Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

APS

Disorder versus Interaction in the Hubbard Model

M. Ulmke

Published May 1, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Disorder and Interactions in the Hubbard Model

Gergely T. Zimányi, Elihu Abrahams

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Effect of interactions, disorder and magnetic field in the Hubbard model in two dimensions

Nandini Trivedi, P. J. H. Denteneer, Dariush Heidarian +1 more

Pramana•Jun 1, 2005•6 citations

Two-body mobility edge in the Anderson-Hubbard model: molecular versus scattering states

Filippo Stellin, Giuliano Orso

Most of our quantitative understanding of disorder-induced metal-insulator transitions comes from numerical studies of simple noninteracting tight-binding models, like the Anderson model in three dimensions. An important outstanding problem is the fate of the Anderson transition in the presence of additional Hubbard interactions of strength $U$ between particles. Based on large-scale numerics, we compute the position of the mobility edge for a system of two identical bosons or two fermions with opposite spin component. The resulting phase diagram in the interaction-energy-disorder space possesses a remarkably rich and counterintuitive structure, with multiple metallic and insulating phases. We show that this phenomenon originates from the molecular or scattering-like nature of the pair states available at given energy and disorder strength. The behavior of the disorder-averaged density of states of the effective model for the pair is also discussed.

•Apr 7, 2020•0 citations

Two-body mobility edge in the Anderson-Hubbard model in three dimensions: Molecular versus scattering states

Filippo Stellin, Giuliano Orso

Most of our quantitative understanding of disorder-induced metal-insulator transitions comes from numerical studies of simple noninteracting tight-binding models, like the Anderson model in three dimensions.An important outstanding problem is the fate of the Anderson transition in the presence of additional Hubbard interactions of strength U between particles.Based on large-scale numerics, we compute the position of the mobility edge for a system of two identical bosons or two fermions with opposite spin components.The resulting phase diagram in the interaction-energy-disorder space possesses a remarkably rich and counterintuitive structure, with multiple metallic and insulating phases.We show that this phenomenon originates from the molecular or scatteringlike nature of the pair states available at given energy E and disorder strength W .The disorder-averaged density of states of the effective model for the pair is also investigated.Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for ongoing research on many-body localization.

arXiv:2004.03506•Physical Review Research•Sep 28, 2020•5 citations

Progress toward the Disordered Hubbard Model

William McGehee, Stanimir Kondov, J. J. Zirbel +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 15, 2011•0 citations

Even-odd correlations in capacitance fluctuations of quantum dots

O. Prus, Assa Auerbach, Yael Aloni +2 more

We investigate effects of short-range interactions on the addition spectra of quantum dots using a disordered Hubbard model. A correlation function S(q) is defined on the inverse compressibility versus filling data, and computed numerically for small lattices. Two regimes of interaction strength are identified: the even/odd fluctuations regime typical of Fermi-liquid ground states, and a regime of structureless S(q) at strong interactions. We propose to understand the latter regime in terms of magnetically correlated localized spins. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:cond-mat/9607057•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Nov 15, 1996•20 citations
Most of our quantitative understanding of disorder-induced metal-insulator transitions comes from numerical studies of simple noninteracting tight-binding models, like the Anderson model in three dimensions. An important outstanding problem is the fate of the Anderson transition in the presence of additional Hubbard interactions of strength UUU between particles. Based on large-scale numerics, we compute the position of the mobility edge for a system of two identical bosons or two fermions with opposite spin component. The resulting phase diagram in the interaction-energy-disorder space possesses a remarkably rich and counterintuitive structure, with multiple metallic and insulating phases. We show that this phenomenon originates from the molecular or scattering-like nature of the pair states available at given energy and disorder strength. The behavior of the disorder-averaged density of states of the effective model for the pair is also discussed.
Most of our quantitative understanding of disorder-induced metal-insulator transitions comes from numerical studies of simple noninteracting tight-binding models, like the Anderson model in three dimensions.An important outstanding problem is the fate of the Anderson transition in the presence of additional Hubbard interactions of strength U between particles.Based on large-scale numerics, we compute the position of the mobility edge for a system of two identical bosons or two fermions with opposite spin components.The resulting phase diagram in the interaction-energy-disorder space possesses a remarkably rich and counterintuitive structure, with multiple metallic and insulating phases.We show that this phenomenon originates from the molecular or scatteringlike nature of the pair states available at given energy E and disorder strength W .The disorder-averaged density of states of the effective model for the pair is also investigated.Finally, we discuss the implications of our results for ongoing research on many-body localization.
We investigate effects of short-range interactions on the addition spectra of quantum dots using a disordered Hubbard model. A correlation function S(q) is defined on the inverse compressibility versus filling data, and computed numerically for small lattices. Two regimes of interaction strength are identified: the even/odd fluctuations regime typical of Fermi-liquid ground states, and a regime of structureless S(q) at strong interactions. We propose to understand the latter regime in terms of magnetically correlated localized spins. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.