Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Vacuum modes in Homodyne detection

S. A. Wadood, Justin T. Schultz, A. Nick Vamivakas, Carlos R. Stroud

Published Mar 8, 2018• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Toward perfect homodyne detection of twin vacuum beams

Li Tian, Travis Horrom, Brian D. O. Anderson +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•May 26, 2016•0 citations

Influence of the Local Oscillator on Homodyne Detection of Squeezed Vacuum

B. Hüttner, Y. Ben-Aryeh

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Impact of imperfect homodyne detection on measurements of vacuum states shot noise

Margarida Almeida, Daniel Pereira, M. Facão +2 more

Optical and Quantum Electronics•Nov 1, 2020•17 citations

Practical resources and measurements for lossy optical quantum metrology

Changhun Oh, Su-Yong Lee, Hyunchul Nha +1 more

We study the sensitivity of phase estimation in a lossy Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) using two general, and practical, resources generated by a laser and a nonlinear optical medium with passive optimal elements, which are readily available in the laboratory: One is a two-mode separable coherent and squeezed vacuum state at a beam splitter and the other is a two-mode squeezed vacuum state. In view of the ultimate precision given by quantum Fisher information, we show that the two-mode squeezed vacuum state can achieve a lower bound of estimation error than the coherent and squeezed vacuum state under a photon-loss channel. We further consider practical measurement schemes, homodyne detection and photon number resolving detection (PNRD), to characterize the accuracy of phase estimation in reality and find that the coherent and squeezed vacuum state largely achieves a lower bound than the two-mode squeezed vacuum in the lossy MZI while maintaining quantum enhancement over the shot-noise limit. By comparing homodyne detection and PNRD, we demonstrate that quadrature measurement with homodyne detection is more robust against photon loss than parity measurement with PNRD. We also show that double homodyne detection can provide a better tool for phase estimation than single homodyne detection against photon loss.

arXiv:1707.03210•Physical Review A•Dec 4, 2017•37 citations

Quantum Noise in Homodyne Detection

R. Loudon

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 1986•6 citations

Pulsed squeezed vacuum characterization without homodyning

Jérôme Wenger, Fiurasek, J., Rosa Tualle-Brouri +2 more

Direct photon detection is experimentally implemented to measure the squeezing and purity of a single-mode squeezed vacuum state without an interferometric homodyne detection. Following a recent theoretical proposal [arXiv quant-ph/0311119], the setup only requires a tunable beamsplitter and a single-photon detector to fully characterize the generated Gaussian states. The experimental implementation of this procedure is discussed and compared with other reference methods.

•Jan 1, 2004•1 citation
We study the sensitivity of phase estimation in a lossy Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) using two general, and practical, resources generated by a laser and a nonlinear optical medium with passive optimal elements, which are readily available in the laboratory: One is a two-mode separable coherent and squeezed vacuum state at a beam splitter and the other is a two-mode squeezed vacuum state. In view of the ultimate precision given by quantum Fisher information, we show that the two-mode squeezed vacuum state can achieve a lower bound of estimation error than the coherent and squeezed vacuum state under a photon-loss channel. We further consider practical measurement schemes, homodyne detection and photon number resolving detection (PNRD), to characterize the accuracy of phase estimation in reality and find that the coherent and squeezed vacuum state largely achieves a lower bound than the two-mode squeezed vacuum in the lossy MZI while maintaining quantum enhancement over the shot-noise limit. By comparing homodyne detection and PNRD, we demonstrate that quadrature measurement with homodyne detection is more robust against photon loss than parity measurement with PNRD. We also show that double homodyne detection can provide a better tool for phase estimation than single homodyne detection against photon loss.