Does gravity induce wavefunction collapse? An examination of Penrose's conjecture

Shan Gao

Published Mar 5, 2013• 6 citations

Abstract

According to Penrose, the fundamental conflict between the superposition principle of quantum mechanics and the principle of general covariance of general relativity entails the existence of wavefunction collapse, e.g. a quantum superposition of two different space-time geometries will collapse to one of them due to the ill-definedness of the time-translation operator for the superposition. In this paper, we argue that Penrose's conjecture on gravity's role in wavefunction collapse is debatable. First of all, it is still a controversial issue what the exact nature of the conflict is and how to resolve it. Secondly, Penrose's argument by analogy is too weak to establish a necessary connection between wavefunction collapse and the conflict as understood by him. Thirdly, the conflict does not necessarily lead to wavefunction collapse. For the conflict or the problem of ill-definedness for a superposition of different space-time geometries also needs to be solved before the collapse of the superposition finishes, and once the conflict has been resolved, the wavefunction collapse will lose its physical basis relating to the conflict. In addition, we argue that Penrose's suggestions for the collapse time formula and the preferred basis are also problematic.

Related papers

Does gravity induce wavefunction collapse? An examination of Penrose's argument

Shan Gao

According to Penrose, the fundamental conflict between the superposition principle of quantum mechanics and the general covariance principle of general relativity entails the existence of wavefunction collapse, e.g. a quantum superposition of two different space-time geometries will collapse to one of them due to the ill-definedness of the time-translation operator for the superposition. In this paper, we argue that Penrose's conjecture on gravity's role in wavefunction collapse is debatable. First of all, it is still a controversial issue what the exact nature of the conflict is and how to resolve it. Secondly, Penrose's argument by analogy is too weak to establish a necessary connection between wavefunction collapse and the conflict as understood by him. Thirdly, the conflict does not necessarily lead to wavefunction collapse. For the conflict or the problem of ill-definedness for a superposition of different space-time geometries also needs to be solved before the collapse of the superposition finishes, and once the conflict has been resolved, the wavefunction collapse will lose its physical basis relating to the conflict. In addition, we argue that Penrose's suggestions for the collapse time formula and collapse states are also problematic.

Jan 21, 20121 citation

Why the Quantum Must Yield to Gravity

Joy Christian

After providing an extensive overview of the conceptual elements – such as Einstein’s ‘hole argument ’ – that underpin Penrose’s proposal for gravitationally induced quantum state reduction, the proposal is constructively criticised. Penrose has suggested a mechanism for objective reduction of quantum states with postulated collapse time τ = ¯h/∆E, where ∆E is an ill-definedness in the gravitational self-energy stemming from the profound conflict between the principles of superposition and general covariance. Here it is argued that, even if Penrose’s overall conceptual scheme for the breakdown of quantum mechanics is unreservedly accepted, his formula for the collapse time of superpositions reduces to τ → ∞ (∆E → 0) in the strictly Newtonian regime, which is the domain of his proposed experiment to corroborate the effect. A suggestion is made to rectify this situation. In particular, recognising the cogency of Penrose’s reasoning in the domain of full ‘quantum gravity’, it is demonstrated that an appropriate experiment which could in principle corroborate his argued ‘macroscopic ’ breakdown of superpositions is not the one involving non-rotating mass distributions as he has suggested, but a Leggett-type SQUID or BEC

Sep 13, 201327 citations

Investigation of Gravity-Related Spontaneous Wave Function Collapse for Non-static Gravitational Field

Ali Rajaei, Majid Rahnama, Yousef Bahrampour

Diosi and Penrose have suggested a criterion for spontaneous wave function collapse. According to Penrose the profound conflict between the principle of superposition and general covariance entails the existence of reduction of quantum states, e.g. a quantum superposition of two different space–time geometries will collapse onto one of them. In his proposal, collapse time has an inverse relationship with ill-definedness in the gravitational self-energy, for the static gravitational fields. Anandan obtained the same result using the fluctuations of the connection of gravitational field. We show that in Newtonian limit of the superposition of a static and non-static gravitational field the results of the methods of Anandan and Penrose are different, but the numerical value of the extra term in Anandan’s approach, involving angular velocity, is not even considered in a case of practical interest. Then, we investigate the collapse time of the superposition of a static and non-static gravitational field.

Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions A ScienceJun 8, 20160 citations

Gravity-induced wavefunction-collapse in a temporally expanding spacetime

Garrelt Quandt-Wiese

A gravity-induced approach to wavefunction collapse based on semiclassical gravity is enhanced by the hypothesis of a temporally expanding spacetime, which leads to a collapse model that can resolve the conflict between quantum nonlocality and relativity. It is postulated that the spacetime region on which the evolution of the state vector exists is bounded towards the future by a border that is dynamically moving towards the future, and at which the state vector must fulfil a boundary condition. Wavefunction collapse is represented in such a way that the evolution of the state vector changes abruptly at critical spacetime expansions to an evolution resembling a classical trajectory. This can explain the correlations in EPR experiments without coming into conflict with relativity, since the evolution of the state vector before and after the abrupt change is governed solely by local physical laws. This model leads to the same lifetimes of superpositions as the gravity-based approaches of Diosi and Penrose, and is characterised by the facts that energy is conserved at collapse and that the reduction point in time does not vary statistically. Some unique features of the model are that it naturally leads to stochastic behaviour and that it can predict reduction probabilities. It explains why all experiments performed so far behave in agreement with Born's rule, due to a property that they have in common. This gives rise to new experiments for checking Born's rule, which can be realised in the short term.

arXiv:1701.01765Jan 2, 20170 citations

Towards a theory of wavefunction collapse Part 1: How the Diosi-Penrose criterion and Born's rule can be derived from semiclassical gravity, and how the criterion can be relativistically generalised with help of the Einstein-Hilbert action

Garrelt Quandt-Wiese

A new approach to wavefunction collapse is prepared by an analysis of semiclassical gravity. The fact that, in semiclassical gravity, superposed states must share a common classical spacetime geometry, even if they prefer (according to general relativity) differently curved spacetimes, leads to energy increases of the states, when their mass distributions are different. If one interprets these energy increases divided by Planck's constant as decay rates of the states, one obtains the lifetimes of superpositions according to the Diosi-Penrose criterion and reduction probabilities according to Born's rule. The derivation of Born's rule for two-state superpositions can be adapted to the typical quantum mechanical experiments with the help of a common property of these experiments. It is that they lead to never more than two different mass distributions at one location referring e.g. to the cases that a particle "is", or "is not", detected at the location. From the characteristic energy of the Diosi-Penrose criterion, an action is constructed whose relativistic generalisation becomes obvious by a decomposition of the Einstein-Hilbert action to the superposed states. In Part 2, semiclassical gravity is enhanced to the so-called Dynamical Spacetime approach to wavefunction collapse, which leads to a physical mechanism for collapse.

arXiv:1701.00343Jan 2, 20173 citations

Towards a theory of wavefunction collapse Part 2: Collapse as abrupt reconfigurations of wavefunction's evolution in a dynamically expanding spacetime

Garrelt Quandt-Wiese

A new approach to wavefunction collapse is proposed. The so-called Dynamical Spacetime approach enhances semiclassical gravity and enables it for an explanation of wavefunction collapse by postulating that the spacetime region on which quantum fields exist and on which the wavefunction's evolution can be regarded is bounded towards the future by a spacelike hypersurface, which is dynamically expanding towards the future. Collapse is displayed in the way that the wavefunction's evolution becomes unstable at certain critical expansions of spacetime, at which it reconfigures via a self-reinforcing mechanism quasi-abruptly to an evolution resembling a classical trajectory. Thereby, spacetime geometry changes in favour of the winning state, which causes the path of the other state to vanish by destructive interference. This mechanism for collapse can explain the quantum correlations in EPR experiments without coming into conflict with relativity and the Free Will theorem. The Dynamical Spacetime approach is mathematically formulated on basis of the Einstein-Hilbert action and predicts for the Newtonian limit the same lifetimes of superpositions as the gravity-based approaches of Diosi and Penrose. A second important feature of the Dynamical Spacetime approach is its capability to forecast reduction probabilities. It can explain why all experiments performed so-far confirm Born's rule, and predict deviations from it, when solids evolve into three-state superpositions. The basics needed for the derivations in this paper are developed in Part 1 by an analysis of semiclassical gravity.

Jan 2, 20173 citations