Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Decoherence, Chaos, and the Physics of Information

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

Published Jan 1, 1998• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

DECOHERENCE, CHAOS AND THE SECOND LAW

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

Time and Matter International Colloquium on the Science of Time•Feb 1, 2006•9 citations

Thermofield dynamics: Quantum chaos versus decoherence

Zhenyu Xu, Aurélia Chenu, Tomaž Prosen +1 more

Quantum chaos imposes universal spectral signatures that govern the thermofield dynamics of a many-body system in isolation. The fidelity between the initial and time-evolving thermofield double states exhibits as a function of time a decay, dip, ramp, and plateau. Sources of decoherence give rise to a nonunitary evolution and result in information loss. Energy dephasing gradually suppresses quantum noise fluctuations and the dip associated with spectral correlations. Decoherence further delays the appearance of the dip and shortens the span of the linear ramp associated with chaotic behavior. The interplay between signatures of quantum chaos and information loss is determined by the competition among the decoherence, dip, and plateau characteristic times, as demonstrated in the stochastic Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model.

arXiv:2008.06444•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Feb 19, 2021•64 citations

A Projection-Neutral Theory of Quantum Chaos

Doug Doucette

This paper presents a fundamental reinterpretation of quantum chaos, arguing that the connection between quantum complexity and operational failure—such as decoherence, information loss, or leakage from protected quantum states—has been poorly understood. The author proposes that quantum chaos should be viewed through the Trojan framework of thin and thick chaos, where projection onto operational variables plays the central role. The core insight is that a quantum system may display all the traditional signatures of chaos—Wigner-Dyson spectral statistics, rapid operator growth, entanglement spreading—yet remain operationally harmless. The key distinction is whether the projected quantum state, rather than the full quantum state, reaches a failure region. This is analogous to classical systems where local instability may remain confined (thin chaos) or may connect to failure (thick chaos). The paper establishes a Quantum Projection-Containment Theorem, which provides a rigorous sufficient condition for avoiding failure: as long as the projected quantum displacement remains smaller than the distance to the failure set, the system remains quantum-thin regardless of its spectral complexity. The Quantum Thinness Ratio is introduced as a quantitative diagnostic, comparing actual projected motion with the available safety margin. Several quantum protection mechanisms are identified that keep chaos thin: spectral gaps that suppress transitions from protected subspaces, symmetries and selection rules that create invariant sectors, localization that prevents delocalization failure, and quantum error-correcting codes that protect logical information even when physical degrees of freedom are chaotic. Quantum thickening occurs when these protections fail—through gap collapse, symmetry breaking, delocalization, or code failure—allowing quantum chaos to become operational failure. The paper provides a practical protocol for diagnosing quantum thinness and emphasizes that quantum chaos is not automatically decoherence. The difference between harmless quantum complexity and operational failure is reachability: chaos becomes thick only when information spreading or leakage reaches protected variables. This framework unifies classical and quantum understandings of stability while respecting the fundamental differences between trajectories and quantum states.

•Aug 20, 2026•0 citations

The Physics of Quantum Information

Dirk Bouwmeester, ARTUR K. EKERT, Anton Zeilinger

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2000•1,982 citations

Decoherence, determinism and chaos revisited

H. Pierre Noyes

Springer eBooks•Jan 4, 2007•2 citations

Quantum Chaos: Harnessing Chaos Control to Mitigate Decoherence in Quantum Systems

Jincheng Zhang

Decoherence, the process by which quantum systems lose their quantum properties due to interaction with the environment, poses a significant challenge to the development and application of quantum information processing. This work explores a novel approach to mitigating decoherence by leveraging principles from chaos theory – specifically, chaos control. We investigate how controlled chaotic dynamics can be employed to effectively counteract the detrimental effects of decoherence, ultimately aiming to prolong the coherence time of quantum states. The core idea is to introduce carefully designed external drives that induce chaotic behavior within the quantum system, effectively 'smearing out' the decoherence process. This approach contrasts with traditional methods, which often focus on isolating the quantum system from its environment. We present a theoretical framework for analyzing this interaction, utilizing concepts such as Lyapunov exponents and phase space reconstruction to characterize the chaotic dynamics and quantify the impact on decoherence. Our results suggest a promising new avenue for quantum information protection, potentially leading to more robust and efficient quantum computing and communication technologies. We define key parameters such as the initial state of the system (s_0), the external driving force (F), the system Hamiltonian (H), and the decoherence rate (γ). The effectiveness of this approach is quantified through the evolution of the quantum state, represented by the time-dependent probability amplitudes (ψ(t)).

•Sep 4, 2026•0 citations
Quantum chaos imposes universal spectral signatures that govern the thermofield dynamics of a many-body system in isolation. The fidelity between the initial and time-evolving thermofield double states exhibits as a function of time a decay, dip, ramp, and plateau. Sources of decoherence give rise to a nonunitary evolution and result in information loss. Energy dephasing gradually suppresses quantum noise fluctuations and the dip associated with spectral correlations. Decoherence further delays the appearance of the dip and shortens the span of the linear ramp associated with chaotic behavior. The interplay between signatures of quantum chaos and information loss is determined by the competition among the decoherence, dip, and plateau characteristic times, as demonstrated in the stochastic Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model.
This paper presents a fundamental reinterpretation of quantum chaos, arguing that the connection between quantum complexity and operational failure—such as decoherence, information loss, or leakage from protected quantum states—has been poorly understood. The author proposes that quantum chaos should be viewed through the Trojan framework of thin and thick chaos, where projection onto operational variables plays the central role. The core insight is that a quantum system may display all the traditional signatures of chaos—Wigner-Dyson spectral statistics, rapid operator growth, entanglement spreading—yet remain operationally harmless. The key distinction is whether the projected quantum state, rather than the full quantum state, reaches a failure region. This is analogous to classical systems where local instability may remain confined (thin chaos) or may connect to failure (thick chaos). The paper establishes a Quantum Projection-Containment Theorem, which provides a rigorous sufficient condition for avoiding failure: as long as the projected quantum displacement remains smaller than the distance to the failure set, the system remains quantum-thin regardless of its spectral complexity. The Quantum Thinness Ratio is introduced as a quantitative diagnostic, comparing actual projected motion with the available safety margin. Several quantum protection mechanisms are identified that keep chaos thin: spectral gaps that suppress transitions from protected subspaces, symmetries and selection rules that create invariant sectors, localization that prevents delocalization failure, and quantum error-correcting codes that protect logical information even when physical degrees of freedom are chaotic. Quantum thickening occurs when these protections fail—through gap collapse, symmetry breaking, delocalization, or code failure—allowing quantum chaos to become operational failure. The paper provides a practical protocol for diagnosing quantum thinness and emphasizes that quantum chaos is not automatically decoherence. The difference between harmless quantum complexity and operational failure is reachability: chaos becomes thick only when information spreading or leakage reaches protected variables. This framework unifies classical and quantum understandings of stability while respecting the fundamental differences between trajectories and quantum states.
Decoherence, the process by which quantum systems lose their quantum properties due to interaction with the environment, poses a significant challenge to the development and application of quantum information processing. This work explores a novel approach to mitigating decoherence by leveraging principles from chaos theory – specifically, chaos control. We investigate how controlled chaotic dynamics can be employed to effectively counteract the detrimental effects of decoherence, ultimately aiming to prolong the coherence time of quantum states. The core idea is to introduce carefully designed external drives that induce chaotic behavior within the quantum system, effectively 'smearing out' the decoherence process. This approach contrasts with traditional methods, which often focus on isolating the quantum system from its environment. We present a theoretical framework for analyzing this interaction, utilizing concepts such as Lyapunov exponents and phase space reconstruction to characterize the chaotic dynamics and quantify the impact on decoherence. Our results suggest a promising new avenue for quantum information protection, potentially leading to more robust and efficient quantum computing and communication technologies. We define key parameters such as the initial state of the system (s_0), the external driving force (F), the system Hamiltonian (H), and the decoherence rate (γ). The effectiveness of this approach is quantified through the evolution of the quantum state, represented by the time-dependent probability amplitudes (ψ(t)).