The study of Bose-Einstein condensation has undergone a remarkable expansion during the last twenty years. Observations of this phenomenon have been reported in a number of diverse atomic, optical, and condensed matter systems, facilitated by remarkable experimental advances. The synergy of experimental and theoretical work in this broad research area is unique, leading to the establishment of Bose-Einstein condensation as a universal interdisciplinary area of modern physics. This chapter reviews the broad expansion of Bose-Einstein condensation physics in the past two decades. Introduction The field of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) has undergone an explosive expansion during the past twenty years. Newcomers to this field are now often introduced to this as a universal phenomenon, which nonetheless exhibits diverse (and sometimes strikingly different) manifestations. Despite such differences, the common underlying theme creates a unique identity across many different energy and length scales. The study of BEC as a universal phenomenon was highlighted in a focused conference in 1993, leading to the publication of the well-known “green book” [1], which surveyed the breadth of the field of condensate physics at that time. The success of the conference led to a second meeting in 1995, at which Eric Cornell and Carl Wieman announced the achievement of Bose-Einstein condensation of ultracold 87 Rb atoms in a harmonic trap. That work began an explosion of new research in the field of cold atoms, which has continued to this day, and this very success inevitably led many of those studying cold atoms to pay less attention to other types of condensates. Wolfgang Ketterle gives a historical overview of this exciting period of time in Chapter 3. Recently, various scientific meetings have worked to re-establish the physical connections across different BEC systems, and in 2013 a workshop was held with the focused goal of improving communications across disciplines. This present book is an outgrowth of that meeting. The Situation Before the Revolution Because of the great success of the cold atom BEC and other BEC systems in the past twenty years, it may be hard for young scientists to understand the climate of BEC research in the early 1990s. At that time, there was only one known example of BEC, namely liquid helium-4, and there was a small but vocal minority of scientists who questioned whether BEC was established even in that system.
Following an explosion of research on Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) ignited by demonstration of the effect by 2001 Nobel prize winners Cornell, Wieman and Ketterle, this book surveys the field of BEC studies. Written by experts in the field, it focuses on Bose–Einstein condensation as a universal phenomenon, covering topics such as cold atoms, magnetic and optical condensates in solids, liquid helium and field theory. Summarising general theoretical concepts and the research to date - including novel experimental realisations in previously inaccessible systems and their theoretical interpretation - it is an excellent resource for researchers and students in theoretical and experimental physics who wish to learn of the general themes of BEC in different subfields.
The field of atomic quantum gases has seen rapid and sometimes surprising developments since its beginnings in 1995. In this chapter, I summarize, highlight, and comment on selected topics. Introduction Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) in atomic gases was first observed in 1995, and has changed the face of atomic physics. It is for atoms or matter waves what the laser is for photons: a macroscopically occupied quantum state. It was regarded as an elusive goal until it was discovered in 1995. Although BEC was immediately viewed as a major accomplishment, its impact has far exceeded expectations. Now, twenty years on, there is no question that the field remains exciting. It is impossible to give a review over the developments during those twenty years. Instead, in this chapter, I want to illustrate how often predictions or expectations changed in the pursuit of Bose-Einstein condensation. There were many surprises, and some advances and breakthroughs happened although they were predicted to be impossible. A lesson we can learn from this is that we should always carefully read the fine print when something is proven or assumed impossible, and try to figure out if the assumptions can be circumvented! Since the early history of Bose-Einstein condensation provides several examples for such “impossibility theorems,” I digress into those earlier developments in the first part of this chapter. Early Theoretical Questions Validity of the Prediction of Bose-Einstein Condensation Einstein predicted Bose-Einstein condensation in 1924 in the second of two papers where he generalized Bose's treatment from photons to massive particles [1]. Using statistical arguments introduced by Bose, he found that below a critical temperature, bosonic particles condense in the lowest energy state of the system. In contrast, at very low temperature photons can simply disappear. However, for about a decade, this prediction was not taken at face value. Einstein himself wrote to Ehrenfest, “From a certain temperature on, the molecules ‘condense’ without attractive forces; that is, they accumulate at zero velocity. The theory is pretty, but is there some truth in it?” [2]. In 1927, George E. Uhlenbeck concluded that the predicted BEC phase transition was an artifact of the replacement of the summation over states by an integral and wrote that no “splitting into two phases” would occur [3].
Introduction Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) is one of the most intriguing phenomena in physics. The basic idea goes back to the 1920s, when Einstein made predictions for the behavior of atoms at sufficiently low temperatures and high densities. However, it took seven decades for experimental physicists to realize this phase under the low-density conditions envisioned by Einstein. In the intermediate period there were many experiments in which aspects of BEC played important roles. Therefore, phenomena such as superfluidity and superconductivity were connected to BEC long before its 1995 realization in ultra-cold, low-density atomic vapors. Since BEC can be discussed with very many different backgrounds and applications in mind, the subject can sometimes be overwhelming for interested students. There is a very good reason why a chapter on BEC does not belong in this book. In all the other chapters here, the processes described involve one or at most two atoms, and the interactions that play a role are between the particles that constitute the atom, namely between the nucleus (or nuclei) and their electrons. The interactions are described quantum mechanically by their Hamiltonian that can always be written exactly in non-relativistic terms, and in some cases can even be solved exactly. This makes atoms and molecules a branch of physics where comparisons between theory and experiments become very meaningful since theoretical predictions are often confirmed to very high accuracy. In BEC, it is the interactions among many atoms that are the key for understanding the phenomenon. Although in principle one could write a Hamiltonian for a Bose condensed gas, its large number of particles makes this not very practical. The starting point for the description of a BEC is in the area of many-body physics that belongs to the expertise of condensed-matter physicists. The interactions between ~10 23 electrons in a solid state with a lattice formed by ~10 23 ions resemble the kind of interactions in a BEC much more closely than the simple fewbody interactions in an atom or molecule. Thus all the theoretical models that have been described up to now are not applicable for the contents of this chapter.
The year 2015 marks the 20th anniversary of the achievement of Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) in atomic vapors. Atomic BEC, realized by Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and Wolfgang Ketterle in 1995, commenced an exciting wave to explore quantum few- and many-body physics. Different from solid state matter and helium superfluids, atomic condensates in the gas phase come with drastically lower densities and temperatures, which place the systems in a unique regime where the atomic interactions are simple and precisely known. Furthermore, the condensates are typically weakly interacting: the interaction length scale of few nanometers is much shorter than the interatomic separation of hundreds of nanometers. Thus many early experimental observations can be well understood based on mean-field theory. One celebrated model is the Gross-Pitaevskii equation which provides a precise and quantitative description of weakly interacting Bose condensates [1]. Opportunities to extend cold atom research beyond the weak interaction regime emerged in the early 2000s. Several experimental schemes were developed to prepare atoms in the strong correlation and interaction regimes. One approach is loading atoms into an optical lattice, the interference pattern of laser beams. The lattice potential enhances the interactions of localized atoms and quenches their kinetic energy. A variety of lattice configurations are realized that promise novel quantum phases of ultracold atoms. Another route to strong interaction is based on Feshbach resonance, typically induced by magnetically shifting a molecular state near the scattering continuum of atoms. The resonant coupling between scattering atoms and the molecular state leads to a divergence of the atomic interaction length scale. Exactly on Feshbach resonance, the collision cross section reaches the quantum mechanical limit, and the system becomes strongly hydrodynamic with mean-free path as short as interparticle separation. Fascinating observations in the strong coupling regime soon followed: prominent examples include the superfluid-Mott insulator transition in optical lattices [2], resonantly interacting Fermi gases in the BEC–BCS (Bardeen–Cooper–Schieffer superfluid) crossover [3] and Efimov three-body states [4], and they lead to tremendous research interest into novel quantum states and quantum dynamics. One of the key motivations in these explorations is to uncover new, universal principles that underpin the physics of strongly correlated quantum systems. A well-studied universal behavior in many-body physics manifests in the critical phenomena near a continuous phase transition. Near the critical point, the system develops a diverging correlation length, which suppresses the dependence on other microscopic length scales. The systems are thus scale invariant and can be universally characterized by a few critical exponents. In cold atoms, divergence of correlation lengthes has been observed near the superfluid phase transition [5,6], as well as the superfluid-Mott insulator quantum phase transition in optical lattices. In the lattice experiments, scale invariance can be tested based on the equation of state measurements [7]. These works complement the transport measurements in condensed matter experiments. Has a new class of universal physics been discovered in atomic quantum gases? Yes, it turns out that a special class of strongly interacting quantum gas with ‘intrinsic’ scaling symmetry emerges near a Feshbach resonance [8]. Near the resonance, the scattering length scale diverges a → ∞ [9], unimaginable in classical systems, and the interaction length reaches the maximum value allowed by quantum mechanics as 1/k, called the ‘unitarity limit’ and k is the momentum of the scattering state. A famous example is the strongly interacting Fermi gas in the BEC–BCS crossover regime, where the resonant interactions lead to strong pairing and and universal hydrodynamic behavior. An exciting development in the study of the BEC–BCS crossover focuses on the Fermi gas exactly on Feshbach resonance. Here the system, also called a ‘unitary Fermi gas’, is the most complex and strongly correlated. The resonant interaction, however, implies a special scaling symmetry of the system. To understand the symmetry, we consider a scale transformation: x → Λx that stretches the coordinates of all atoms by a factor of Λ, and thus reduces the atomic density n by a factor of Λ3 in a 3D gas and the kinetic energy Ek ∝ −∇2 by Λ2. One can see that both kinetic energy Ek and interaction energy in the unitarity limit na → n/k are reduced by the same factor Λ2. The system is thus hypothesized to be invariant under the scale transformation [8]. Remarkably, similar scaling symmetry also holds for 2D quantum gas with a constant coupling g = const. [10]. Here stretching the size of the 2D gas by a factor of Λ also reduces both the kinetic Ek and interaction energy gσ by Λ2, where σ is the 2D density. Since the scaling symmetry in these systems comes directly from the form of the interactions, intrinsic scale invariance is robust at all temperatures T and chemical potentials μ and does not rely on the proximity to a phase transition. The scaling symmetry suggests that the only independent variables are the ratios of the length scales or the equivalent energy scales. In a grand canonical ensemble, the independent ratio can be chosen as μ/kBT. This realization greatly simplifies theoretical description as well as the experimental characterization of the system. Theoretically, a new set of universal thermodynamic relations are expected to be insensitive to the microscopic details; experimentally, measurements are expected to collapse into universal functions that only depend on μ/kBT. Measurements on unitary Fermi gas and the 2D Bose gas are consistent with the scaling hypothesis, shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). Remarkable quantitative agreement between measurements and calculations has greatly advanced our understanding of the ‘unitary Fermi gas’ and 2D atomic gas. Ultracold atomic gases which are intrinsically scale invariant: (a) unitary Fermi gas, (b) 2D Bose gas and (c) unitary Bose gas. The scaling symmetry suggests that thermodynamic observables only depend on the ratio of chemical potential and thermal energy |
μ~=μ/kBT|. In (a), thermodynamic pressure of a unitary Fermi gas is compared with calculations and other measurements. Figure courtesy of M. Zwierlein [11]. In (b), the collapse of the density measurement at various temperatures (inset) confirms the scaling symmetry. Figure adopted from [12]. Panel (c) shows the three-body loss spectrum in a 6Li133Cs mixture. The geometric progression of the Efimov resonance positions at B = B1, B2 and B3 toward the Feshbach resonance at B0 results from the discrete scaling symmetry of Efimov physics. Figure adopted from [13]. We may expect the same scaling symmetry for a resonantly interacting Bose gas. Here, however, the scaling symmetry is more subtle because of the presence of three-body physics. Predicted by Vitaly Efimov in the context of nuclear physics [14], an infinite number of three-body bound states exist for resonantly interacting bosons and their energies follow a discrete scaling law, breaking the otherwise continuous scaling symmetry. Identical fermions do not form such three-body states due to Pauli's exclusion principle. Theoretically the three-body bound states are supported by the ‘Efimov potential’ V(R)∝ − 1/R2, where R is the characteristic length scale of the three interacting atoms. While the Efimov potential does not break the continuous scaling symmetry, the presence of discrete three-body states does break the symmetry. An alternative picture based on renormalization group limited cycles [15] also explains the discrete scaling symmetry of the system, a scenario that rarely happens in electronic systems. Experimentally, Efimov states have been observed in cold gases of alkali atoms, as well as in helium-4. The geometric scaling symmetry of Efimov states is reported in a recent experiment, shown in Fig. 1(c). The same discrete scaling symmetry is expected for unitary quantum gas of bosons, which, if confirmed, will establish a unique and fascinating class of strongly interacting quantum systems. While in this article, we focus on atoms in optical lattices and unitary atomic gases as primary examples of universal physics that have been actively investigated, efforts in many new research frontiers have shown promising prospects to uncover new universal physics in the strongly correlated and interacting systems. Non-equilibrium dynamics is one of the hottest directions. Ultracold atoms are particularly suited for the study of quantum dynamics due to their slow evolution time scales of miniseconds to seconds. Dynamics near a quantum phase transition and the thermalization of isolated quantum systems are two research topics with many unanswered questions. Cold atom experiments may provide new universal insights that go beyond current theoretical framework. Another exciting direction is quantum many-body systems with long range or very strong interactions. Examples include trapped ions, and condensates of exotic atoms with huge magnetic dipole moments, polar molecules, as well as those with Rydberg excitations. These systems possess various long range interactions. Novel universal dynamics, for example, propagation of information and entanglement, are predicted to depend solely on the asymptotic form of the interaction and the dimension of the systems. The author thanks Yijun Wang for discussion and careful reading of the article. This work was supported by National Science Foundation (PHY-0747907) and Army Research Office-Multiple University Research Initiative (W911NF-14-1-0003).
The problem of understanding how a coherent, macroscopic Bose- Einstein condensate (BEC) emerges from the cooling of a thermal Bose gas has attracted significant theoretical and experimental interest over several decades. The pioneering achievement of BEC in weakly interacting dilute atomic gases in 1995 was followed by a number of experimental studies examining the growth of the BEC number, as well as the development of its coherence. More recently, there has been interest in connecting such experiments to universal aspects of nonequilibrium phase transitions, in terms of both static and dynamical critical exponents. Here, the spontaneous formation of topological structures such as vortices and solitons in quenched cold-atom experiments has enabled the verification of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism predicting the density of topological defects in continuous phase transitions, first proposed in the context of the evolution of the early universe. This chapter reviews progress in the understanding of BEC formation and discusses open questions and future research directions in the dynamics of phase transitions in quantum gases. Introduction The equilibrium phase diagram of the dilute Bose gas exhibits a continuous phase transition between condensed and noncondensed phases. The order parameter characteristic of the condensed phase vanishes above some critical temperature T c and grows continuously with decreasing temperature below this critical point. However, the dynamical process of condensate formation has proved to be a challenging phenomenon to address both theoretically and experimentally. This formation process is a crucial aspect of Bose systems and of direct relevance to all condensates discussed in this book, despite their evident system-specific properties. Important questions leading to intense discussions in the early literature include the time scale for condensate formation and the role of inhomogeneities and finite-size effects in “closed” systems. These issues are related to the concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking, its causes, and implications for physical systems (see, for example, Chapter 5 by Snoke and Daley). In this chapter, we give an overview of the dynamics of condensate formation and describe the present understanding provided by increasingly well-controlled cold-atom experiments and corresponding theoretical advances over the past twenty years. We focus on the growth of BECs in cooled Bose gases, which, from a theoretical standpoint, requires a suitable nonequilibrium formalism.
At the time of the first workshop in this series in 1993, the only experimentally realized Bose condensate (at least in the simple sense conjectured by Einstein) was liquid 4 He. In the intervening twenty-plus years, much has happened in the world of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC). Probably the most exciting development has been the attainment of condensation in ultracold bosonic atomic gases such as 87 Rb and 23 Na in 1995, followed a few years later by the achievement of degeneracy and eventually Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) pairing in their fermionic counterparts, and the experimental realization of the theoretically long-anticipated “BEC-BCS crossover” by using the magnetic field degree of freedom to tune the system through a Feshbach resonance. One particularly fascinating aspect of the latter has been the realization of a “unitary gas” at the resonance itself – a system which prima facie has no characteristic length scale other than the interparticle separation, and is therefore a major challenge to theorists. Other systems in which BEC has been realized, sometimes transiently, include exciton-polariton complexes in semiconducting microcavities and, at least in a formal sense, the magnons in a magnetic insulator, as well as ultracold gases with a nontrivial and sometimes large “spin” degree of freedom. As compared with our “traditional” Bose condensate, liquid 4 He, these new systems typically have many more (and more rapidly adjustable) control parameters, and have therefore permitted qualitatively new types of experiment. One particularly fascinating development has been the use of optical techniques to generate “synthetic gauge fields” and thus mimic some of the topologically nontrivial systems which have recently been of such intense interest in a condensed-matter setting. At the same time, there remain long-standing issues from helium physics, such as the nature and consequences of “spontaneously broken U(1) symmetry,” the “Kibble-Zurek” mechanism, and more generally the relaxation of strongly nonequilibrium states to equilibrium; in some cases, the new systems have been used to address these more quantitatively than was possible with 4 He. The chapters in this volume address all of these questions and more, and should be of intense interest to both the experimental and the theoretical sides of the BEC community.