Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Eavesdropping of two-way coherent-state quantum cryptography via gaussian quantum cloning machines

Stefano Pirandola, Stefano Mancini, Seth Lloyd, Samuel L. Braunstein

Published Feb 1, 2009• 4 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We consider one of the quantum key distribution protocols recently introduced in Ref. [Pirandola et al., Nature Phys. 4, 726 (2008)]. This protocol consists of a two-way quantum communication between Alice and Bob, where Alice encodes secret information via a random phase-space displacement of a coherent state. In particular, we study its security against a specific class of individual attacks which are based on combinations of Gaussian quantum cloning machines.

Related papers

Eavesdropping of Two-Way Coherent-State Quantum Cryptography via Gaussian Quantum Cloning Machines

Stefano Pirandola, Stefano Mancini, Seth Lloyd +1 more

We consider one of the quantum key distribution protocols recently introduced in Ref. [Pirandola et al., Nature Phys. 4, 726 (2008)]. This protocol consists of a two-way quantum communication between Alice and Bob, where Alice encodes secret information via a random phase-space displacement of a coherent state. In particular, we study its security against a specific class of individual attacks which are based on combinations of Gaussian quantum cloning machines.

arXiv:0901.3568•International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies (ICQNM)•Feb 1, 2009•4 citations

Continuous Variable Quantum Cryptography Using Coherent States

Frédéric Grosshans, Philippe Grangier

We propose several methods for quantum key distribution (QKD) based on the generation and transmission of random distributions of coherent or squeezed states, and we show that they are secure against individual eavesdropping attacks. These protocols require that the transmission of the optical line between Alice and Bob is larger than 50%, but they do not rely on "sub-shot-noise" features such as squeezing. Their security is a direct consequence of the no-cloning theorem, which limits the signal-to-noise ratio of possible quantum measurements on the transmission line. Our approach can also be used for evaluating various QKD protocols using light with Gaussian statistics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0109084•Physical Review Letters•Jan 16, 2002•1,470 citations

Two-way Gaussian quantum cryptography against coherent attacks in direct reconciliation

Carlo Ottaviani, Stefano Mancini, Stefano Pirandola

We consider a two-way quantum cryptographic protocol with coherent states assuming direct reconciliation. A detailed security analysis is performed considering a two-mode coherent attack, which represents the residual eavesdropping once the parties have reduced the general attack by applying symmetric random permutations. In this context we provide a general analytical expression for the key rate, discussing the impact of the residual two-mode correlations on the security of the scheme. In particular, we identify the optimal eavesdropping against two-way quantum communication, which is given by a two-mode coherent attack with symmetric and separable correlations.

arXiv:1512.05351•Physical Review A•Dec 11, 2015•44 citations

Gaussian two-mode attacks in one-way quantum cryptography

Carlo Ottaviani, Stefano Mancini, Stefano Pirandola

We investigate the asymptotic security of one-way continuous variable quantum key distribution against Gaussian two-mode coherent attacks. The one-way protocol is implemented by arranging the channel uses in two-mode blocks. By applying symmetric random permutations over these blocks, the security analysis is in fact reduced to study two-mode coherent attacks and, in particular, Gaussian ones, due to the extremality of Gaussian states. We explicitly show that the use of two-mode Gaussian correlations by an eavesdropper leads to asymptotic secret key rates which are strictly larger than the rate obtained under standard single-mode Gaussian attacks.

arXiv:1703.07683•Physical Review A•May 3, 2017•15 citations

General immunity and superadditivity of two-way Gaussian quantum cryptography

Carlo Ottaviani, Stefano Pirandola

We consider two-way continuous-variable quantum key distribution, studying its security against general eavesdropping strategies. Assuming the asymptotic limit of many signals exchanged, we prove that two-way Gaussian protocols are immune to coherent attacks. More precisely we show the general superadditivity of the two-way security thresholds, which are proven to be higher than the corresponding one-way counterparts in all cases. We perform the security analysis first reducing the general eavesdropping to a two-mode coherent Gaussian attack, and then showing that the superadditivity is achieved by exploiting the random on/off switching of the two-way quantum communication. This allows the parties to choose the appropriate communication instances to prepare the key, accordingly to the tomography of the quantum channel. The random opening and closing of the circuit represents, in fact, an additional degree of freedom allowing the parties to convert, a posteriori, the two-mode correlations of the eavesdropping into noise. The eavesdropper is assumed to have no access to the on/off switching and, indeed, cannot adapt her attack. We explicitly prove that this mechanism enhances the security performance, no matter if the eavesdropper performs collective or coherent attacks.

arXiv:1603.01270•Scientific Reports•Mar 1, 2016•44 citations

A quantum key distribution on qudits using quantum operators

Wachirapong Jirakitpuwapat, Poom Kumam, Tanapat Deesuwan +1 more

Cryptography is processing for securing communication between two people. The opponent wants to know the message that is encrypted using a secret key. Although the opponent can eavesdrop the message sent between the sender and the receiver, the opponent is unable to decrypt to read the message. Therefore, the secret key is very important. The sender and the receiver agree with the secret key in an insecure channel by using key distribution protocol such as the Diffie–Hellman protocol. Since quantum computer is coming soon, Diffie–Hellman protocol is not secure. We will develop a quantum key distribution protocol. The benefit of the quantum system is the quantum state that cannot copy by no‐cloning theorem. Thus, the opponent does not copy and keeps the message that is quantum. In this paper, a novel quantum key distribution protocol between two people (Alice and Bob) based on quantum operators is developed. The opponent (Eve) wants to know the secret key. Although Eve knows this quantum key distribution protocol, Eve does not behave similarly to Alice and Bob. For example, Eve eavesdrops Alice's quantum state that was sent to Bob, and Eve sends another quantum state. Therefore, we cannot control Eve's behavior. So we give the upper bound of mutual information between the user and opponent by using Holevo's bound. We verify the usual security definition for quantum key distribution that is equality‐and‐uniformity and privacy in the mutual information sense.

Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences•Nov 5, 2020•3 citations
We consider one of the quantum key distribution protocols recently introduced in Ref. [Pirandola et al., Nature Phys. 4, 726 (2008)]. This protocol consists of a two-way quantum communication between Alice and Bob, where Alice encodes secret information via a random phase-space displacement of a coherent state. In particular, we study its security against a specific class of individual attacks which are based on combinations of Gaussian quantum cloning machines.
We propose several methods for quantum key distribution (QKD) based on the generation and transmission of random distributions of coherent or squeezed states, and we show that they are secure against individual eavesdropping attacks. These protocols require that the transmission of the optical line between Alice and Bob is larger than 50%, but they do not rely on "sub-shot-noise" features such as squeezing. Their security is a direct consequence of the no-cloning theorem, which limits the signal-to-noise ratio of possible quantum measurements on the transmission line. Our approach can also be used for evaluating various QKD protocols using light with Gaussian statistics.
We consider a two-way quantum cryptographic protocol with coherent states assuming direct reconciliation. A detailed security analysis is performed considering a two-mode coherent attack, which represents the residual eavesdropping once the parties have reduced the general attack by applying symmetric random permutations. In this context we provide a general analytical expression for the key rate, discussing the impact of the residual two-mode correlations on the security of the scheme. In particular, we identify the optimal eavesdropping against two-way quantum communication, which is given by a two-mode coherent attack with symmetric and separable correlations.
We investigate the asymptotic security of one-way continuous variable quantum key distribution against Gaussian two-mode coherent attacks. The one-way protocol is implemented by arranging the channel uses in two-mode blocks. By applying symmetric random permutations over these blocks, the security analysis is in fact reduced to study two-mode coherent attacks and, in particular, Gaussian ones, due to the extremality of Gaussian states. We explicitly show that the use of two-mode Gaussian correlations by an eavesdropper leads to asymptotic secret key rates which are strictly larger than the rate obtained under standard single-mode Gaussian attacks.
We consider two-way continuous-variable quantum key distribution, studying its security against general eavesdropping strategies. Assuming the asymptotic limit of many signals exchanged, we prove that two-way Gaussian protocols are immune to coherent attacks. More precisely we show the general superadditivity of the two-way security thresholds, which are proven to be higher than the corresponding one-way counterparts in all cases. We perform the security analysis first reducing the general eavesdropping to a two-mode coherent Gaussian attack, and then showing that the superadditivity is achieved by exploiting the random on/off switching of the two-way quantum communication. This allows the parties to choose the appropriate communication instances to prepare the key, accordingly to the tomography of the quantum channel. The random opening and closing of the circuit represents, in fact, an additional degree of freedom allowing the parties to convert, a posteriori, the two-mode correlations of the eavesdropping into noise. The eavesdropper is assumed to have no access to the on/off switching and, indeed, cannot adapt her attack. We explicitly prove that this mechanism enhances the security performance, no matter if the eavesdropper performs collective or coherent attacks.
Cryptography is processing for securing communication between two people. The opponent wants to know the message that is encrypted using a secret key. Although the opponent can eavesdrop the message sent between the sender and the receiver, the opponent is unable to decrypt to read the message. Therefore, the secret key is very important. The sender and the receiver agree with the secret key in an insecure channel by using key distribution protocol such as the Diffie–Hellman protocol. Since quantum computer is coming soon, Diffie–Hellman protocol is not secure. We will develop a quantum key distribution protocol. The benefit of the quantum system is the quantum state that cannot copy by no‐cloning theorem. Thus, the opponent does not copy and keeps the message that is quantum. In this paper, a novel quantum key distribution protocol between two people (Alice and Bob) based on quantum operators is developed. The opponent (Eve) wants to know the secret key. Although Eve knows this quantum key distribution protocol, Eve does not behave similarly to Alice and Bob. For example, Eve eavesdrops Alice's quantum state that was sent to Bob, and Eve sends another quantum state. Therefore, we cannot control Eve's behavior. So we give the upper bound of mutual information between the user and opponent by using Holevo's bound. We verify the usual security definition for quantum key distribution that is equality‐and‐uniformity and privacy in the mutual information sense.