Is complex probability theory consistent with Bell's theorem?

Saul Youssef

Published Jun 28, 1994• 12 citations

Abstract

Bayesian complex probability theory is shown to be consistent with Bell's theorem and with several other recent limitations on local realistic theories which agree with the predictions of quantum mechanics.

Related papers

Bell's Theorem and "Classical" Probability Theory

H. Razmi, Mohammad Golshani

Using CH model of Bell’s theorem and only by applying the conditional probability definition in ”classical ” probability theory,without imposing the locality condition,we are able to show that the stochastic realistic (CH) model cannot reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics. PACS number: 03.65.Bz It is generally claimed that Bell inequalities are inconsistent with experimental data and with the predictions of quantum mechanics.A condition often used in the derivation of Bell inequalities is the so-called locality condition.The temptation is to attribute Bell inequalities violation to the violation of locality. In this paper we are going

arXiv:quant-ph/9811072Nov 25, 19980 citations

QUANTUM MECHANICS AS BAYESIAN COMPLEX PROBABILITY THEORY

Saul Youssef

As a possible alternative to conventional quantum mechanics, the Bayesian version of probability theory is extended to include complex probabilities. An additional assumption of realism restores a frequency interpretation while coexisting with Bell’s theorem. Such complex probabilities are shown to have a superposition principle, to include wave functions which are expansions in eigenfunctions of Hermitian operators, to have a path-integral representation and to describe both pure and mixed systems. A scalar particle in Rd is shown to obey the Schrödinger equation with mass, vector potential and metric appearing as moments of a fundamental probability. Illustrative examples are given. The quantum version of Bayesian inference is discussed.

arXiv:hep-th/9307019Modern Physics Letters ASep 14, 199457 citations

A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

Andrea Aiello

Bell's theorem proves the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and local realistic hidden-variable theories. In this paper we show that, contrary to a common belief, the theoretical proof of Bell's theorem is not affected by counterfactual reasoning. Then, we demonstrate that the experimental verification of this theorem may be affected in an unknowable way by our ignorance about the probability distribution of the hidden variables. Our study is based on the standard theory of random variables, and lays the groundwork for a critical rethinking of Bell's theorem and its consequences.

arXiv:2412.17857Dec 20, 20240 citations

Bayes + Hilbert = Quantum Mechanics

Alessio Benavoli, Alessandro Facchini, Marco Zaffalon A

We consider the problem of gambling on a quantum experiment and enforce rational behaviour by a few rules. These rules yield, in the classical case, the Bayesian theory of probability via duality theorems. In our quantum setting, they yield the Bayesian theory generalised to the space of Hermitian matrices. This very theory is quantum mechanics: in fact, we derive all its four postulates from the generalised Bayesian theory. This implies that quantum mechanics is self-consistent. It also leads us to reinterpret the main operations in quantum mechanics as probability rules: Bayes' rule (measurement), marginalisation (partial tracing), independence (tensor product). To say it with a slogan, we obtain that quantum mechanics is the Bayesian theory in the complex numbers.

May 26, 20160 citations

Collapse of Bell’s Theorem

Guangye Chen

Bell’s theorem founded on Bell’s inequalities asserts that no local realistic theories can reproduce all quantum mechanical predictions for spin correlation of particle pairs. It is pointed out that the assumption of setting-independent probability makes Bell’s inequalities not impose constraint on all local realistic models and thus constitutes a theoretical loophole of Bell’s theorem. A counterexample is presented by showing that a local realistic model with appropriate probability density reproduces all quantum mechanical predictions. It becomes clear that experiments violate Bell’s inequalities because the real correlation functions are not constrained by these inequalities. It is also exposed that, rigorous logical reasoning of counter factual deduction does not permit to exclude any premises of Bell’s inequalities by a certain amount of experimental violations of these inequalities.