In this paper we show that parallel universes are a reality in our space-time. We used a camera and a specific cognitive technology to create a state of well-being and to interact with nature. It"s the first time that we observe the reality of our space-time using a mixture of quantum physics, relativity and cognitive science. Physicists look for a theory to understand our universe, a theory that would blend quantum mechanics with relativity, but they forget an important thing, which is consciousness. Today several ideas exist. The approaches are theoretical and the experiments difficult to carry out. This experimental work proposes to blend physics and cognitive science, thus showing the existence of parallel universe and the existence of light entities or new phenomena in our space-time. Therefore, this work indicates that consciousness plays an important part in the understanding of our universe and of time.
In this paper we show that parallel universes are a reality in our space-time. We used a camera and a specific cognitive technology to create a state of well-being and to interact with nature. It"s the first time that we observe the reality of our space-time using a mixture of quantum physics, relativity and cognitive science. Physicists look for a theory to understand our universe, a theory that would blend quantum mechanics with relativity, but they forget an important thing, which is consciousness. Today several ideas exist. The approaches are theoretical and the experiments difficult to carry out. This experimental work proposes to blend physics and cognitive science, thus showing the existence of parallel universe and the existence of light entities or new phenomena in our space-time. Therefore, this work indicates that consciousness plays an important part in the understanding of our universe and of time.
Western philosophy and science have a strongly dualistic tradition regarding the mental and physical aspects of reality, which makes it difficult to understand their possible causal relations. In recent debates in cognitive neuroscience it has been common to claim on the basis of neural experiments that conscious experiences are causally inefficacious. At the same time there is much evidence that consciousness does play an important role in guiding behavior. The author explores whether a new way of understanding the causal role of mental states and consciousness could be provided by the ontological interpretation of the quantum theory (Bohm and Hiley, Phys. Rep. 144:323–348, 1987; Bohm and Hiley, The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Routledge: London, 1993). This interpretation radically changes our notion of matter by suggesting that a new type of active information plays a causal role at the quantum level of reality. The author thus considers to what extent the alleged causal powers of consciousness involve information, and then moves on to consider whether information in (conscious) mental states can be connected to the information at the level of quantum physics. In this way he sketches how quantum theory might help to throw light upon one of the grand challenges facing the social sciences and the humanities, namely the question of whether consciousness plays any genuine causal role in the physical world.
Starting from a fundamental assumption whose validity we will establish through reliable scientific data, the Super-Entangled Universe model we ultimately present demonstrates that, similar to quantum entanglement, macroscopic entities are entangled with one another independently of both distance and time. This model reveals that the phenomenon of entanglement, which is absent in classical mechanics but intrinsic to standard quantum mechanics, likewise exists at the cosmic scale. The proposed framework offers a unified approach to understanding both cosmic and quantum phenomena, addressing existing gaps and thereby aiming to go beyond them, that is, to demonstrate the existence of what lies beyond the universe. Our perspective shows that the universe may exist not externally, but solely intrinsically through conscious observation. Such a model provides a novel, complementary, yet unconventional perspective on the nature of the universe. This new outlook, in itself, can also offer simple and natural solutions to the eleven most fundamental and mysterious questions that theoretical physics still faces today.
Starting from a fundamental assumption whose validity we will establish through reliable scientific data, the Super-Entangled Universe model we ultimately present demonstrates that, similar to quantum entanglement, macroscopic entities are entangled with one another independently of both distance and time. This model reveals that the phenomenon of entanglement, which is absent in classical mechanics but intrinsic to standard quantum mechanics, likewise exists at the cosmic scale. The proposed framework offers a unified approach to understanding both cosmic and quantum phenomena, addressing existing gaps and thereby aiming to go beyond them, that is, to demonstrate the existence of what lies beyond the universe. Our perspective shows that the universe may exist not externally, but solely intrinsically through conscious observation. Such a model provides a novel, complementary, yet unconventional perspective on the nature of the universe. This new outlook, in itself, can also offer simple and natural solutions to the eleven most fundamental and mysterious questions that theoretical physics still faces today.
Starting from a fundamental assumption whose validity we will establish through reliable scientific data, the Super-Entangled Universe model we ultimately present demonstrates that, similar to quantum entanglement, macroscopic entities are entangled with one another independently of both distance and time. This model reveals that the phenomenon of entanglement, which is absent in classical mechanics but intrinsic to standard quantum mechanics, likewise exists at the cosmic scale. The proposed framework offers a unified approach to understanding both cosmic and quantum phenomena, addressing existing gaps and thereby aiming to go beyond them, that is, to demonstrate the existence of what lies beyond the universe. Our perspective shows that the universe may exist not externally, but solely intrinsically through conscious observation. Such a model provides a novel, complementary, yet unconventional perspective on the nature of the universe. This new outlook, in itself, can also offer simple and natural solutions to the thirteen most fundamental and mysterious questions that theoretical physics still faces today.
Quantum consciousness concerns both the possible role that quantum mechanics has for understanding consciousness as well as the role that consciousness has for interpreting quantum physics. Quantum brain theories hypothesize that quantum physical processes occur within and between the neurons of the brain and have important effects on cognition as well as consciousness. Quantum cognition is a growing new field in cognitive science concerned with the application of the mathematical principles of quantum theory to human judgment and decision-making behaviour. What do all these theories have to do with each other? Quantum theories of consciousness have more to say about quantum physics than cognitive psychology and conscious experiences. Quantum brain theories have not been sufficiently ‘scaled up’ to provide clear implications for how quantum physical processes generate more complex cognition. Quantum cognition theories have avoided addressing fundamental issues about consciousness and have remained agnostic with respect to the quantum brain hypothesis. This article will address the problem of connecting these ideas together by connecting quantum cognition to the other two topics.
Natural science is founded on materialism. We treat the independent relationship between inner experience and outer physical entities as an axiom. This cognitive paradigm has successfully explained many natural phenomena; however, certain phenomena, such as those in quantum mechanics and psychological experiments, challenge this view, suggesting the inseparability of the inner and outer. Yet, the inner and outer appear to be distinct categories of existence, and experimental models demonstrating their transformative relationship remain lacking. This has led to issues like the explanatory gap. We propose that adopting holism is a potential solution to reconcile this dilemma: the inner experience can be objectively described and possesses objective causal efficacy. According to holism, objective reality and a causal relationship are not absolute but inseparable from the cognitive perspective. Materialism's view that the inner and outer exist as independent relations is an underlying assumption based on the third-person perspective rather than an axiom. From the third-person perspective, the physical properties of things are described, and we establish a causal relationship confined to spacetime, where things interact through physical medium. This cognitive perspective excels at describing the laws of motion governing simple systems but simultaneously introduces limitations, such as the explanatory gap. From the first-person perspective, the holistic attributes of things can also be objectively described. "Inner" and "outer" can be seen as two different states of experience, and things here interact holistically without a physical medium, forming causality unrestricted by spacetime. This perspective excels at revealing the laws governing complex systems/phenomena and can reconcile the explanatory gap. These two cognitive perspectives, although superficially opposed, are functionally complementary. Therefore, the generalized complementarity principle based on holism provides a falsifiable research approach for the "subjective" interpretation of quantum theory, potentially reconciling the contradictions between quantum theory and relativity. Holism also offers a solution for reconciling divergent viewpoints among consciousness theories, enabling phenomena related to consciousness across multiple disciplines to be explained within a unified theoretical framework. To test these hypotheses, we propose an experimental model to demonstrate that, similar to the role of force that we revealed in the third-person perspective, holistic interaction without a physical medium from the first-person perspective is also an objective way of interaction between things. Under holistic interaction, the inner experience, as a holistic attributes of things, can also produce observable and objective causal efficacy.