Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal for General Philosophy of Science

How to Justify the Symmetrization Postulate in Quantum Mechanics

Tomasz Bigaj

Published Aug 5, 2020• 24 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and correct one argument (known in the literature as the exchange degeneracy argument) in support of the symmetrization postulate in quantum mechanics. I identify the central premise of the argument as a thesis specifying a particular ontic (or epistemic) property of quantum superpositions. The precise form of this thesis depends on some underlying assumptions of a metaphysical character (concerning identifications of objects across possible worlds, or representations de re). I compare the exchange degeneracy argument with alternative formal arguments for the symmetrization postulate, and I discuss the role and meaning of labels in the symmetric/antisymmetric representations of the states of many particles.

DOI
10.1007/s10838-020-09509-3

Related papers

Precision Tests Find No Violation of Bose Statistics

Bertram M. Schwarzschild

The symmetrization postulate of quantum mechanics asserts that the multiparticle wavefunction for any collection of identical particles must be either wholly symmetric or wholly antisymmetric under the exchange of labels between any two particles. In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, this postulate is a somewhat ad hoc assumption tacked onto the theory; wholly symmetric or antisymmetric wave functions are not the only ways of preserving the indistinguishability of identical particles.

Physics Today•Nov 1, 1996•2 citations

Simple proof of the symmetrization postulate in quantum mechanics

Yoel Tikochinsky, Dan Shalitin

With the assumption that n complete single-particle measurements αi uniquely determine the n-identical-particle state ‖α1,α2,...,αn〉, the wavefunction ψ(α1,α2,...,αn) =〈α1,α2,...,αn‖ψ〉 is shown to be either symmetric or antisymmetric under any permutation of its arguments.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1990•1 citation

The Physics Behind Symmetrization

R. E. Kastner

It is often asserted that quantum states for same-type particles must be symmetrized due to ``label redundancy,'' i.e. the assumption that the permutations of labels in direct-product states do not reflect any real physical distinction and thus their permutations constitute an ``exchange degeneracy''. This assumption is directly challenged by the case of scattering of same-type particles such as electrons, which involves two physically distinct scattering channels effectively corresponding to permutation of the labels. I discuss this counterexample with critical attention to an extant portrayal in the literature that omits pertinent physical content. I further note ways in which the assumption that symmetrization must be universally imposed is not supported by actual calculations of particle interactions, nor by seemingly viable particle states based on preparations and outcomes.

quant-pharXiv:2606.22298•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

Informational approach to the quantum symmetrization postulate

Philip Goyal

A remarkable feature of quantum theory is that particles with identical intrinsic properties must be treated as indistinguishable if the theory is to give valid predictions in all cases. In the quantum formalism, indistinguishability is expressed via the symmetrization postulate (Dirac P 1926 Proc. R. Soc. A 112 661 , Heisenberg W 1926 Z. Phys. 38 411 ), which restricts a system of identical particles to the set of symmetric states ('bosons') or the set of antisymmetric states ('fermions'). However, the physical basis and range of validity of the symmetrization postulate has not been established. A well-known topological derivation of the postulate implies that its validity depends on the dimensionality of the space in which the particles move (Laidlaw M and DeWitt C 1971 Phys. Rev. D 3 1375–8 , Leinaas J M and Myrheim J 1977 Il Nuovo Cimento B 37 1–23 ). Here we show that the symmetrization postulate can be derived by strictly adhering to the informational requirement that particles which cannot be experimentally distinguished from one another are not labelled. Our key novel postulate is the operational indistinguishability postulate, which posits that the amplitude of a process involving several indistinguishable particles is determined by the amplitudes of all possible transitions of these particles when treated as distinguishable. The symmetrization postulate follows by requiring consistency with the rest of the quantum formalism. The derivation implies that the symmetrization postulate admits no natural variants. In particular, the possibility that identical particles generically exhibit anyonic behavior in two dimensions is excluded.

arXiv:1309.0478•New Journal of Physics•Jan 20, 2015•9 citations

The Physics Behind Symmetrization

Ruth E. Kastner

It is often asserted that quantum states for same-type particles must be symmetrized due to "label redundancy," i.e., the assumption that the permutations of labels in direct-product states do not reflect any real physical distinction and thus their permutations constitute an "exchange degeneracy". This assumption is directly challenged by the case of scattering of same-type particles such as electrons, which involves two physically distinct scattering channels effectively corresponding to permutation of the labels. I discuss this counterexample with critical attention to an extant portrayal in the literature that omits pertinent physical content. I further note ways in which the assumption that symmetrization must be universally imposed is not supported by actual calculations of particle interactions, nor by seemingly viable particle states based on preparations and outcomes.

Entropy•Jul 8, 2026•1 citation

An elementary proof of symmetrization postulate in quantum mechanics for a system of particles

Diganta Parai, Nikhilesh Maity

According to symmetrization postulate for a system of identical particles, wave function has to be completely symmetric or completely anti-symmetric. In this paper we want to mathematically justify this postulate ignoring the spin part of wave function in three dimension. For a system of N identical particles, if the solution to the governing Schrodinger equation meets these criteria: a) the probability density remains invariant when any two particle positions are exchanged over time, b) the wave function is continuous and has a continuous gradient, and the system exhibits the following characteristics: c) the configuration space, which is 3N dimensional, is connected, and d) the potential term in the Hamiltonian is invariant under the exchange of any two particle positions, then the wave function must be either totally symmetric or totally antisymmetric over time.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09560•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations
Abstract The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and correct one argument (known in the literature as the exchange degeneracy argument) in support of the symmetrization postulate in quantum mechanics. I identify the central premise of the argument as a thesis specifying a particular ontic (or epistemic) property of quantum superpositions. The precise form of this thesis depends on some underlying assumptions of a metaphysical character (concerning identifications of objects across possible worlds, or representations de re). I compare the exchange degeneracy argument with alternative formal arguments for the symmetrization postulate, and I discuss the role and meaning of labels in the symmetric/antisymmetric representations of the states of many particles.
It is often asserted that quantum states for same-type particles must be symmetrized due to ``label redundancy,'' i.e. the assumption that the permutations of labels in direct-product states do not reflect any real physical distinction and thus their permutations constitute an ``exchange degeneracy''. This assumption is directly challenged by the case of scattering of same-type particles such as electrons, which involves two physically distinct scattering channels effectively corresponding to permutation of the labels. I discuss this counterexample with critical attention to an extant portrayal in the literature that omits pertinent physical content. I further note ways in which the assumption that symmetrization must be universally imposed is not supported by actual calculations of particle interactions, nor by seemingly viable particle states based on preparations and outcomes.
A remarkable feature of quantum theory is that particles with identical intrinsic properties must be treated as indistinguishable if the theory is to give valid predictions in all cases. In the quantum formalism, indistinguishability is expressed via the symmetrization postulate (Dirac P 1926 Proc. R. Soc. A 112 661 , Heisenberg W 1926 Z. Phys. 38 411 ), which restricts a system of identical particles to the set of symmetric states ('bosons') or the set of antisymmetric states ('fermions'). However, the physical basis and range of validity of the symmetrization postulate has not been established. A well-known topological derivation of the postulate implies that its validity depends on the dimensionality of the space in which the particles move (Laidlaw M and DeWitt C 1971 Phys. Rev. D 3 1375–8 , Leinaas J M and Myrheim J 1977 Il Nuovo Cimento B 37 1–23 ). Here we show that the symmetrization postulate can be derived by strictly adhering to the informational requirement that particles which cannot be experimentally distinguished from one another are not labelled. Our key novel postulate is the operational indistinguishability postulate, which posits that the amplitude of a process involving several indistinguishable particles is determined by the amplitudes of all possible transitions of these particles when treated as distinguishable. The symmetrization postulate follows by requiring consistency with the rest of the quantum formalism. The derivation implies that the symmetrization postulate admits no natural variants. In particular, the possibility that identical particles generically exhibit anyonic behavior in two dimensions is excluded.
It is often asserted that quantum states for same-type particles must be symmetrized due to "label redundancy," i.e., the assumption that the permutations of labels in direct-product states do not reflect any real physical distinction and thus their permutations constitute an "exchange degeneracy". This assumption is directly challenged by the case of scattering of same-type particles such as electrons, which involves two physically distinct scattering channels effectively corresponding to permutation of the labels. I discuss this counterexample with critical attention to an extant portrayal in the literature that omits pertinent physical content. I further note ways in which the assumption that symmetrization must be universally imposed is not supported by actual calculations of particle interactions, nor by seemingly viable particle states based on preparations and outcomes.
According to symmetrization postulate for a system of identical particles, wave function has to be completely symmetric or completely anti-symmetric. In this paper we want to mathematically justify this postulate ignoring the spin part of wave function in three dimension. For a system of N identical particles, if the solution to the governing Schrodinger equation meets these criteria: a) the probability density remains invariant when any two particle positions are exchanged over time, b) the wave function is continuous and has a continuous gradient, and the system exhibits the following characteristics: c) the configuration space, which is 3N dimensional, is connected, and d) the potential term in the Hamiltonian is invariant under the exchange of any two particle positions, then the wave function must be either totally symmetric or totally antisymmetric over time.