Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Implementation of the Variational Quantum Eigensolver algorithm to estimate the ground state energy of the Lipkin model using atomic qubits.

C. Poole, Trent Graham, Minho Kwon, Michael J. Cervia, Peter J. Love, S. N. Coppersmith, A. B. Balantekin, Mark E. Saffman

Published Jun 2, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Variational Simulation of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model on a Neutral Atom Quantum Computer

Ravikumar Chinnarasu, C. Poole, Linipun Phuttitarn +5 more

We simulate the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model using the variational-quantum-eigensolver algorithm on a neutral atom quantum computer. We test the ground-state energy of spin systems with up to 15 spins. Two different encoding schemes are used: an individual spin encoding where each spin is represented by one qubit, and an efficient Gray code encoding scheme that only requires a number of qubits that scales with the logarithm of the number of spins. This more efficient encoding, together with zero-noise extrapolation techniques, is shown to improve the fidelity of the simulated energies with respect to exact solutions.

arXiv:2501.06097•PRX Quantum•Jun 12, 2025•11 citations

Implementation of a Quantum Variational Eigensolver in Superconducting Qubits

Mollie E. Schwartz, Jarrod R. McClean, Chris Macklin +3 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 14, 2016•0 citations

Variational Quantum Eigensolver and Its Applications

Atsushi Matsuo

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

The extended Lipkin model: proposal for implementation in a quantum platform and machine learning analysis of its phase diagram

S. Baid, Sáiz, A., Lucas Lamata +5 more

We investigate the Extended Lipkin Model (ELM), whose phase diagram mirrors that of the Interacting Boson Approximation model (IBA). Unlike the standard Lipkin model, the ELM (as the IBA) features both first- and second-order quantum shape phase transitions depending on the model parameters. Our goal is to implement the ELM on a quantum platform, leveraging Machine Learning techniques to identify its quantum phase transitions and critical lines. To achieve this, we offer: i) ground state energy calculations using a variational quantum eigensolver; ii) a detailed formulation for ELM dynamics within quantum computing, facilitating experimental exploration of the IBA phase diagram; and iii) a phase diagram determination using various Machine Learning methods. We successfully replicate the ELM ground-state energy using the Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Pseudo-Trotter ansatz Variational Quantum Eigensolver (ADAPT-VQE) algorithm across the entire phase space. Our framework ensures ELM implementation on quantum platforms with controlled errors. Lastly, our ML predictions yield a meaningful phase diagram for the model. Keywords: Quantum Platforms Nuclear Models ADAPT-VQE Quantum Shape Phase Transitions Interacting Boson Approximation Extended Lipkin Model Machine Learning

arXiv:2404.15558•Apr 23, 2024•0 citations

Benchmarking Quantum Simulations of the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick Model Using Large Tensor Networks

Maggie Bao, Rushil Dandamudi, Jerimiah Wright +4 more

As quantum computing matures, it is critical to benchmark its real-world problem solving performance against competitive classical methods, such as tensor networks. In this work, we leverage the Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG) algorithm to compute ground state energies of the Lipkin Meshkov Glick (LMG) model as a comparative benchmark against popular noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) algorithms like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) method. By running DMRG on the NERSC Perlmutter supercomputer, we provide one of the largest LMG ground state energy datasets in literature, containing accurate ground state energies for systems up to 1400 particles. We compare these results with VQE and SQD implementations on an IBM Eagle quantum computer for comparison. VQE achieved results within 1 percent error for 6 particles, while exceeding that threshold for all other values while SQD extended that range to 17 particles, suggesting that in a noisy intermediate scale quantum era, subspace-based approaches may strike the best balance between accuracy, circuit depth, and noise resilience.

quant-pharXiv:2607.28570•Jul 31, 2026•0 citations

Qubit-excitation-based adaptive variational quantum eigensolver

Yordan S. Yordanov, Vasileios Armaos, Barnes, Crispin HW +1 more

•Apr 9, 2021•95 citations
We simulate the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model using the variational-quantum-eigensolver algorithm on a neutral atom quantum computer. We test the ground-state energy of spin systems with up to 15 spins. Two different encoding schemes are used: an individual spin encoding where each spin is represented by one qubit, and an efficient Gray code encoding scheme that only requires a number of qubits that scales with the logarithm of the number of spins. This more efficient encoding, together with zero-noise extrapolation techniques, is shown to improve the fidelity of the simulated energies with respect to exact solutions.
We investigate the Extended Lipkin Model (ELM), whose phase diagram mirrors that of the Interacting Boson Approximation model (IBA). Unlike the standard Lipkin model, the ELM (as the IBA) features both first- and second-order quantum shape phase transitions depending on the model parameters. Our goal is to implement the ELM on a quantum platform, leveraging Machine Learning techniques to identify its quantum phase transitions and critical lines. To achieve this, we offer: i) ground state energy calculations using a variational quantum eigensolver; ii) a detailed formulation for ELM dynamics within quantum computing, facilitating experimental exploration of the IBA phase diagram; and iii) a phase diagram determination using various Machine Learning methods. We successfully replicate the ELM ground-state energy using the Adaptive Derivative-Assembled Pseudo-Trotter ansatz Variational Quantum Eigensolver (ADAPT-VQE) algorithm across the entire phase space. Our framework ensures ELM implementation on quantum platforms with controlled errors. Lastly, our ML predictions yield a meaningful phase diagram for the model. Keywords: Quantum Platforms Nuclear Models ADAPT-VQE Quantum Shape Phase Transitions Interacting Boson Approximation Extended Lipkin Model Machine Learning
As quantum computing matures, it is critical to benchmark its real-world problem solving performance against competitive classical methods, such as tensor networks. In this work, we leverage the Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG) algorithm to compute ground state energies of the Lipkin Meshkov Glick (LMG) model as a comparative benchmark against popular noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) algorithms like the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD) method. By running DMRG on the NERSC Perlmutter supercomputer, we provide one of the largest LMG ground state energy datasets in literature, containing accurate ground state energies for systems up to 1400 particles. We compare these results with VQE and SQD implementations on an IBM Eagle quantum computer for comparison. VQE achieved results within 1 percent error for 6 particles, while exceeding that threshold for all other values while SQD extended that range to 17 particles, suggesting that in a noisy intermediate scale quantum era, subspace-based approaches may strike the best balance between accuracy, circuit depth, and noise resilience.