Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

TePhL

Logic elements for quantum-mechanical computers

V. V. Antsiferov, Gennady I. Smirnov, G. G. Telegin

Published Jul 1, 1995• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Single-electron-based reversible logic elements for a quantum-mechanical computer

S. P. Vyatchanin, Е. А. Зубова

Optics and Spectroscopy•May 1, 1993•1 citation

Quantum Logic for Quantum Computers

Mladen Pavičić

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 2000•0 citations

Basic Elements for Quantum Computation

Tzvetan S. Metodi, Frederic T. Chong

Synthesis lectures on computer architecture•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Design-space exploration of fault-tolerant building blocks for large-scale quantum computing

Tzvetan S. Metodi, Andrew W. Cross, Darshan Thaker +2 more

In this paper, we present a design methodology for quantifying the role each building component of a logical fault-tolerant building block for quantum computers plays in the performance of the logical block. A logical building block is the set of operations necessary to execute a fault-tolerant circuit structure in quantum programs, such as the network of operations implementing a logical quantum bit. By analyzing the interaction between the algorithmic structure of a building block and the number of lower-level elements where faults are likely to occur, we can quantify the sensitivity of logical building blocks to two things: (1) to changes in the failure rates of the lower level elements comprising a proposed microarchitecture model, which are defined as logic gates, memory mechanisms, and data communication mechanisms; and (2) to transformation of the program structure for each building block through compilation techniques. We further show how this information can be used to develop optimized building blocks by inserting the gathered design constraints in our compilation mechanisms.

IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures (NANOARCH)•Oct 1, 2007•0 citations

Quantum Computation and Logic

María Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Roberto Leporini +1 more

Trends in logic•Jan 1, 2018•16 citations

On the existence of truly autonomic computing systems and the link with quantum computing

R. Srinivasan, H. P. Raghunandan

A theoretical model of truly autonomic computing systems (ACS), with infinitely many constraints, is proposed. An argument similar to Turing's for the unsolvability of the halting problem, which is permitted in classical logic, shows that such systems cannot exist. Turing's argument fails in the recently proposed non-Aristotelian finitary logic (NAFL), which permits the existence of ACS. NAFL also justifies quantum superposition and entanglement, which are essential ingredients of quantum algorithms, and resolves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox in favour of quantum mechanics and non-locality. NAFL requires that the autonomic manager (AM) must be conceptually and architecturally distinct from the managed element, in order for the ACS to exist as a non-self-referential entity. Such a scenario is possible if the AM uses quantum algorithms and is protected from all problems by (unbreakable) quantum encryption, while the managed element remains classical. NAFL supports such a link between autonomic and quantum computing, with the AM existing as a metamathematical entity. NAFL also allows quantum algorithms to access truly random elements and thereby supports non-standard models of quantum (hyper-) computation that permit infinite parallelism.

arXiv:cs/0411094•Nov 25, 2004•3 citations
In this paper, we present a design methodology for quantifying the role each building component of a logical fault-tolerant building block for quantum computers plays in the performance of the logical block. A logical building block is the set of operations necessary to execute a fault-tolerant circuit structure in quantum programs, such as the network of operations implementing a logical quantum bit. By analyzing the interaction between the algorithmic structure of a building block and the number of lower-level elements where faults are likely to occur, we can quantify the sensitivity of logical building blocks to two things: (1) to changes in the failure rates of the lower level elements comprising a proposed microarchitecture model, which are defined as logic gates, memory mechanisms, and data communication mechanisms; and (2) to transformation of the program structure for each building block through compilation techniques. We further show how this information can be used to develop optimized building blocks by inserting the gathered design constraints in our compilation mechanisms.
A theoretical model of truly autonomic computing systems (ACS), with infinitely many constraints, is proposed. An argument similar to Turing's for the unsolvability of the halting problem, which is permitted in classical logic, shows that such systems cannot exist. Turing's argument fails in the recently proposed non-Aristotelian finitary logic (NAFL), which permits the existence of ACS. NAFL also justifies quantum superposition and entanglement, which are essential ingredients of quantum algorithms, and resolves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox in favour of quantum mechanics and non-locality. NAFL requires that the autonomic manager (AM) must be conceptually and architecturally distinct from the managed element, in order for the ACS to exist as a non-self-referential entity. Such a scenario is possible if the AM uses quantum algorithms and is protected from all problems by (unbreakable) quantum encryption, while the managed element remains classical. NAFL supports such a link between autonomic and quantum computing, with the AM existing as a metamathematical entity. NAFL also allows quantum algorithms to access truly random elements and thereby supports non-standard models of quantum (hyper-) computation that permit infinite parallelism.