It is shown that for any given quantum system evolving unitarily with the Hamiltonian, $\hat{H} = \hat{\bf p}^2/(2m) + U({\bf q})$ , [bold letters denote $D$ -dimensional ( $D \geqslant 3$ ) vectors] and with a sufficiently smooth potential $U({\bf q})$ , there exits a classical ensemble with the Hamilton function, $\mathrsfs{H} ({\bf p}, {\bf q}) = {\bf p}^2/(2m) + U^{(\infty)} ({\bf q})$, where the potential $U^{(\infty)}({\bf q})$ coincides with $U({\bf q})$ for almost all ${\bf q}$ (i.e., $U^{(\infty)}$ can be different from $U$ only on a measure zero set), such that the square modulus of the wave function in the coordinate (momentum) representation approximately equals the coordinate (momentum) distribution of the classical ensemble within an arbitrary given accuracy. Furthermore, the trajectories of this classical ensemble, generally speaking, need not coincide with the trajectories obtained from de Broglie--Bohmian mechanics. Consequences of this result are discussed.It is shown that for any given quantum system evolving unitarily with the Hamiltonian, $\hat{H} = \hat{\bf p}^2/(2m) + U({\bf q})$, [bold letters denote $D$-dimensional ($D \geqslant 3$) vectors] and with a sufficiently smooth potential $U({\bf q})$, there exits a classical ensemble with the Hamilton function, $\mathrsfs{H} ({\bf p}, {\bf q}) = {\bf p}^2/(2m) + U^{(\infty)} ({\bf q})$, where the potential $U^{(\infty)}({\bf q})$ coincides with $U({\bf q})$ for almost all ${\bf q}$ (i.e., $U^{(\infty)}$ can be different from $U$ only on a measure zero set), such that the square modulus of the wave function in the coordinate (momentum) representation approximately equals the coordinate (momentum) distribution of the classical ensemble within an arbitrary given accuracy. Furthermore, the trajectories of this classical ensemble, generally speaking, need not coincide with the trajectories obtained from de Broglie--Bohmian mechanics. Consequences of this result are discussed.

arXiv:1008.2025Aug 11, 20100 citations

Bohmian Mechanics Revisited

E. Deotto, G. C. Ghirardi

arXiv:quant-ph/9704021Foundations of PhysicsJan 1, 1998145 citations

Reformulation of Bohmian mechanics

Moise Borilla Licea

Bohmian mechanics as formulated originally in 1952, has been useful in the implementation of numerical methods applied to quantum mechanics. The scientific community though has had ever since a critical thought about it. Therefore, there are still points to be clarified and rectified. The two main problems are basically: Bohmian mechanics gives a privilege role to the position representation. Secondly, the current interpretation of Bohmian trajectories has been recently proven wrong. In this context, in Chapter 2, new complex Bohmian quantities are defined; so that they allow the capacity to formulate Bohmian mechanics in any arbitrary continuous representation, for instance, the momentum representation. This Chapter is fully based on two articles, regarding the proposed complex Bohmian formulation and its extension into momentum space. Chapter 3 deals with a redefinition and reinterpretation of the Bohmian trajectories from the handling of the continuity equation, this is done without any need of additional postulates or interpretations. Also, it is proved that Bohmian mechanics is actually more than a projective aspect of the Wigner function. As a third point, Chapter 4 presents a sytematic treatment of the hydrodynamic scheme of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a brief summary of the transport equations in Bohmian mechanics is done. Next, a unified hydrodynamic treatment is found for the Bohmian mechanics. This treatment is useful to sketch, a Bohmian treatment to efficiently find the steady value of the transmission integral. In Chapter 5 conclusions of this thesis are drawn.Bohmian mechanics as formulated originally in 1952, has been useful in the implementation of numerical methods applied to quantum mechanics. The scientific community though has had ever since a critical thought about it. Therefore, there are still points to be clarified and rectified. The two main problems are basically: Bohmian mechanics gives a privilege role to the position representation. Secondly, the current interpretation of Bohmian trajectories has been recently proven wrong. In this context, in Chapter 2, new complex Bohmian quantities are defined; so that they allow the capacity to formulate Bohmian mechanics in any arbitrary continuous representation, for instance, the momentum representation. This Chapter is fully based on two articles, regarding the proposed complex Bohmian formulation and its extension into momentum space. Chapter 3 deals with a redefinition and reinterpretation of the Bohmian trajectories from the handling of the continuity equation, this is done without any need of additional postulates or interpretations. Also, it is proved that Bohmian mechanics is actually more than a projective aspect of the Wigner function. As a third point, Chapter 4 presents a sytematic treatment of the hydrodynamic scheme of Bohmian mechanics. Then, a brief summary of the transport equations in Bohmian mechanics is done. Next, a unified hydrodynamic treatment is found for the Bohmian mechanics. This treatment is useful to sketch, a Bohmian treatment to efficiently find the steady value of the transmission integral. In Chapter 5 conclusions of this thesis are drawn.

Jan 1, 20210 citations

Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory

Detlef Dürr, Sheldon Goldstein, Nino Zanghı̀

Springer eBooksNov 6, 20120 citations

On the Interpretation of Bohmian Mechanics

Arthur I. Fine

Boston studies in the philosophy of scienceJan 1, 199613 citations

It is shown that for any given quantum system evolving unitarily with the Hamiltonian,

\hat{H} = \hat{\bf p}^2/(2m) + U({\bf q})

, [bold letters denote

D

-dimensional (

D \geqslant 3

) vectors] and with a sufficiently smooth potential

U({\bf q})

, there exits a classical ensemble with the Hamilton function, $\mathrsfs{H} ({\bf p}, {\bf q}) = {\bf p}^2/(2m) + U^{(\infty)} ({\bf q})$, where the potential

U^{(\infty)}({\bf q})

coincides with

U({\bf q})

for almost all

{\bf q}

(i.e.,

U^{(\infty)}

can be different from

U

only on a measure zero set), such that the square modulus of the wave function in the coordinate (momentum) representation approximately equals the coordinate (momentum) distribution of the classical ensemble within an arbitrary given accuracy. Furthermore, the trajectories of this classical ensemble, generally speaking, need not coincide with the trajectories obtained from de Broglie--Bohmian mechanics. Consequences of this result are discussed.