Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

SPhD

On the solution of the inverse problem for confining potentials in quantum mechanics

V. B. Gostev, В. С. Минеев, A. R. Frenkin

Published Feb 1, 1982• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

The inverse problem of quantum mechanics for a linear potential

V. B. Gostev, В. С. Минеев, A. R. Frenkin

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Jul 1, 1983•4 citations

Inverse-square potential and the quantum vortex

Hua Wu, Donald W. L. Sprung

The vortex structure of the steady-state probability flow for a general one-particle system in quantum mechanics is introduced and its relationship to the inverse-square potential is discussed. The relationship is made clear by classifying the corresponding solutions of the related classical inverse-square-potential problem.

Physical Review A•Jun 1, 1994•38 citations

Uniform-density Bose-Einstein condensates of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation found by solving the inverse problem for the confining potential

Fred Cooper, Avinash Khare, John F. Dawson +2 more

In this work, we study the existence and stability of constant density (flat-top) solutions to the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) in confining potentials. These are constructed by using the "inverse problem" approach which corresponds to the identification of confining potentials that make flat-top waveforms exact solutions to the GPE. In the one-dimensional case, the exact solution is the sum of stationary kink and antikink solutions, and in the overlapping region, the density is constant. In higher spatial dimensions, the exact solutions are generalizations of this wave function. In the absence of self-interactions, the confining potential is similar to a smoothed-out finite square well with minima also at the edges. When self-interactions are added, terms proportional to ±gψ^{*}ψ and ±gM with M representing the mass or number of particles in Bose-Einstein condensates get added to the confining potential and total energy, respectively. In the realm of stability analysis, we find (linearly) stable solutions in the case with repulsive self-interactions which also are stable to self-similar deformations. For attractive interactions, however, the minima at the edges of the potential get deeper and a barrier in the center forms as we increase the norm. This leads to instabilities at a critical value of M. Comparing the stability criteria from Derrick's theorem with Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) analysis stability results, we find that both predict stability for repulsive self-interactions and instability at a critical mass M for attractive interactions. However, the numerical analysis gives a much lower critical mass. This is due to the emergence of symmetry-breaking instabilities that were detected by the BdG analysis and violate the symmetry x→-x assumed by Derrick's theorem.

Physical review. E•Jun 5, 2023•5 citations

The Inverse Problem in Quantum Mechanics

D. I. Blokhint︠s︡ev

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1968•0 citations

On the quantum inverse scattering problem

Jean Michel Maillet, V. Terras

arXiv:hep-th/9911030•Nuclear Physics B•Jun 1, 2000•215 citations

The application of the “inverse problem” method for constructing confining potentials that make N-soliton waveforms exact solutions in the Gross–Pitaevskii equation

Fred Cooper, Avinash Khare, John F. Dawson +2 more

In this work, we discuss an application of the "inverse problem" method to find the external trapping potential, which has particular N trapped soliton-like solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) also known as the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE). This inverse method assumes particular forms for the trapped soliton wave function, which then determines the (unique) external (confining) potential. The latter renders these assumed waveforms exact solutions of the GPE (NLSE) for both attractive (g<0) and repulsive (g>0) self-interactions. For both signs of g, we discuss the stability with respect to self-similar deformations and translations. For g<0, a critical mass Mc or equivalently the number of particles for instabilities to arise can often be found analytically. On the other hand, for the case with g>0 corresponding to repulsive self-interactions which is often discussed in the atomic physics realm of Bose-Einstein condensates, the bound solutions are found to be always stable. For g<0, we also determine the critical mass numerically by using linear stability or Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis, and compare these results with our analytic estimates. Various analytic forms for the trapped N-soliton solutions in one, two, and three spatial dimensions are discussed, including sums of Gaussians or higher-order eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian.

Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science•Apr 1, 2024•2 citations
In this work, we study the existence and stability of constant density (flat-top) solutions to the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) in confining potentials. These are constructed by using the "inverse problem" approach which corresponds to the identification of confining potentials that make flat-top waveforms exact solutions to the GPE. In the one-dimensional case, the exact solution is the sum of stationary kink and antikink solutions, and in the overlapping region, the density is constant. In higher spatial dimensions, the exact solutions are generalizations of this wave function. In the absence of self-interactions, the confining potential is similar to a smoothed-out finite square well with minima also at the edges. When self-interactions are added, terms proportional to ±gψ^{*}ψ and ±gM with M representing the mass or number of particles in Bose-Einstein condensates get added to the confining potential and total energy, respectively. In the realm of stability analysis, we find (linearly) stable solutions in the case with repulsive self-interactions which also are stable to self-similar deformations. For attractive interactions, however, the minima at the edges of the potential get deeper and a barrier in the center forms as we increase the norm. This leads to instabilities at a critical value of M. Comparing the stability criteria from Derrick's theorem with Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) analysis stability results, we find that both predict stability for repulsive self-interactions and instability at a critical mass M for attractive interactions. However, the numerical analysis gives a much lower critical mass. This is due to the emergence of symmetry-breaking instabilities that were detected by the BdG analysis and violate the symmetry x→-x assumed by Derrick's theorem.
In this work, we discuss an application of the "inverse problem" method to find the external trapping potential, which has particular N trapped soliton-like solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation (GPE) also known as the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE). This inverse method assumes particular forms for the trapped soliton wave function, which then determines the (unique) external (confining) potential. The latter renders these assumed waveforms exact solutions of the GPE (NLSE) for both attractive (g<0) and repulsive (g>0) self-interactions. For both signs of g, we discuss the stability with respect to self-similar deformations and translations. For g<0, a critical mass Mc or equivalently the number of particles for instabilities to arise can often be found analytically. On the other hand, for the case with g>0 corresponding to repulsive self-interactions which is often discussed in the atomic physics realm of Bose-Einstein condensates, the bound solutions are found to be always stable. For g<0, we also determine the critical mass numerically by using linear stability or Bogoliubov-de Gennes analysis, and compare these results with our analytic estimates. Various analytic forms for the trapped N-soliton solutions in one, two, and three spatial dimensions are discussed, including sums of Gaussians or higher-order eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian.