Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Routledge eBooks

Basic Principles of Quantum Theory

RW Boyer

Published Aug 18, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Introduces key principles in quantum and quantum field theories for non-specialists: wave-particle duality, complementarity, uncertainty and quantum indeterminism, quantum field theory; ontology vs. epistemology.
DOI
10.4324/9780429321474-3

Related papers

Quantum theory for beginners

Joseph P. McEvoy, Oscar Sergio Zárate, Richard Appignanesi

This work provides an introduction to quantam theory. It covers the key figures, including Planek, Einstein, Heisenberg and Schrodinger and explains the concepts of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, non-locality and Schrodinger's Cat.

Icon Books•Jan 1, 1996•5 citations

The ontological character of quantum concepts in high school physics teaching: Wave-particle duality and the uncertainty principle

Taegyoung Lee

New Physics Sae Mulli•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory: A Mathematical Primer

Jonathan Dimock

Explaining the concepts in a precise mathematical language, this textbook is an ideal introduction for graduate students in mathematics.

•Mar 14, 2011•47 citations

Quantum theory meets Laozi’s philosophy: A thought experiment on chaos, uncertainty, and the generative Tao

Xuhong H. Qian

This article explores the profound epistemological and philosophical intersection between modern quantum theory and ancient Chinese Laozi’s philosophy to navigate the complexities of chaos and uncertainty. By challenging the limitations of classical Newtonian reductionism, which assumes the whole is merely the sum of its parts, the author argues that macroscopic life, cognitive processes, and human consciousness inherently operate under quantum-like laws characterized by wave-particle duality and state superposition. The framework map parallels the foundations of quantum mechanics and Taoist ontology, interpreting the core principles of Yin-Yang complementarity and the mutual creation of being ( yo u) and non-being ( wu ) as classical reflections of quantum dualities and entanglement. Furthermore, the study reinterprets Laozi’s cosmological principle that "Three gives birth to all things," aligning it with modern chaos theory and quantum mechanics, in which a threefold orthogonal superposition serves as the minimal source for resolving complexity and indeterminacy. Through this interdisciplinary dialogue, the article advocates for a paradigm shift from rigid, fragmented academic mindsets to an integrated, wave-like, holistic worldview—unifying Eastern wisdom and Western science—to foster cognitive evolution, innovative educational models, and sustainable human development in the era of artificial intelligence.

TAO.•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

The No-Cloning Life: Uniqueness and Complementarity in Quantum and Quantum-like Theories

Arkady Plotnitsky

This article considers a rarely discussed aspect, the no-cloning principle or postulate, recast as the uniqueness postulate, of the mathematical modeling known as quantum-like, Q-L, modeling (vs. classical-like, C-L, modeling, based in the mathematics adopted from classical physics) and the corresponding Q-L theories beyond physics. The principle is a transfer of the no-cloning principle (arising from the no-cloning theorem) in quantum mechanics (QM) to Q-L theories. My interest in this principle, to be related to several other key features of QM and Q-L theories, such as the irreducible role of observation, complementarity, and probabilistic causality, is connected to a more general question: What are the ontological and epistemological reasons for using Q-L models vs. C-L ones? I shall argue that adopting the uniqueness postulate is justified in Q-L theories and adds an important new motivation for doing so and a new venue for considering this question. In order to properly ground this argument, the article also offers a discussion along similar lines of QM, providing a new angle on Bohr's concept of complementarity via the uniqueness postulate.

Entropy•Apr 24, 2023•4 citations

The Mathematical Language of Quantum Theory: From Uncertainty to Entanglement

Teiko Heinosaari, Mário Ziman

A clear and detailed exposition of the fundamental concepts of quantum theory for graduate students and researchers.

•Feb 13, 2012•143 citations
This article explores the profound epistemological and philosophical intersection between modern quantum theory and ancient Chinese Laozi’s philosophy to navigate the complexities of chaos and uncertainty. By challenging the limitations of classical Newtonian reductionism, which assumes the whole is merely the sum of its parts, the author argues that macroscopic life, cognitive processes, and human consciousness inherently operate under quantum-like laws characterized by wave-particle duality and state superposition. The framework map parallels the foundations of quantum mechanics and Taoist ontology, interpreting the core principles of Yin-Yang complementarity and the mutual creation of being ( yo u) and non-being ( wu ) as classical reflections of quantum dualities and entanglement. Furthermore, the study reinterprets Laozi’s cosmological principle that "Three gives birth to all things," aligning it with modern chaos theory and quantum mechanics, in which a threefold orthogonal superposition serves as the minimal source for resolving complexity and indeterminacy. Through this interdisciplinary dialogue, the article advocates for a paradigm shift from rigid, fragmented academic mindsets to an integrated, wave-like, holistic worldview—unifying Eastern wisdom and Western science—to foster cognitive evolution, innovative educational models, and sustainable human development in the era of artificial intelligence.
This article considers a rarely discussed aspect, the no-cloning principle or postulate, recast as the uniqueness postulate, of the mathematical modeling known as quantum-like, Q-L, modeling (vs. classical-like, C-L, modeling, based in the mathematics adopted from classical physics) and the corresponding Q-L theories beyond physics. The principle is a transfer of the no-cloning principle (arising from the no-cloning theorem) in quantum mechanics (QM) to Q-L theories. My interest in this principle, to be related to several other key features of QM and Q-L theories, such as the irreducible role of observation, complementarity, and probabilistic causality, is connected to a more general question: What are the ontological and epistemological reasons for using Q-L models vs. C-L ones? I shall argue that adopting the uniqueness postulate is justified in Q-L theories and adds an important new motivation for doing so and a new venue for considering this question. In order to properly ground this argument, the article also offers a discussion along similar lines of QM, providing a new angle on Bohr's concept of complementarity via the uniqueness postulate.