Abstract We construct the first tightly secure hierarchical identity-based encryption (HIBE) scheme based on standard assumptions, which solves an open problem from Blazy, Kiltz, and Pan (CRYPTO 2014). At the core of our constructions is a novel randomization technique that enables us to randomize user secret keys for identities with flexible length. The security reductions of previous HIBEs lose at least a factor of Q, which is the number of user secret key queries. Different to that, the security loss of our schemes is only dependent on the security parameter. Our schemes are adaptively secure based on the Matrix Diffie-Hellman assumption, which is a generalization of standard Diffie-Hellman assumptions such as k-Linear. We have two tightly secure constructions, one with constant ciphertext size, and the other with tighter security at the cost of linear ciphertext size. Among other things, our schemes imply the first tightly secure identity-based signature scheme by a variant of the Naor transformation.
Abstract We construct the first tightly secure hierarchical identity-based encryption (HIBE) scheme based on standard assumptions, which solves an open problem from Blazy, Kiltz, and Pan (CRYPTO 2014). At the core of our constructions is a novel randomization technique that enables us to randomize user secret keys for identities with flexible length. The security reductions of previous HIBEs lose at least a factor of Q, which is the number of user secret key queries. Different to that, the security loss of our schemes is only dependent on the security parameter. Our schemes are adaptively secure based on the Matrix Diffie-Hellman assumption, which is a generalization of standard Diffie-Hellman assumptions such as k-Linear. We have two tightly secure constructions, one with constant ciphertext size, and the other with tighter security at the cost of linear ciphertext size. Among other things, our schemes imply the first tightly secure identity-based signature scheme by a variant of the Naor transformation.
Using lattice basis delegation in a fixed dimension, we propose an efficient lattice-based hierarchical identity based encryption (HIBE) scheme in the standard model whose public key size is only ( dm 2 + mn ) log q bits and whose message-ciphertext expansion factor is only log q , where d is the maximum hierarchical depth and ( n , m , q ) are public parameters. In our construction, a novel public key assignment rule is used to averagely assign one random and public matrix to two identity bits, which implies that d random public matrices are enough to build the proposed HIBE scheme in the standard model, compared with the case in which 2 d such public matrices are needed in the scheme proposed at Crypto 2010 whose public key size is (2 dm 2 + mn + m ) log q . To reduce the message-ciphertext expansion factor of the proposed scheme to log q , the encryption algorithm of this scheme is built based on Gentry’s encryption scheme, by which m 2 bits of plaintext are encrypted into m 2 log q bits of ciphertext by a one time encryption operation. Hence, the presented scheme has some advantages with respect to not only the public key size but also the message-ciphertext expansion factor. Based on the hardness of the learning with errors problem, we demonstrate that the scheme is secure under selective identity and chosen plaintext attacks.
Abstract We construct an identity-based encryption (IBE) scheme that is tightly secure in a very strong sense. Specifically, we consider a setting with many instances of the scheme and many encryptions per instance. In this setting, we reduce the security of our scheme to a variant of a simple assumption used for a similar purpose by Chen and Wee (CRYPTO 2013, Springer, 2013). The security loss of our reduction is O(k) O(k) (where k k is the security parameter). Our scheme is the first IBE scheme to achieve this strong flavor of tightness under a simple assumption. Technically, our scheme is a variation of the IBE scheme by Chen and Wee. However, in order to “lift” their results to the multi-instance, multi-ciphertext case, we need to develop new ideas. In particular, while we build on (and extend) their high-level proof strategy, we deviate significantly in the low-level proof steps.
Recently, Luo et al. proposed an efficient hierarchical identity based encryption (HIBE) scheme with constant size of ciphertexts, and proved its full security under standard assumptions. To construct the scheme, they used the dual system encryption technique of Waters, and devised a method that compresses the tag values of dual system encryption. In this paper, we show that the security proof of Luo et al. is wrong since there exists an algorithm that distinguishes whether it is a simulation or not.
This paper proposes a generic construction of hierarchical identity-based identification (HIBI) protocols secure against impersonation under active and concurrent attacks in the standard model. The proposed construction converts a digital signature scheme existentially unforgeable against chosen message attacks, where the scheme has a protocol for showing possession of a signing key, not a signature. Our construction is based on the so-called certificate-based construction of hierarchical identity-based cryptosystems, and utilizes a variant of the well-known OR-proof technique to ensure the security against impersonation under active and concurrent attacks. We also present several concrete examples of our construction employing the Waters signature (EUROCRYPT 2005), and other signatures. As results, its concurrent security of each instantiation is proved under the computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH) assumption, the RSA assumption, or their variants in the standard model. Chin, Heng, and Goi proposed an HIBI protocol passively and concurrently secure under the CDH and one-more CDH assumption, respectively (FGIT-SecTech 2009). However, its security is proved in the random oracle model.
Receiver selective opening (RSO) security considers the security of encryption schemes under the scenario of a single sender and multiple receivers, where an adversary is allowed to adaptively corrupt some receivers’ secret keys. RSO security has been proven to be more secure than indistinguishability-based security notions. A lot of research has focused on RSO security in terms of public-key encryption and identity-based encryption (IBE); however, hierarchical IBE (HIBE), which is a generalization of IBE, is still lacking in the study, and how to obtain such a construction remains an open problem. To address this gap, we initiate a study of RSO security on HIBE in this work. Precisely, we first formalize the definition of simulation-based RSO against identity-chosen-plaintext/ciphertext attacks in the k-challenge setting (SIM-ID-RSO k -CPA/CCA) for HIBE. We then present generic SIM-ID-RSO k -CCA secure HIBE constructions by introducing the double secret key paradigm. Specifically, we show that a SIM-ID-RSO k -CCA secure HIBE scheme can be obtained from an IND-ID-CPA secure HIBE scheme as well as a one-time signature scheme that satisfies strong unforgeability. Through our general construction, we can derive various concrete schemes based on different hard assumptions (e.g., lattice-based and pairing-based SIM-ID-RSO k -CCA secure HIBE schemes) according to usage requirements.
Identity-based encryption (IBE), and its hierarchical extension (HIBE), are interesting cryptographic primitives that aim at the implicit authentication on the users' public keys by using users' identities directly. During the past several decades, numerous elegant pairing-based (H)IBE schemes were proposed. However, most pairing-related security assumptions suffer from known quantum algorithmic attacks. Therefore, the construction of lattice-based (H)IBE became one of the hot directions in recent years. In the setting of most existing lattice-based (H)IBE schemes, each bit of a user's identity is always associated with a parameter matrix. This always leads to drastic but unfavorable increases in the sizes of the system public parameters. To overcome this issue, we propose a flexible trade-off mechanism between the size of the public parameters and the involved computational cost using the blocking technique. More specifically, we divide an identity into l' segments and associate each segment with a matrix, while increasing the lattice modulo slightly for maintaining the same security level. As a result, for the setting of 160-bit identities, we show that the size of the public parameters can be reduced by almost 89.7% (resp. 93.8%) while increasing the computational cost by merely 5.2% (resp. 12.25%) when l' is a set of 16 (resp. 8). Finally, our IBE scheme is extended to an HIBE scheme, and both of them are proved to achieve the indistinguishability of ciphertexts against adaptively chosen identity and chosen plaintext attack (IND-ID-CPA) in the standard model, assuming that the well-known ring learning with error (RLWE) problem over the involved ideal lattices is intractable, even in the post-quantum era.