Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

1 Photonic Astronomy and Quantum Optics

Dainis Dravins, See Profile, Dainis Dravins

Published Jan 1, 2008• 11 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Abstract Quantum optics potentially offers an information channel from the Uni-verse beyond the established ones of imaging and spectroscopy. All existing cam-eras and all spectrometers measure aspects of the first-order spatial and/or temporal coherence of light. However, light has additional degrees of freedom, manifest in the statistics of photon arrival times, or in the amount of photon orbital angular mo-mentum. Such quantum-optical measures may carry information on how the light was created at the source, and whether it reached the observer directly or via some intermediate process. Astronomical quantum optics may help to clarify emission processes in natural laser sources and in the environments of compact objects, while high-speed photon-counting with digital signal handling enables multi-element and long-baseline versions of the intensity interferometer. Time resolutions of nanosec-onds are required, as are large photon fluxes, making photonic astronomy very timely in an era of large telescopes. 1 What Is Observed in Astronomy? Almost all of astronomy depends on the interpretation of properties of electromag-netic radiation (“light”) from celestial sources. The sole exceptions are neutrino detections; gravitational-wave searches; analyses of cosmic rays, meteorites, and other extraterrestrial materials; and in-situ studies of solar-system bodies. All our other understanding of the Universe rests upon observing and interpreting more or less subtle properties in the light reaching us from celestial bodies. Astronomical telescopes are equipped with myriads of auxiliary instruments which, on first sight, may give an impression of being vastly different. However, a closer examination of the underlying physical principles reveals that they all are measuring either the spatial or temporal [first-order] coherence of light (or perhaps some combination of these). All imaging devices (cameras, interferometers) are studying aspects of the spatial coherence (in various directions, and for different angular extents on the sky). All spectrally analyzing devices measure aspects of the

Related papers

Astronomical quantum optics with Extremely Large Telescopes

Dainis Dravins, C. Barbieri, R. A. E. Fosbury +6 more

Modern optics focuses on photonics and quantum optics, studying individual photons and statistics of photon streams. Those can be complex and carry information beyond that recorded by imaging, spectroscopy, polarimetry or interferometry. Since [almost] all astronomy is based upon the interpretation of subtleties in the light from astronomical sources, quantum optics has the potential of becoming another information channel from the Universe. The observability of quantum statistics increases rapidly with telescope size making photonic astronomy very timely in an era of very large telescopes.

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union•Nov 1, 2005•11 citations

Quantum Optics in Astrophysics: The Potential of a New Window

Nikolaos H. Solomos

The entire optical astronomy relies upon the detection of light. In this contribution, we put emphasis to the fact that a new window to the universe could be opened with the obvious idea of applying the …Quantum Theory to describe incoming light Quanta (!). It is clearly the appropriate approach but, nevertheless, it never deemed necessary in main stream astrophysics: Customarily, traditional astronomy not only prefers time‐averaged quantities, (although fluctuations in time of a measurement can be a source of information which is getting entirely lost in any time‐averaged value) but misses much more information content by continuing to use old semi‐classical approaches to treat photon detection processes. Thus, we fail to describe and appreciate in full very important properties of cosmic light, like spatiotemporal coherence. Nevertheless, 45 years of knowledge accumulation in Quantum Optics and technology can now result to the development of instruments capable to extract intimate quantum information scrambled in the incoming optical light fields from celestial sources, provided their ability to detect light emission alterations in the <ns timescales, can be demonstrated. In the emerging field of Quantum or “Photonic” Astrophysics (QAp) random fluctuations of light are not considered undesirable as unavoidable photon‐noise that hampers the photometrical precision, but, instead, as a subject of investigation per se. Such light fluctuations can frequently be valuable as a rich source of information. Statistical fluctuations, are able to provide radically new diagnostic methods of physical conditions in astrophysical plasmas by directly identifying characteristic quantum signatures of light‐generating or light‐scattering processes. However, it has to be noted that, close enough to the quantum limit, the bosonic character of photon cannot be ignored and, therefore, a detailed Quantum Electrodynamical treatment of the interaction of the incoming photon stream with every component comprising the chain of physical systems from the source to the detecting instrument, has to be elaborated. To propagate the main ideas regarding the framework of QAp is not an easy task. Here, summarize the conceptual foundations and experimental aspects of such a new information channel and then describe the main strategy aspects, to develop the subject. We discuss also, briefly, the scientific rationale, prospects and difficulties of the above mentioned instruments and describe the aims of our key‐program to contribute in their realization.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Quantum telescopes

Daniel Gottesman

In optical and IR wavelengths, typical astronomical sources have only one or a few photons arriving at a time, meaning the light is really a quantum object. This makes interferometry over longer baselines a major challenge, requiring a truly quantum interference measurement between distant elements in the array rather than local measurements which can be combined later. Luckily, our ability to manipulate and preserve quantum states has taken major strides forward in the last few decades with the rise of quantum information technologies. I will explain how entangled quantum states and a technology called "quantum repeaters" can make possible telescope arrays with much longer baselines than existing facilities, and discuss progress towards making such quantum telescopes a reality.

SPIE Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging•Dec 12, 2020•0 citations

An Introduction to Quantum Optics: Photon and Biphoton Physics

Yanhua H. Shih

Electromagnetic Wave Theory and Measurement of Light Electromagnetic Wave Theory of Light Classical Superposition Measurement of Light Intensity of Light: Expectation and Fluctuation Measurement of Intensity: Ensemble Average and Time Average Coherence Property of Light-The State of the Radiation Coherence Property of Light Temporal Coherence Spatial Coherence Diffraction and Propagation Diffraction Field Propagation Optical Imaging A Classic Imaging System Fourier Transform via a Lens First-Order Coherence of Light First-Order Temporal Coherence First-Order Spatial Coherence Second-Order Coherence of Light Second-Order Coherence of Coherent Light Second-Order Correlation of Chaotic-Thermal Radiation and the HBT Interferometer The Physical Cause of the HBT Phenomenon Near-Field Second-Order Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Nth-Order Coherence of Light Nth-Order Near-Field Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Homodyne Detection and Heterodyne Detection of Light Optical Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne Detection of Independent and Coupled Thermal Fields Quantum Theory of Light: Field Quantization and Measurement The Experimental Foundation-Part I: Blackbody Radiation The Experimental Foundation-Part II: Photoelectric Effect The Light Quantum and the Field Quantization Photon Number State of Radiation Field Coherent State of Radiation Field Density Operator and Density Matrix Composite System and Two-Photon State of Radiation Field A Simple Model of Incoherent and Coherent Radiation Source Pure State and Mixed State Product State, Entangled State, and Mixed State of Photon Pairs Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory Measurement of Light: Photon Counting Measurement of Light: Joint Detection of Photons Field Propagation in Space-Time Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence Quantum Degree of First-Order Coherence Photon and Effective Wavefunction Measurement of the First-Order Coherence or Correlation Quantum Degree of Second-Order Coherence Two-Photon Interference vs. Statistical Correlation of Intensity Fluctuations Second-Order Spatial Correlation of Thermal Light Photon Counting and Measurement of G(2) Quantum Entanglement EPR Experiment and EPR State Product State, Entangled State, and Classically Correlated State Entangled States in Spin Variables Entangled Biphoton State EPR Correlation of Entangled Biphoton System Subsystem in an Entangled Two-Photon State Biphoton in Dispersive Media Quantum Imaging Biphoton Imaging Ghost Imaging Ghost Imaging and Uncertainty Relation Thermal Light Ghost Imaging Classical Simulation of Ghost Imaging Turbulence-Free Ghost Imaging Two-Photon Interferometry I: Biphoton Interference Is Two-Photon Interference the Interference of Two Photons? Two-Photon Interference with Orthogonal Polarization Franson Interferometer Two-Photon Ghost Interference Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Two-Photon Interferometry II: Quantum Interference of Chaotic Light Two-Photon Young's Interference Two-Photon Anticorrelation with Incoherent Chaotic Light Two-Photon Interference with Incoherent Orthogonal Polarized Chaotic Light Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Measurement Hidden Variable Theory and Quantum Calculation for the Measurement of Spin 1/2 Bohm State Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Bell States Bell State Preparation

•Jan 24, 2011•40 citations

Ruling the Waves

Ian S. Osborne, Robert Coontz

T hink about coherent systems, and odds are that the first example to cross your mind will be a laser: a device that emits monochromatic light homogenized so that the photons propagate with their phase in lockstep. The well-defined wavefront of the laser beam makes it possible to focus the light to spot sizes on the order of the wavelength of the light without the aberrations usually observed with the random wavefront of incoherent light. The well-defined phase also provides a medium capable of storing and carrying information more efficiently than the intensity-modulated signals typical of incoherent sources. These useful properties of coherence have made lasers almost ubiquitous in science and technology, and that “almost” is shrinking by the day. In general, coherence comes about when individual components of a system act in unison, either in phase or with a fixed phase difference between the components. More accurately, the system can be described as a local oscillator whose wavefunction contains phase and amplitude terms that define how the system evolves in space and time. The collection of articles in this special issue describes the recent progress and developments of coherence in optical, atomic, and semiconductor systems, and how manipulating that coherence may lead to useful applications and to experimental systems for studying the elements of quantum mechanics. Since the first demonstration of the laser in 1960, progress in improving the extent of the spatial and temporal coherence of laser light has been steady. Psaltis (p. [1359][1]) reviews developments in optical coherence and highlights examples of the key role coherence has played in applications in imaging, communication, and information processing and storage. Just as lasers revolutionized the field of optics, many researchers have high expectations that other coherent systems will provide similar advances in their respective fields. Exploiting the fundamental tenet of quantum mechanics whereby particles have the properties of waves, Kasevich (p. [1363][2]) reviews coherence effects in collections of cold atoms and describes how the shorter wavelengths associated with atoms and the recent accessibility of bright coherent atom sources may lead to precision measurements beyond anything currently available to the optical regime. For integration and potential applications, the ideal system would be based in semiconductors. Snoke (p. [1368][3]) describes recent work toward the formation of coherent semiconductor systems. With coherence in the atomic and optical systems generally comprising macroscopic systems, Mabuchi and Doherty (p. [1372][4]) look at coherence effects at the quantum limit, probing the interactions between single atoms and single photons confined to high-quality cavities. In addition to providing invaluable information on the limits of quantum mechanics, such effects might also shed new light on information science in the quantum regime. The section opens with a pair of News features by staff writers Charles Seife and Robert Service. Seife presents a smattering of common applications that scientists and engineers have found for coherent waves, whether in light, sound, or subatomic particles. Service describes efforts to create new coherent sources of the type of radiation known as “hard” x-rays—a long-sought range of high frequencies with enormous potential for scientific research, technology, and medicine. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078823 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1079430 [3]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078082 [4]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078446

Science•Nov 14, 2002•38 citations

Measuring gravitational lensing time delays with quantum information processing

Zhenning Liu, William DeRocco, Shiming Gu +6 more

The gravitational fields of astrophysical bodies bend the light around them, creating multiple paths along which light from a distant source can arrive at Earth. Measuring the difference in photon arrival time along these different paths provides a means of determining the mass of the lensing system, which is otherwise difficult to constrain. This is particularly challenging in the case of microlensing, where the images produced by lensing cannot be individually resolved; existing proposals for detecting time delays in microlensed systems are significantly constrained due to the need for large photon flux and the loss of signal coherence when the angular diameter of the light source becomes too large. In this work, we propose a novel approach to measuring astrophysical time delays. Our method uses exponentially fewer photons than previous schemes, enabling observations that would otherwise be impossible. Our approach, which combines a quantum-inspired algorithm and quantum information processing technologies, saturates a provable lower bound on the number of photons required to find the time delay. Our scheme has multiple applications: we explore its use both in calibrating optical interferometric telescopes and in making direct mass measurements of ongoing microlensing events. To demonstrate the latter, we present a fiducial example of microlensed stellar flares sources in the Galactic Bulge. Though the number of photons produced by such events is small, we show that our photon-efficient scheme opens the possibility of directly measuring microlensing time delays using existing and near-future ground-based telescopes.

arXiv:2510.07898•Oct 9, 2025•0 citations
Abstract Quantum optics potentially offers an information channel from the Uni-verse beyond the established ones of imaging and spectroscopy. All existing cam-eras and all spectrometers measure aspects of the first-order spatial and/or temporal coherence of light. However, light has additional degrees of freedom, manifest in the statistics of photon arrival times, or in the amount of photon orbital angular mo-mentum. Such quantum-optical measures may carry information on how the light was created at the source, and whether it reached the observer directly or via some intermediate process. Astronomical quantum optics may help to clarify emission processes in natural laser sources and in the environments of compact objects, while high-speed photon-counting with digital signal handling enables multi-element and long-baseline versions of the intensity interferometer. Time resolutions of nanosec-onds are required, as are large photon fluxes, making photonic astronomy very timely in an era of large telescopes. 1 What Is Observed in Astronomy? Almost all of astronomy depends on the interpretation of properties of electromag-netic radiation (“light”) from celestial sources. The sole exceptions are neutrino detections; gravitational-wave searches; analyses of cosmic rays, meteorites, and other extraterrestrial materials; and in-situ studies of solar-system bodies. All our other understanding of the Universe rests upon observing and interpreting more or less subtle properties in the light reaching us from celestial bodies. Astronomical telescopes are equipped with myriads of auxiliary instruments which, on first sight, may give an impression of being vastly different. However, a closer examination of the underlying physical principles reveals that they all are measuring either the spatial or temporal [first-order] coherence of light (or perhaps some combination of these). All imaging devices (cameras, interferometers) are studying aspects of the spatial coherence (in various directions, and for different angular extents on the sky). All spectrally analyzing devices measure aspects of the
Modern optics focuses on photonics and quantum optics, studying individual photons and statistics of photon streams. Those can be complex and carry information beyond that recorded by imaging, spectroscopy, polarimetry or interferometry. Since [almost] all astronomy is based upon the interpretation of subtleties in the light from astronomical sources, quantum optics has the potential of becoming another information channel from the Universe. The observability of quantum statistics increases rapidly with telescope size making photonic astronomy very timely in an era of very large telescopes.
The entire optical astronomy relies upon the detection of light. In this contribution, we put emphasis to the fact that a new window to the universe could be opened with the obvious idea of applying the …Quantum Theory to describe incoming light Quanta (!). It is clearly the appropriate approach but, nevertheless, it never deemed necessary in main stream astrophysics: Customarily, traditional astronomy not only prefers time‐averaged quantities, (although fluctuations in time of a measurement can be a source of information which is getting entirely lost in any time‐averaged value) but misses much more information content by continuing to use old semi‐classical approaches to treat photon detection processes. Thus, we fail to describe and appreciate in full very important properties of cosmic light, like spatiotemporal coherence. Nevertheless, 45 years of knowledge accumulation in Quantum Optics and technology can now result to the development of instruments capable to extract intimate quantum information scrambled in the incoming optical light fields from celestial sources, provided their ability to detect light emission alterations in the <ns timescales, can be demonstrated. In the emerging field of Quantum or “Photonic” Astrophysics (QAp) random fluctuations of light are not considered undesirable as unavoidable photon‐noise that hampers the photometrical precision, but, instead, as a subject of investigation per se. Such light fluctuations can frequently be valuable as a rich source of information. Statistical fluctuations, are able to provide radically new diagnostic methods of physical conditions in astrophysical plasmas by directly identifying characteristic quantum signatures of light‐generating or light‐scattering processes. However, it has to be noted that, close enough to the quantum limit, the bosonic character of photon cannot be ignored and, therefore, a detailed Quantum Electrodynamical treatment of the interaction of the incoming photon stream with every component comprising the chain of physical systems from the source to the detecting instrument, has to be elaborated. To propagate the main ideas regarding the framework of QAp is not an easy task. Here, summarize the conceptual foundations and experimental aspects of such a new information channel and then describe the main strategy aspects, to develop the subject. We discuss also, briefly, the scientific rationale, prospects and difficulties of the above mentioned instruments and describe the aims of our key‐program to contribute in their realization.
In optical and IR wavelengths, typical astronomical sources have only one or a few photons arriving at a time, meaning the light is really a quantum object. This makes interferometry over longer baselines a major challenge, requiring a truly quantum interference measurement between distant elements in the array rather than local measurements which can be combined later. Luckily, our ability to manipulate and preserve quantum states has taken major strides forward in the last few decades with the rise of quantum information technologies. I will explain how entangled quantum states and a technology called "quantum repeaters" can make possible telescope arrays with much longer baselines than existing facilities, and discuss progress towards making such quantum telescopes a reality.
Electromagnetic Wave Theory and Measurement of Light Electromagnetic Wave Theory of Light Classical Superposition Measurement of Light Intensity of Light: Expectation and Fluctuation Measurement of Intensity: Ensemble Average and Time Average Coherence Property of Light-The State of the Radiation Coherence Property of Light Temporal Coherence Spatial Coherence Diffraction and Propagation Diffraction Field Propagation Optical Imaging A Classic Imaging System Fourier Transform via a Lens First-Order Coherence of Light First-Order Temporal Coherence First-Order Spatial Coherence Second-Order Coherence of Light Second-Order Coherence of Coherent Light Second-Order Correlation of Chaotic-Thermal Radiation and the HBT Interferometer The Physical Cause of the HBT Phenomenon Near-Field Second-Order Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Nth-Order Coherence of Light Nth-Order Near-Field Spatial Coherence of Thermal Light Homodyne Detection and Heterodyne Detection of Light Optical Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne and Heterodyne Detection Balanced Homodyne Detection of Independent and Coupled Thermal Fields Quantum Theory of Light: Field Quantization and Measurement The Experimental Foundation-Part I: Blackbody Radiation The Experimental Foundation-Part II: Photoelectric Effect The Light Quantum and the Field Quantization Photon Number State of Radiation Field Coherent State of Radiation Field Density Operator and Density Matrix Composite System and Two-Photon State of Radiation Field A Simple Model of Incoherent and Coherent Radiation Source Pure State and Mixed State Product State, Entangled State, and Mixed State of Photon Pairs Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory Measurement of Light: Photon Counting Measurement of Light: Joint Detection of Photons Field Propagation in Space-Time Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence Quantum Degree of First-Order Coherence Photon and Effective Wavefunction Measurement of the First-Order Coherence or Correlation Quantum Degree of Second-Order Coherence Two-Photon Interference vs. Statistical Correlation of Intensity Fluctuations Second-Order Spatial Correlation of Thermal Light Photon Counting and Measurement of G(2) Quantum Entanglement EPR Experiment and EPR State Product State, Entangled State, and Classically Correlated State Entangled States in Spin Variables Entangled Biphoton State EPR Correlation of Entangled Biphoton System Subsystem in an Entangled Two-Photon State Biphoton in Dispersive Media Quantum Imaging Biphoton Imaging Ghost Imaging Ghost Imaging and Uncertainty Relation Thermal Light Ghost Imaging Classical Simulation of Ghost Imaging Turbulence-Free Ghost Imaging Two-Photon Interferometry I: Biphoton Interference Is Two-Photon Interference the Interference of Two Photons? Two-Photon Interference with Orthogonal Polarization Franson Interferometer Two-Photon Ghost Interference Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Two-Photon Interferometry II: Quantum Interference of Chaotic Light Two-Photon Young's Interference Two-Photon Anticorrelation with Incoherent Chaotic Light Two-Photon Interference with Incoherent Orthogonal Polarized Chaotic Light Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Measurement Hidden Variable Theory and Quantum Calculation for the Measurement of Spin 1/2 Bohm State Bell's Theorem and Bell's Inequality Bell States Bell State Preparation
T hink about coherent systems, and odds are that the first example to cross your mind will be a laser: a device that emits monochromatic light homogenized so that the photons propagate with their phase in lockstep. The well-defined wavefront of the laser beam makes it possible to focus the light to spot sizes on the order of the wavelength of the light without the aberrations usually observed with the random wavefront of incoherent light. The well-defined phase also provides a medium capable of storing and carrying information more efficiently than the intensity-modulated signals typical of incoherent sources. These useful properties of coherence have made lasers almost ubiquitous in science and technology, and that “almost” is shrinking by the day. In general, coherence comes about when individual components of a system act in unison, either in phase or with a fixed phase difference between the components. More accurately, the system can be described as a local oscillator whose wavefunction contains phase and amplitude terms that define how the system evolves in space and time. The collection of articles in this special issue describes the recent progress and developments of coherence in optical, atomic, and semiconductor systems, and how manipulating that coherence may lead to useful applications and to experimental systems for studying the elements of quantum mechanics. Since the first demonstration of the laser in 1960, progress in improving the extent of the spatial and temporal coherence of laser light has been steady. Psaltis (p. [1359][1]) reviews developments in optical coherence and highlights examples of the key role coherence has played in applications in imaging, communication, and information processing and storage. Just as lasers revolutionized the field of optics, many researchers have high expectations that other coherent systems will provide similar advances in their respective fields. Exploiting the fundamental tenet of quantum mechanics whereby particles have the properties of waves, Kasevich (p. [1363][2]) reviews coherence effects in collections of cold atoms and describes how the shorter wavelengths associated with atoms and the recent accessibility of bright coherent atom sources may lead to precision measurements beyond anything currently available to the optical regime. For integration and potential applications, the ideal system would be based in semiconductors. Snoke (p. [1368][3]) describes recent work toward the formation of coherent semiconductor systems. With coherence in the atomic and optical systems generally comprising macroscopic systems, Mabuchi and Doherty (p. [1372][4]) look at coherence effects at the quantum limit, probing the interactions between single atoms and single photons confined to high-quality cavities. In addition to providing invaluable information on the limits of quantum mechanics, such effects might also shed new light on information science in the quantum regime. The section opens with a pair of News features by staff writers Charles Seife and Robert Service. Seife presents a smattering of common applications that scientists and engineers have found for coherent waves, whether in light, sound, or subatomic particles. Service describes efforts to create new coherent sources of the type of radiation known as “hard” x-rays—a long-sought range of high frequencies with enormous potential for scientific research, technology, and medicine. [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078823 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1079430 [3]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078082 [4]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1078446
The gravitational fields of astrophysical bodies bend the light around them, creating multiple paths along which light from a distant source can arrive at Earth. Measuring the difference in photon arrival time along these different paths provides a means of determining the mass of the lensing system, which is otherwise difficult to constrain. This is particularly challenging in the case of microlensing, where the images produced by lensing cannot be individually resolved; existing proposals for detecting time delays in microlensed systems are significantly constrained due to the need for large photon flux and the loss of signal coherence when the angular diameter of the light source becomes too large. In this work, we propose a novel approach to measuring astrophysical time delays. Our method uses exponentially fewer photons than previous schemes, enabling observations that would otherwise be impossible. Our approach, which combines a quantum-inspired algorithm and quantum information processing technologies, saturates a provable lower bound on the number of photons required to find the time delay. Our scheme has multiple applications: we explore its use both in calibrating optical interferometric telescopes and in making direct mass measurements of ongoing microlensing events. To demonstrate the latter, we present a fiducial example of microlensed stellar flares sources in the Galactic Bulge. Though the number of photons produced by such events is small, we show that our photon-efficient scheme opens the possibility of directly measuring microlensing time delays using existing and near-future ground-based telescopes.