Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Classical Mechanical Projections of QM

Pavel Bóna

Published Jan 1, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-45070-0_3

Related papers

Examples of Classical Mechanical Projections

Pavel Bóna

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Quantum mechanics as an approximation of classical statistical mechanics

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We show that the probabilistic formalism of QM can be obtained as a special projection of classical statistical mechanics for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Such systems can be interpreted as classical fields. Thus in our approach QM is a projection of (prequantum) classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This projection is based on the Taylor expansion of classical physical variables – maps f: Ω → R, where Ω is the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The space of classical statistical states consists of Gaussian measures on Ω having zero mean value and negligibly small dispersion. On one hand, the creation of such a prequantum model strongly supports attempts (first of all by Schrödinger and Einstein) to create purely field model of QM. On the other hand, it gives the possibility to go beyond QM. The main experimental prediction is that averages calculated in the mathematical formalism of QM (von Neumann’s trace formula) are only approximative averages. If predictions of PCSFT are correct then it would be possible to find deviations of experimental averages from quantum ones. 1

•Jun 3, 2005•0 citations

The Quantum Mechanics of Micromechanics

Science•Mar 9, 2001•0 citations

Bell Inequality Violations Under Reasonable and Under Weak Hypotheses

Edson de Faria, Charles P. Tresser

Given a sequence of pairs (${p}_{i}$, ${\overline{p}}_{i}$) of spin-$1/2$ particles in the singlet state, assume that Alice measures the normalized projections ${a}_{i}$ of the spins of the ${p}_{i}$'s along vector $\mathbit{a}$ while Bob measures the normalized projections ${b}_{i}$ of the spins of the ${\overline{p}}_{i}$'s along vector $\mathbit{b}$. Then quantum mechanics (QM) lets one evaluate the correlation $⟨a,b⟩$ as $\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{cos}({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{a}}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{b}})$ where ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{v}}$ is the angle between the vector $\mathbit{v}$ and a reference vector chosen once and for all and in a fixed plane. Assuming classical microscopic realism (CMR) there exist also normalized projection pairs (${a}_{i}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, ${b}_{i}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) of the spins of the pairs (${p}_{i}$, ${\overline{p}}_{i}$) along (${\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, ${\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) so that $⟨{a}^{\ensuremath{'}},{b}^{\ensuremath{'}}⟩=\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{cos}({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{{\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{{\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}}})$. Since all projections are in ${\ensuremath{-}1,1}$, $|⟨c,d⟩+⟨c,e⟩|+|⟨f,d⟩\ensuremath{-}⟨f,e⟩|\ensuremath{\le}2$ for $c$, $d$, $e$, and $f$ in ${a,b,{a}^{\ensuremath{'}},{b}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$. Assuming locality (the impossibility of any effect of an event on another event when said events are spatially separated) beside QM and CMR, Bell's theory lets one deduce various violations of this inequality at some choices of quadruplets $Q\ensuremath{\equiv}(\mathbit{a},\mathbit{b},{\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}},{\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$. Our main result is the existence of such $Q$'s where at least one of the above inequalities is violated if one only assumes QM, CMR, and some very mild further hypotheses that only concern the behavior of correlations that appear in these inequalities near special $Q$'s.

arXiv:1212.4344•Physical Review Letters•Jun 28, 2013•2 citations

Quantum mechanics as an asymptotic projection of statistical mechanics of classical fields: derivation of Schrödinger's, Heisenberg's and von Neumann's equations

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We show that QM can be represented as a natural projection of a classical statistical model on the phase space $Ω= H\times H,$ where $H$ is the real Hilbert space. Statistical states are given by Gaussian measures on $Ω$ having zero mean value and dispersion of very small magnitude $α$ (which is considered as a small parameter of the model). Such statistical states can be interpreted as fluctuations of the background field, cf. with SED and Nelson's mechanics. Physical variables (e.g., energy) are given by maps $f: Ω\to {\bf R}$ (functions of classical fields). The conventional quantum representation of our prequantum classical statistical model is constructed on the basis of the Taylor expansion (up to the terms of the second order at the vacuum field point $ψ\_{\rm{vacuum}}\equiv 0)$ of variables $f: Ω\to {\bf R}$ with respect to the small parameter $\sqrtα.$ The complex structure of QM is induced by the symplectic structure on the infinite-dimensional phase space $Ω.$ A Gaussian measure (statistical state) is represented in QM by its covariation operator. Equations of Schrödinger, Heisenberg and von Neumann are images of Hamiltonian dynamics on $Ω.$ The main experimental prediction of our prequantum model is that experimental statistical averages can deviate from ones given by QM.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511074•Nov 8, 2005•1 citation

Beyond Classical Mechanics

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 27, 2021•0 citations
We show that the probabilistic formalism of QM can be obtained as a special projection of classical statistical mechanics for systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom. Such systems can be interpreted as classical fields. Thus in our approach QM is a projection of (prequantum) classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). This projection is based on the Taylor expansion of classical physical variables – maps f: Ω → R, where Ω is the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. The space of classical statistical states consists of Gaussian measures on Ω having zero mean value and negligibly small dispersion. On one hand, the creation of such a prequantum model strongly supports attempts (first of all by Schrödinger and Einstein) to create purely field model of QM. On the other hand, it gives the possibility to go beyond QM. The main experimental prediction is that averages calculated in the mathematical formalism of QM (von Neumann’s trace formula) are only approximative averages. If predictions of PCSFT are correct then it would be possible to find deviations of experimental averages from quantum ones. 1
Given a sequence of pairs (pi{p}_{i}pi​, p‾i{\overline{p}}_{i}p​i​) of spin-1/21/21/2 particles in the singlet state, assume that Alice measures the normalized projections ai{a}_{i}ai​ of the spins of the pi{p}_{i}pi​'s along vector $\mathbit{a}$ while Bob measures the normalized projections bi{b}_{i}bi​ of the spins of the p‾i{\overline{p}}_{i}p​i​'s along vector $\mathbit{b}$. Then quantum mechanics (QM) lets one evaluate the correlation ⟨a,b⟩⟨a,b⟩⟨a,b⟩ as $\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{cos}({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{a}}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{b}})$ where ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathbit{v}}$ is the angle between the vector $\mathbit{v}$ and a reference vector chosen once and for all and in a fixed plane. Assuming classical microscopic realism (CMR) there exist also normalized projection pairs (${a}_{i}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, ${b}_{i}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) of the spins of the pairs (pi{p}_{i}pi​, p‾i{\overline{p}}_{i}p​i​) along (${\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, ${\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) so that $⟨{a}^{\ensuremath{'}},{b}^{\ensuremath{'}}⟩=\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{cos}({\ensuremath{\theta}}_{{\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\theta}}_{{\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}}})$. Since all projections are in ${\ensuremath{-}1,1}$, $|⟨c,d⟩+⟨c,e⟩|+|⟨f,d⟩\ensuremath{-}⟨f,e⟩|\ensuremath{\le}2$ for ccc, ddd, eee, and fff in ${a,b,{a}^{\ensuremath{'}},{b}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$. Assuming locality (the impossibility of any effect of an event on another event when said events are spatially separated) beside QM and CMR, Bell's theory lets one deduce various violations of this inequality at some choices of quadruplets $Q\ensuremath{\equiv}(\mathbit{a},\mathbit{b},{\mathbit{a}}^{\ensuremath{'}},{\mathbit{b}}^{\ensuremath{'}})$. Our main result is the existence of such QQQ's where at least one of the above inequalities is violated if one only assumes QM, CMR, and some very mild further hypotheses that only concern the behavior of correlations that appear in these inequalities near special QQQ's.
We show that QM can be represented as a natural projection of a classical statistical model on the phase space Ω=H×H,Ω= H\times H,Ω=H×H, where HHH is the real Hilbert space. Statistical states are given by Gaussian measures on ΩΩΩ having zero mean value and dispersion of very small magnitude ααα (which is considered as a small parameter of the model). Such statistical states can be interpreted as fluctuations of the background field, cf. with SED and Nelson's mechanics. Physical variables (e.g., energy) are given by maps f:Ω→Rf: Ω\to {\bf R}f:Ω→R (functions of classical fields). The conventional quantum representation of our prequantum classical statistical model is constructed on the basis of the Taylor expansion (up to the terms of the second order at the vacuum field point ψ_vacuum≡0)ψ\_{\rm{vacuum}}\equiv 0)ψ_vacuum≡0) of variables f:Ω→Rf: Ω\to {\bf R}f:Ω→R with respect to the small parameter α.\sqrtα.α​. The complex structure of QM is induced by the symplectic structure on the infinite-dimensional phase space Ω.Ω.Ω. A Gaussian measure (statistical state) is represented in QM by its covariation operator. Equations of Schrödinger, Heisenberg and von Neumann are images of Hamiltonian dynamics on Ω.Ω.Ω. The main experimental prediction of our prequantum model is that experimental statistical averages can deviate from ones given by QM.