almost as useful in some quantum mechanical studies as orthonormal ones. Finally, it is shown that linearly independent remote pure-state preparation carries the highest probability of occurrence. This singles out linearly independent remote influence from all possible ones.

arXiv:quant-ph/0609073Journal of Mathematical PhysicsDec 1, 20064 citations

On Schmidt Decomposition: Approach Based on Correlation Operator as Bipartite Entanglement Entity

Fedor Herbut

An elaborated review with proofs of Schmidt canonical decomposition of any bipartite state vector is approached through general subsystem basis expansion. The upgraded forms of Schmidt decomposition in terms of correlation operator and twin observables are presented in detail. The discussion is extended to distant measurement, Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen states and Schrödinger's steering. All claims and proofs are given in standard form unlike in the previous articles of the author where all results were obtained utilizing the very rarely used antilinear Hilbert–Schmidt maps of one subsystem state space into the other. For practical reasons the formalism of partial traces with their rules and reduced density operators together with correlation operator are used. Quanta 2018; 7: 19–39.

QuantaFeb 20, 20182 citations

Bipartite Entanglement Review of Subsystem-Basis Expansions and Correlation Operators in It

Fedor Herbut

The present review presents the authors previous results on the topic from the title in a new light. Most of the previous results were obtained using the techniques of antilinear Hilbert-Schmidt mappings of one Hilbert pace into another, which is unknown and unused in the literature. This, naturally, diminished the impact of the results. In this article the results are derived anew with standard techniques. The topics listed at the end of the Introduction, are expounded in 9 theorems, 5 propositions etc. Partial scalar product and partial trace methods are used throughout. Further relevant research articles that are not reproduced in this review, are sketched in the Concluding remarks.

arXiv:1410.4988Oct 18, 20142 citations

From Primitives to Bipartite Entanglement

Allen Proxmire

In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen published the paper that introduced what would become quantum mechanics’ most studied phenomenon. Two systems prepared together and then separated remain correlated — perfectly correlated, in some cases — across arbitrary distances. The correlations exceed anything classical physics permits, are tested today across hundreds of kilometers via satellite‑mediated photon pairs, and form the resource that quantum cryptography, teleportation, and computation rely on. The standard QM account is mathematically clean. Two systems with Hilbert spaces H_A and H_B are described on H_A ⊗ H_B; states that cannot be written as |ψ_A⟩ ⊗ |ψ_B⟩ are entangled. Bell–Tsirelson bounds CHSH at 2√2. Schmidt decomposes any pure bipartite state biorthogonally. Coffman–Kundu–Wootters codifies monogamy. No‑signaling follows from linearity of partial trace. Von Neumann entropy S(ρ_A) = −Tr(ρ_A log ρ_A) measures entanglement strength. Each piece is a theorem of the postulated formalism — but the postulates themselves (tensor‑product joint structure, Hilbert space, Born rule) are not derived. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the structural commitments themselves. Six results, each derived from the same substrate primitives: (1) Tensor‑product composition — the joint participation measure of two endpoints sharing one rule is carried on H_A ⊗ H_B with bilinearly induced inner product. Form forced; no auxiliary assumption. (2) Generic non‑factorizability — entangled states are dense and full‑measure; product states are the measure‑zero exception. (3) Schmidt decomposition — every pure bipartite state has a biorthogonal decomposition with non‑negative coefficients summing to one. Form forced; values inherited. (4) Monogamy — each substrate endpoint has a finite local cross‑chain bandwidth budget; full bipartite entanglement saturates it; no capacity remains for a third endpoint. CKW is the substrate bandwidth‑conservation law in concurrence units. (5) No‑signaling — over‑determined by three independent substrate locks: T18 forward‑cone‑only kernel structure, P11 commitment irreversibility, and the ED‑I‑06 no‑fundamental‑fields guardrail. (6) Von Neumann entropy — the form is uniquely picked by Shannon–Khinchin axioms each independently derived from named substrate primitives. This walkthrough has more substrate content than Bell–Tsirelson or Heisenberg. Those ran on standard mathematical‑physics arguments once the framework supplied the Hilbert space; the contribution was upstream. Here the framework is upstream for tensor‑product composition, Schmidt, and the density of entangled states — and substantively new for monogamy, no‑signaling, and entropy, each receiving a substrate‑mechanism account standard QM does not provide. The structural payoff: bipartite entanglement is what the substrate produces when two endpoints share one undeveloped participation rule. Tensor product, Schmidt structure, monogamy, no‑signaling, and entropy form are six projections of one substrate phenomenon.

May 12, 20260 citations

ANTILINEAR HILBERT-SCHMIDT OPERATORS THAT MAP ONE HILBERT SPACE INTO ANOTHER ISOMORPHIC TO TWO-PARTICLE VECTORS

Fedor Herbut

Abstract. In this article the antilinear-operator representation of twoparticle state vectors (wave functions) in quantum mechanics and its application in distant correlations is reviewed. All proofs are omitted. They are contained in the references. 2003 PACS classification scheme: 03.65.Ca (Formalism); 03.65.Db (Functional analytical methods; 03.65Fd (Algebraic methods): Key words and phrases: Bipartite entanglement; distant correlations 1.

Jan 1, 20080 citations

Private quantum decoupling

Francesco Buscemi

Given a bipartite quantum system, correlations between its subsystems can be understood as information that each one carries about the other. In order to give a model-independent description of secure information disposal, we propose the paradigm of private quantum decoupling, corresponding to locally reducing correlations in a given bipartite state without transferring them to the environment. In this framework, the concept of private local randomness naturally arises as a resource, and total correlations get divided into eliminable and ineliminable ones. We prove upper and lower bounds on the amount of ineliminable correlations present in an arbitrary bipartite state, and show that, in tripartite pure states, ineliminable correlations satisfy a monogamy constraint, making apparent their quantum nature. A relation with entanglement theory is provided by showing that ineliminable correlations constitute an entanglement parameter. In the limit of infinitely many copies of the initial state provided, we compute the regularized ineliminable correlations to be measured by the coherent information, which is thus equipped with a new operational interpretation. In particular, our results imply that two subsystems can be privately decoupled if their joint state is separable.

Jan 28, 20090 citations