Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

a Critique of the Indeterminacy Principle.

Frederick E. White

Published Jan 1, 1934• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Psychology and Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy.

Ivan D. London

Psychological Review•May 1, 1945•14 citations

A critique of the disturbance theory of indeterminacy in quantum mechanics

Harvey R. Brown, Michael L. G. Redhead

Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 1981•20 citations

Indeterminism or Instability, does It Matter?

Patrick Suppes

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

On the Galoisian Structure of Heisenberg Indeterminacy Principle

Julien Page, Gabriel Catren

We revisit Heisenberg indeterminacy principle in the light of the Galois-Grothendieck theory for the case of finite abelian Galois extensions. In this restricted framework, the Galois-Grothendieck duality between finite K-algebras split by a Galois extension L and finite Gal(L:K)-sets can be reformulated as a Pontryagin-like duality between two abelian groups. We then define a Galoisian quantum theory in which the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle between conjugate canonical variables can be understood as a form of Galoisian duality: the larger the group of automorphisms H (a subgroup of G) of the states in a G-set O = G/H, the smaller the ``conjugate'' observable algebra that can be consistently valuated on such states. We then argue that this Galois indeterminacy principle can be understood as a particular case of the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle formulated in terms of the notion of entropic indeterminacy. Finally, we argue that states endowed with a group of automorphisms H can be interpreted as squeezed coherent states, i.e. as states that minimize the Heisenberg indeterminacy relations.

•Dec 1, 2013•0 citations

Indeterminism or Instability, Does it Matter?

Patrick Suppes

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•2 citations

Indeterminacy Relations

Daniel M. Greenberger, Klaus Hentschel, Friedel Weinert

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation
We revisit Heisenberg indeterminacy principle in the light of the Galois-Grothendieck theory for the case of finite abelian Galois extensions. In this restricted framework, the Galois-Grothendieck duality between finite K-algebras split by a Galois extension L and finite Gal(L:K)-sets can be reformulated as a Pontryagin-like duality between two abelian groups. We then define a Galoisian quantum theory in which the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle between conjugate canonical variables can be understood as a form of Galoisian duality: the larger the group of automorphisms H (a subgroup of G) of the states in a G-set O = G/H, the smaller the ``conjugate'' observable algebra that can be consistently valuated on such states. We then argue that this Galois indeterminacy principle can be understood as a particular case of the Heisenberg indeterminacy principle formulated in terms of the notion of entropic indeterminacy. Finally, we argue that states endowed with a group of automorphisms H can be interpreted as squeezed coherent states, i.e. as states that minimize the Heisenberg indeterminacy relations.