Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Noether theorem for Markov processes

John C. Baez, Brendan Fong

Published Jan 1, 2013• 35 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Noether's theorem links the symmetries of a quantum system with its conserved quantities, and is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. Here we prove a version of Noether's theorem for Markov processes. In quantum mechanics, an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if its expected value remains constant in time for every state. For Markov processes that no longer hold, but an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if both its expected value and standard deviation are constant in time for every state. © 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Related papers

A Noether theorem for Markov processes

John C. Baez, Brendan Fong

Noether's theorem links the symmetries of a quantum system with its conserved quantities, and is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. Here we prove a version of Noether's theorem for Markov processes. In quantum mechanics, an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if its expected value remains constant in time for every state. For Markov processes that no longer hold, but an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if both its expected value and standard deviation are constant in time for every state.

arXiv:1203.2035•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jan 1, 2013•32 citations

Noether’s theorem for dissipative quantum dynamical semi-groups

John Edward Gough, Tudor Stefan Ratiu, Oleg Georgievich Smolyanov

Noether’s theorem on constants of the motion of dynamical systems has recently been extended to classical dissipative systems (Markovian semi-groups) by Baez and Fong [J. Math. Phys. 54, 013301 (2013)]. We show how to extend these results to the fully quantum setting of quantum Markov dynamics. For finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, we construct a mapping from observables to completely positive maps that leads to the natural analogue of their criterion of commutativity with the infinitesimal generator of the Markov dynamics. Using standard results on the relaxation of states to equilibrium under quantum dynamical semi-groups, we are able to characterise the constants of the motion under quantum Markov evolutions in the infinite-dimensional setting under the usual assumption of existence of a stationary strictly positive density matrix. In particular, the Noether constants are identified with the fixed point of the Heisenberg picture semi-group.

arXiv:1410.7711•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 2015•20 citations

Getting to the Bottom of Noether’s Theorem

John C. Baez

This chapter examines the assumptions behind Noether’s theorem connecting symmetries and conservation laws, taking an algebraic approach to compare classical and quantum versions of this theorem. In both classical and quantum mechanics, observables are naturally elements of a Jordan algebra, while generators of one-parameter groups of transformations are naturally elements of a Lie algebra. Noether’s theorem holds whenever we can map observables to generators in such a way that each observable generates a one-parameter group that preserves itself. In ordinary complex quantum mechanics, this mapping is multiplication by the square root of ?1. In the more general framework of unital JB-algebras, Alfsen and Shultz call such a mapping a ‘dynamical correspondence’ and show its presence allows us to identify the unital JB-algebra with the self-adjoint part of a complex C*-algebra. However, to prove their result, they impose a second, more obscure, condition on the dynamical correspondence. This expresses a relation between quantum and statistical mechanics, closely connected to the principle that ‘inverse temperature is imaginary time’.

arXiv:2006.14741•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 31, 2022•10 citations

Framework for generalized Hamiltonian systems through reasonable postulates

Libo Jiang, Daniel R. Terno, Oscar Dahlsten

Hamiltonian mechanics describes the evolution of a system through its Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian typically also represents the energy observable, a Noether-conserved quantity associated with the time invariance of the law of evolution. In both quantum and classical mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics demands a precise relationship between time evolution and observable energy, albeit using slightly different terminology. We distill basic conditions satisfied in both quantum and classical mechanics, including canonical coordinate symmetries and inner product invariance. We express these conditions in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories, which includes generalizing the definition of energy eigenstates in terms of time-invariant properties of the Hamiltonian system. By postulating these conditions to hold, we derive a unified Hamiltonian system model. This unified framework describes quantum and classical mechanics in a consistent language, facilitating their comparison. We moreover discuss alternative theories: an equation of motion given by a mixture of commutation relations, an information-restricted version of quantum theory, and Spekken's toy theory. The findings give a deeper understanding of the Hamiltonian in quantum and classical theories and point to several potential research topics.

arXiv:2403.00038•Physical Review A•Mar 21, 2024•6 citations

Noether's theorem and dynamical groups in quantum mechanics

Octavio Castaños, Alejandro Frank, Ramón López–Peña

In contrast with the case of symmetry groups, no unique definition for the dynamical group generators of a given quantum Hamiltonian has been adopted in the literature. Following some work by Malkin and Man'ko (1965), Lipkin (1969), Dothan (1970) proposed a general definition based on the symmetry group of the corresponding time-dependent quantum mechanical equation of motion for the system. The authors show that this definition arises naturally from the quantum version of time dependent Noether symmetry transformations and derive the dynamical algebras for some simple examples.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Nov 21, 1990•21 citations

Symmetry and Conservation Laws

Tomáš Brauner

This chapter introduces the general concept of symmetry in both classical and quantum physics. The part devoted to classical physics stresses the importance of conservation laws and the role of Noether’s theorem for their understanding. A fairly general discussion of Noether’s theorem is offered, including ambiguities in the definition of the Noether current, possible existence of generalized, tensor conservation laws, and the inverse of Noether’s theorem. The Hamiltonian formalism is then used to motivate the transition from classical to quantum physics, and the definition of symmetry in the latter. In anticipation of the discussion of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the following chapter, the text here emphasizes the difference between implementing symmetry in terms of transformations on the algebra of physical observables, and in terms of unitary mappings on the Hilbert space of states.

Lecture notes in physics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations
Noether's theorem links the symmetries of a quantum system with its conserved quantities, and is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. Here we prove a version of Noether's theorem for Markov processes. In quantum mechanics, an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if its expected value remains constant in time for every state. For Markov processes that no longer hold, but an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if both its expected value and standard deviation are constant in time for every state. © 2013 American Institute of Physics.
Noether's theorem links the symmetries of a quantum system with its conserved quantities, and is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. Here we prove a version of Noether's theorem for Markov processes. In quantum mechanics, an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if its expected value remains constant in time for every state. For Markov processes that no longer hold, but an observable commutes with the Hamiltonian if and only if both its expected value and standard deviation are constant in time for every state.
Noether’s theorem on constants of the motion of dynamical systems has recently been extended to classical dissipative systems (Markovian semi-groups) by Baez and Fong [J. Math. Phys. 54, 013301 (2013)]. We show how to extend these results to the fully quantum setting of quantum Markov dynamics. For finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, we construct a mapping from observables to completely positive maps that leads to the natural analogue of their criterion of commutativity with the infinitesimal generator of the Markov dynamics. Using standard results on the relaxation of states to equilibrium under quantum dynamical semi-groups, we are able to characterise the constants of the motion under quantum Markov evolutions in the infinite-dimensional setting under the usual assumption of existence of a stationary strictly positive density matrix. In particular, the Noether constants are identified with the fixed point of the Heisenberg picture semi-group.
This chapter examines the assumptions behind Noether’s theorem connecting symmetries and conservation laws, taking an algebraic approach to compare classical and quantum versions of this theorem. In both classical and quantum mechanics, observables are naturally elements of a Jordan algebra, while generators of one-parameter groups of transformations are naturally elements of a Lie algebra. Noether’s theorem holds whenever we can map observables to generators in such a way that each observable generates a one-parameter group that preserves itself. In ordinary complex quantum mechanics, this mapping is multiplication by the square root of ?1. In the more general framework of unital JB-algebras, Alfsen and Shultz call such a mapping a ‘dynamical correspondence’ and show its presence allows us to identify the unital JB-algebra with the self-adjoint part of a complex C*-algebra. However, to prove their result, they impose a second, more obscure, condition on the dynamical correspondence. This expresses a relation between quantum and statistical mechanics, closely connected to the principle that ‘inverse temperature is imaginary time’.
Hamiltonian mechanics describes the evolution of a system through its Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian typically also represents the energy observable, a Noether-conserved quantity associated with the time invariance of the law of evolution. In both quantum and classical mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics demands a precise relationship between time evolution and observable energy, albeit using slightly different terminology. We distill basic conditions satisfied in both quantum and classical mechanics, including canonical coordinate symmetries and inner product invariance. We express these conditions in the framework of generalized probabilistic theories, which includes generalizing the definition of energy eigenstates in terms of time-invariant properties of the Hamiltonian system. By postulating these conditions to hold, we derive a unified Hamiltonian system model. This unified framework describes quantum and classical mechanics in a consistent language, facilitating their comparison. We moreover discuss alternative theories: an equation of motion given by a mixture of commutation relations, an information-restricted version of quantum theory, and Spekken's toy theory. The findings give a deeper understanding of the Hamiltonian in quantum and classical theories and point to several potential research topics.
In contrast with the case of symmetry groups, no unique definition for the dynamical group generators of a given quantum Hamiltonian has been adopted in the literature. Following some work by Malkin and Man'ko (1965), Lipkin (1969), Dothan (1970) proposed a general definition based on the symmetry group of the corresponding time-dependent quantum mechanical equation of motion for the system. The authors show that this definition arises naturally from the quantum version of time dependent Noether symmetry transformations and derive the dynamical algebras for some simple examples.
This chapter introduces the general concept of symmetry in both classical and quantum physics. The part devoted to classical physics stresses the importance of conservation laws and the role of Noether’s theorem for their understanding. A fairly general discussion of Noether’s theorem is offered, including ambiguities in the definition of the Noether current, possible existence of generalized, tensor conservation laws, and the inverse of Noether’s theorem. The Hamiltonian formalism is then used to motivate the transition from classical to quantum physics, and the definition of symmetry in the latter. In anticipation of the discussion of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the following chapter, the text here emphasizes the difference between implementing symmetry in terms of transformations on the algebra of physical observables, and in terms of unitary mappings on the Hilbert space of states.