Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics

Quantum Electronics; proceedings of the third international congress.

P. Grivet, N. Bloembergen

Published Jan 1, 1964• 36 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Advances in Quantum Electronics, Volume 3

Arthur Maitland

Optica Acta International Journal of Optics•Jun 1, 1976•0 citations

Third International Conference on Trends in Quantum Electronics : proceedings : europhysics conference, 29 August-3 September 1988, Bucharest, Romania

Alexander M. Prokhorov, Ioan Ursu

•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Proceedings of Quantum Electronics 8

M. Watt, Clivia Marfa Sotomayor Torres, Rebecca Cheung +3 more

•Jan 1, 1987•1 citation

Quantum Computation and Learning : Third International Workshop, QCL 2002Riga, Latvia, Revised Proceedings

Richard Bonner, Rūsiņš Freivalds

Quantum Computation and Learning : Third International Workshop, QCL 2002Riga, Latvia, Revised Proceedings

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Quantum Interaction

Peter Bruza, Donald Sofge, William F. Lawless +2 more

•Mar 18, 2009•3 citations

The paradigm of complementarity

Sandro Petruccioli

‘The new wave mechanics gave rise to the hope that an account of atomic phenomena might be obtained which would not differ essentially from that afforded by the classical theories of electricity and magnetism. Unfortunately, Bohr's statement in the following communication of the principles underlying the description of atomic phenomena gives little, if any, encouragement in this direction.’ This comment is to be found in the brief note prefaced by the editors of the British journal Nature to Niels Bohr's paper ‘The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory’ in the supplement of 14 April 1928. The article in question is the famous paper which first introduced and defined the concept of ‘complementarity’ and outlined the basic points of what was to become known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. In the paper, Bohr returned to the arguments contained in the paper discussed at the International Congress of Physicists held at Como in September 1927 to mark the centenary of the death of Alessandro Volta and published in the proceedings of the same congress. It was probably his conviction that the new viewpoint adopted in the description of nature fully expressed the theoretical and cognitive content of quantum physics coupled with his enthusiasm at having achieved ‘after many years of struggling in the dark […] the fulfilment of the old hopes’ that induced him to give his work broader and more prestigious circulation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 18, 1993•0 citations
‘The new wave mechanics gave rise to the hope that an account of atomic phenomena might be obtained which would not differ essentially from that afforded by the classical theories of electricity and magnetism. Unfortunately, Bohr's statement in the following communication of the principles underlying the description of atomic phenomena gives little, if any, encouragement in this direction.’ This comment is to be found in the brief note prefaced by the editors of the British journal Nature to Niels Bohr's paper ‘The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory’ in the supplement of 14 April 1928. The article in question is the famous paper which first introduced and defined the concept of ‘complementarity’ and outlined the basic points of what was to become known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. In the paper, Bohr returned to the arguments contained in the paper discussed at the International Congress of Physicists held at Como in September 1927 to mark the centenary of the death of Alessandro Volta and published in the proceedings of the same congress. It was probably his conviction that the new viewpoint adopted in the description of nature fully expressed the theoretical and cognitive content of quantum physics coupled with his enthusiasm at having achieved ‘after many years of struggling in the dark […] the fulfilment of the old hopes’ that induced him to give his work broader and more prestigious circulation.