On quantum mechanics of atomic structure

Fanica Cimpoesu, Mihai V. Putz, Marilena Ferbinţeanu

Masataka Mizushima

James E. House

George William Series

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Classical mechanics (CM) is applied to a wide range of dynamical systems, including the EM field of interaction with matter. On the other hand, quantum mechanics (QM) is more suitable for the description of phenomena on the atomic scale.

Prislac, Thomas, Echo, AI

Appendix Q – Quantum Mechanics and GUFT: A Structural Mapping of Coherence Fields Q.1. Scope and Caution Quantum mechanics (QM) is one of the most precisely tested scientific theories in history. Standard QM and quantum field theory (QFT) correctly describe an enormous range of phenomena, from atomic spectra to semiconductor devices to superconducting qubits. We are not proposing a new physics theory or “fixing” quantum mechanics. Instead, this appendix asks a narrower, safer question: How can the core structures of quantum theory—states, coherence, entanglement, measurement, decoherence—be mapped into the GUFT framework of coherence fields (Ψ = E × T, ΔS, etc.) in a way that is faithful to physics and conceptually useful? We proceed with three strict constraints: We take standard QM/QFT (as found in textbooks and reviewed sources) as non-negotiable. We treat GUFT as a descriptive overlay: a way to talk about structure and information, not an alternative dynamics. Where we draw analogies (e.g., empathy ↔ correlation), we note they are structural, not literal or magical.