This paper investigates the refraction/reflection laws and the double slit interference pattern for particles. We used boundary conditions that consider the discrete and vibrant structure of the matter with which the particles interact, resulting in their scattering, enabling the use of the Huygens and Huygens-Fresnel principles for particles. We managed to obtain results that generalize Snell’s law, the reflection law and Young’s double slit pattern, for regions very close to the refraction/reflection interface and the slits. The choice made of the scattering used, seems to be the key for a mechanical explanation of light and Young’s double slit pattern, including the case of the particles passing through the slit one at a time, therefore, it challenges the validity of the Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle and might be the missing link that reconnects without hierarchies both Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics.
This paper investigates the refraction/reflection laws and the double slit interference pattern for particles. We used boundary conditions that consider the discrete and vibrant structure of the matter with which the particles interact, resulting in their scattering, enabling the use of the Huygens and Huygens-Fresnel principles for particles. We managed to obtain results that generalize Snell’s law, the reflection law and Young’s double slit pattern, for regions very close to the refraction/reflection interface and the slits. The choice made of the scattering used, seems to be the key for a mechanical explanation of light and Young’s double slit pattern, including the case of the particles passing through the slit one at a time, therefore, it challenges the validity of the Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle and might be the missing link that reconnects without hierarchies both Classical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics.
Abstract The Young's double slit experiment and the electron double slit experiment are generally considered to prove the wave nature of light and electrons. The most obvious sign of the double-slit experiment is that there are bright and dark stripes on the screen. However, people have not carefully studied the causes of the light and dark stripes. Here, we demonstrates that the light and dark fringe in Young's double-slit experiment is not actually the diffraction and interference pattern of light wave, and tries to reveal the real reason for its formation. We have studied the scattering phenomenon of particle flow after passing through the gap, and found that the scattering type and scattering degree of freedom of particle flow are determined by the physical parameters of particles and the gap, and the uniform scattering of particle flow can form a "yes" and "no" discrete distribution pattern on the receiving screen. Based on the "diffraction like" and "interference like" mechanism of particle flow, this paper explains the electron diffraction and interference experiment, as well as the Young's double-slit interference experiment and the diffraction of light through circular holes and plates. This paper negates the wave-particle duality and the de Broglie material wave hypothesis, fundamentally shaking the foundation of modern quantum mechanics, and has great scientific significance.
This paper demonstrates that the light and dark fringe in Young's double-slit experiment is not actually the diffraction and interference pattern of light wave. We investigate the scattering phenomenon after the particle flow passes through the gaps and find that the scattering type and scattering degrees of freedom of the particle flow depend on the physical parameters of the particles and the gaps. When the particle flow undergoes uniform scattering, a uniform "yes" and "no" interspersed discrete distribution pattern will form on the receiving screen. Based on the diffraction-like and interference-like mechanism of particle flow, this paper explains the electron diffraction and interference experiment, as well as the Young's double-slit interference experiment and the diffraction of light through circular holes and plates. This article provides an in-depth discussion on Einstein's concept of wave particle duality and de Broglie's matter wave hypothesis, as well as an analysis of Feynman's experimental idea of electron double slit interference. Our research shows that the matter wave hypothesis is not valid, which has shaken the foundation of modern quantum mechanics and has significant scientific significance. In addition, this study has important application value for the development of technology for detecting and analyzing particles or gaps.
Young’s double slit experiments revived the wave theory of light. The standard interpretation is that the light behaves as waves before and after passing through the double slit, and the superposition of waves produces the interference pattern. Feynman called the double slit experiment the only mystery in quantum mechanics. In this article, we experimentally show the novel universal phenomena: (1) the light is particles, but waves: within macro-distance from a diaphragm, the light rays produce non-interference patterns; while near the screen, the photons produce orthogonal interference patterns; (2) the non-interference patterns evolve to the orthogonal interference patterns gradually in the same experiment; (3) the evolution of the patterns cannot be interpreted by either classic optics or the quantum optics; (4) the non-interference patterns and the orthogonal interference patterns can show on the screen simultaneously; (5) The convex lens stops the further evolution. The experiments: (1) challenge the classical optics and quantum optics; (2) violate both Bohr’s complementarity principle and wave particle duality; (3) provide profound phenomena for developing optics and for studying the nature of light; (4) suggest that a complete theory should be able to consistently interpret all phenomena, including the non-interference pattern, the interference pattern, and the evolution from the non-interference to the interference pattern in the same wave experiment.
Young’s double slit experiments revived the wave theory of light. The standard interpretation is that the light behaves as waves before and after passing through the double slit, and the superposition of waves produces the interference pattern. Feynman called the double slit experiment the only mystery in quantum mechanics. In this article, we experimentally show the novel universal phenomena: (1) within macro-distance from the diaphragm, the light rays behave as photons and produce non-interference patterns; while near the screen, the photons produce interference patterns; (2) The non-interference patterns evolve to the interference patterns gradually in the same classical wave experiment; (3) the light is photons before and after passing through the double slit; (4) The convex lens stops the further evolution. The experiments: (1) challenge the wave theories of the light; (2) violate both Bohr’s complementarity principle and wave particle duality; (3) provide profound phenomena for developing optics and for studying the nature of light; (4) suggest that a complete theory should be able to consistently interpret all phenomena, including the non-interference pattern, the interference pattern, and the evolution from the non-interference to the interference pattern in the wave experiment; (5) show a new mystery that photons, as particles, distribute as waves.
One axiom. One operation. Zero free parameters. The laws of light — Snell’s refraction, reflection at equal angles, diffraction, interference — are taught as separate rules. This paper forces their unifying principle from the fold. Every law of optics is a statement of wave-matching: at a boundary the phases on the two sides must agree, and the wave-matching condition folds to unison (the half-One closing on the One). Refraction is phase-matching across an interface (Snell’s law); reflection is the symmetric match (equal angles); interference and diffraction are the deterministic summation of matched waves — opposed paths cancel (dark), aligned paths survive (bright), the same deterministic discrete account that resolves the double-slit. One principle: phases match, the matching folds to one. Machine-checked; reproduces from one command. A standalone result within the Smithian Fold Theory of Everything (SFTOE). Full corpus, code, and the run-it-yourself VERIFY.md protocol: https://github.com/MettaMazza/Smithian-Fold-Theory
Young’s double-slit experiment was first demonstrated with light and was later extended to electrons and other particles. These experiments share a common geometry: something approaches the slits, passes through them, and produces an interference pattern afterward. However, monochromatic water waves, electrons, and photons are physically different, and their interactions with a real slit need not be the same. Most discussions of the double-slit experiment focus on the interference pattern collected on a screen after the slits. Some descriptions also consider what happens before the slits, including the role of an eraser or observer and the splitting of an electron or photon to interfere with itself. Much less attention is given to what happens while an electron or photon is passing through a real slit. A real slit has thickness and is made of matter. Its surfaces contain atoms, electrons, and nuclei and therefore provide an electromagnetic environment through which an electron or photon passes. An electron or photon enters the slit, travels between its surfaces, and leaves it. This raises a missing question: can an electron or photon interact with this electromagnetic environment while passing through the slit, and can such an interaction affect its motion, particularly its exiting direction? We examine experimental evidence together with geometrical and accumulated-count evidence, including the observed spacing of interference maxima, the nonlinear geometry of constant-path-difference loci, the finite number and different possible counts of interference fringes, and the accumulation of individual detection events. Figures derived from the corresponding experimental and geometrical constructions are used to make these distinctions explicit. These results motivate a global description of Young’s double-slit experiment in three physically connected regions: pre-slit, in-slit, and post-slit. We call this the global trilogy of Young’s double-slit experiment. The global trilogy places the physical slit and its electromagnetic environment explicitly between the familiar pre-slit and post-slit descriptions and provides a framework for investigating the complete process from source, through the slit, to interference and detection.