Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fizika B

Special relativity and causal faster-than-light effects.

Marijan Ribarič, Luka Šušteršič

Published Jan 1, 1994• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

On the Quantum Teleportation and the Faster- Than-Light Problem

Xiaobai Ai

This paper points that the physical essential of quantum teleportation is not clear, “does it relate to the faster-than-light issue?” is an open problem; Considering imaginary nubler“i”,one may find that special relativity is compatible with faster-that-light phenomena if they really exist in nature and causal loops would still remain. Author suggests that it is necessary to design experiments to measure the phase velocity of de Broglie wave and to study the wave-particle duality deeply.

Journal of Yunnan University for Nationalites•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Special relativity from quantum mechanics?

Sibel Başkal, Young S Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Institute of Physics eBooks•May 1, 2021•0 citations

Light faster than light?

Rolf W. Landauer

Nature•Oct 1, 1993•67 citations

Quantum Entanglement - Can Reality Really be this Weird?

Allan Goff

*Special Relativity places severe constraints on any possibility for faster-than-light (FTL) phenomenon. There are four hopes for FTL; warp drive via General Relativity Theory (GRT), wormholes via GRT, tachyons, and quantum mechanics. This talk focuses on why quantum mechanics makes the list. The nonlocal nature of matter demonstrates correlations between distant events that cannot be explained by current concepts of causality. For two classical events to be correlated, either one causes the other, or both possess a common cause in their past light cones. Neither kind of causality can explain the correlations observed in entangled quantum systems. Reality seems to support a third mysterious type of causality, with an essential spacelike nature, but direct spacelike causality should be impossible as it would lead to temporal paradox. The two concepts of classical causality, timelike causes and common cause, are presented along with a review of the EPR experiment showing that something like spacelike causality exists between the distant parts of an entangled quantum system. Bell’s Inequality shows that the EPR correlations cannot be attributed to common causes. Gisin’s EPR-Relativity experiment shows that timelike causes cannot explain the EPR correlations either. The metaphor of Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe is used to show a third type of causality applicable only to quantum situations. This third type of causality is an indirect spacelike cause acting through multiple classical realities, permitting FTL but prohibiting temporal paradox. I. Introduction HIS paper considers the issue of causality in entangled quantum systems. The Background section reviews the two classical notions of causality, EPR type entanglements, and Special Relativity. The Common Cause section reviews Bell’s Inequality theorem and shows how this type of causality cannot explain the correlations seen in entangled systems. The Einsteinian Causality section reviews Gisin’s experiment demonstrating that time-like causality cannot explain these correlations either. Gisin’s conclusion is that quantum systems support a new mysterious 3 rd type of causality. The Quantum Causality section introduces a situation in Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe that exhibits this same kind of causality

AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit (JPC)•Jul 9, 2006•0 citations

Retrocausal Communication Email Process That Violates Causality

Ricardo Valverde Gil

In the theory of special relativity, a particle that has rest mass with subluminal velocity needs infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light. Special relativity does not prohibit the existence of particles that travel faster than light. In arXiv:1303.0614 quantum entanglement was measured at 10,000 times the speed of light or 4 orders of magnitude the speed of light or 2.99 E 12 m/s 2. At the quantum level some believe that retrocausality is forbidden. The purpose of this paper is to show how an email message can go proportionally faster than light to report on an event from the present into the past. The event reported from the present is sent into the past in the Inbox history instantaneously and a copy of the email that is (-) 2.7 hours in the past will also be sent to the Inbox history. Whether or not the event reported from the present that is sent into the past can be changed is not the purpose of this paper. The purpose of this paper is to show how a message from now can report on an event from now and sent into the past.(retrocausal communication)

•Oct 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Relativity?

Maliki Javier Martinez

•Dec 30, 2025•0 citations
*Special Relativity places severe constraints on any possibility for faster-than-light (FTL) phenomenon. There are four hopes for FTL; warp drive via General Relativity Theory (GRT), wormholes via GRT, tachyons, and quantum mechanics. This talk focuses on why quantum mechanics makes the list. The nonlocal nature of matter demonstrates correlations between distant events that cannot be explained by current concepts of causality. For two classical events to be correlated, either one causes the other, or both possess a common cause in their past light cones. Neither kind of causality can explain the correlations observed in entangled quantum systems. Reality seems to support a third mysterious type of causality, with an essential spacelike nature, but direct spacelike causality should be impossible as it would lead to temporal paradox. The two concepts of classical causality, timelike causes and common cause, are presented along with a review of the EPR experiment showing that something like spacelike causality exists between the distant parts of an entangled quantum system. Bell’s Inequality shows that the EPR correlations cannot be attributed to common causes. Gisin’s EPR-Relativity experiment shows that timelike causes cannot explain the EPR correlations either. The metaphor of Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe is used to show a third type of causality applicable only to quantum situations. This third type of causality is an indirect spacelike cause acting through multiple classical realities, permitting FTL but prohibiting temporal paradox. I. Introduction HIS paper considers the issue of causality in entangled quantum systems. The Background section reviews the two classical notions of causality, EPR type entanglements, and Special Relativity. The Common Cause section reviews Bell’s Inequality theorem and shows how this type of causality cannot explain the correlations seen in entangled systems. The Einsteinian Causality section reviews Gisin’s experiment demonstrating that time-like causality cannot explain these correlations either. Gisin’s conclusion is that quantum systems support a new mysterious 3 rd type of causality. The Quantum Causality section introduces a situation in Quantum Tic-Tac-Toe that exhibits this same kind of causality
In the theory of special relativity, a particle that has rest mass with subluminal velocity needs infinite energy to accelerate to the speed of light. Special relativity does not prohibit the existence of particles that travel faster than light. In arXiv:1303.0614 quantum entanglement was measured at 10,000 times the speed of light or 4 orders of magnitude the speed of light or 2.99 E 12 m/s 2. At the quantum level some believe that retrocausality is forbidden. The purpose of this paper is to show how an email message can go proportionally faster than light to report on an event from the present into the past. The event reported from the present is sent into the past in the Inbox history instantaneously and a copy of the email that is (-) 2.7 hours in the past will also be sent to the Inbox history. Whether or not the event reported from the present that is sent into the past can be changed is not the purpose of this paper. The purpose of this paper is to show how a message from now can report on an event from now and sent into the past.(retrocausal communication)