Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) is one of the foundational achievements of modern cryptog-raphy, allowing multiple, distrusting, parties to jointly compute a function of their inputs, while revealing nothing but the output of the function. Following the seminal works of Yao and Goldreich, Micali and Wigderson and Ben-Or, Goldwasser and Wigderson, the study of MPC has expanded to consider a wide variety of questions, including variants in the attack model, underlying assumptions, complexity and composability of the resulting protocols. One question that appears to have received very little attention, however, is that of MPC over an underlying communication network whose structure is, in itself, sensitive information. This question, in addition to being of pure theoretical interest, arises naturally in many contexts: designing privacy-preserving social-networks, private peer-to-peer computations, vehicle-to-vehicle networks and the “in-ternet of things ” are some of the examples. In this paper, we initiate the study of “topology-hiding computation ” in the computational setting. We give formal definitions in both simulation-based and indistinguishability-based flavors. We show that, even for fail-stop adversaries, there are some strong impossibility results. Despite this, we show that protocols for topology-hiding computation can be constructed in the semi-honest and fail-stop models, if we somewhat restrict the set of nodes the adversary may corrupt.
Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) is one of the foundational achievements of modern cryptog-raphy, allowing multiple, distrusting, parties to jointly compute a function of their inputs, while revealing nothing but the output of the function. Following the seminal works of Yao and Goldreich, Micali and Wigderson and Ben-Or, Goldwasser and Wigderson, the study of MPC has expanded to consider a wide variety of questions, including variants in the attack model, underlying assumptions, complexity and composability of the resulting protocols. One question that appears to have received very little attention, however, is that of MPC over an underlying communication network whose structure is, in itself, sensitive information. This question, in addition to being of pure theoretical interest, arises naturally in many contexts: designing privacy-preserving social-networks, private peer-to-peer computations, vehicle-to-vehicle networks and the “in-ternet of things ” are some of the examples. In this paper, we initiate the study of “topology-hiding computation ” in the computational setting. We give formal definitions in both simulation-based and indistinguishability-based flavors. We show that, even for fail-stop adversaries, there are some strong impossibility results. Despite this, we show that protocols for topology-hiding computation can be constructed in the semi-honest and fail-stop models, if we somewhat restrict the set of nodes the adversary may corrupt.
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is one of the most important primitives in cryptography. Several directions to construct and improve MPC protocols have been studied over the past decades. The majority of existing MPC protocols rely on assumptions such as every party communicates with every other party or every party needs to know every other party and the computation algorithm well in advance. Such assumptions can be difficult to achieve in modern large scale networks. This thesis explores two distinct lines of work leading to new practical models in response to these scenarios.First, we examine communication locality, the total number of other parties that each party communicates with in the protocol, as a new measure for an MPC protocol. Although progress has been made, the question of achieving low communication locality and round complexity at the same time for adaptive adversaries corrupting t l n/2 parties remains open. We show that by assuming a public-key infrastructure (PKI) and a symmetric-key infrastructure (SKI) the above question can be answered affirmatively, under standard assumptions. In particular, we describe a protocol with polylogarithmic communication locality and round complexity which tolerates up to t l n/2 adaptive corruptions. Our results are based on a new model of hidden random graphs obtained from the SKI, and using them to emulate a complete network in polylogarithmic rounds and polylogarithmic locality.We then examine multi-key fully homomorphic encryption (MFHE) schemes, which allow computation on data encrypted under different public keys chosen independently of each other. One of the main problems left in MFHE has been on how to deal with malicious users without trusted setup assumptions. We show how this can be done through circuit privacy, which guarantees that even if both ciphertexts and public keys are not well-formed, no information is revealed regarding the computation, other than what follows from the output on some well-formed inputs. Generalizing the result for circuit-private FHE, we provide a framework for adding circuit privacy to existing MFHE schemes.Finally, we incorporate the circuit privacy in a variant of server-assisted MPC, called on-the-fly MPC, where a server or a “cloud” performs an arbitrary dynamically chosen computation on a subset of data uploaded by multiple clients and encrypted under different keys on-the-fly. Circuit privacy allows the server to keep the algorithm used in the computation private even from a malicious adversary corrupting any number of clients. In particular, we construct a three-round on-the-fly MPC protocol with circuit privacy against malicious clients without the trusted setup.
Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is one of the most important primitives in cryptography. Several directions to construct and improve MPC protocols have been studied over the past decades. The majority of existing MPC protocols rely on assumptions such as every party communicates with every other party or every party needs to know every other party and the computation algorithm well in advance. Such assumptions can be difficult to achieve in modern large scale networks. This thesis explores two distinct lines of work leading to new practical models in response to these scenarios.First, we examine communication locality, the total number of other parties that each party communicates with in the protocol, as a new measure for an MPC protocol. Although progress has been made, the question of achieving low communication locality and round complexity at the same time for adaptive adversaries corrupting t < n/2 parties remains open. We show that by assuming a public-key infrastructure (PKI) and a symmetric-key infrastructure (SKI) the above question can be answered affirmatively, under standard assumptions. In particular, we describe a protocol with polylogarithmic communication locality and round complexity which tolerates up to t < n/2 adaptive corruptions. Our results are based on a new model of hidden random graphs obtained from the SKI, and using them to emulate a complete network in polylogarithmic rounds and polylogarithmic locality.We then examine multi-key fully homomorphic encryption (MFHE) schemes, which allow computation on data encrypted under different public keys chosen independently of each other. One of the main problems left in MFHE has been on how to deal with malicious users without trusted setup assumptions. We show how this can be done through circuit privacy, which guarantees that even if both ciphertexts and public keys are not well-formed, no information is revealed regarding the computation, other than what follows from the output on some well-formed inputs. Generalizing the result for circuit-private FHE, we provide a framework for adding circuit privacy to existing MFHE schemes.Finally, we incorporate the circuit privacy in a variant of server-assisted MPC, called on-the-fly MPC, where a server or a “cloud” performs an arbitrary dynamically chosen computation on a subset of data uploaded by multiple clients and encrypted under different keys on-the-fly. Circuit privacy allows the server to keep the algorithm used in the computation private even from a malicious adversary corrupting any number of clients. In particular, we construct a three-round on-the-fly MPC protocol with circuit privacy against malicious clients without the trusted setup.
In 1982, Yao presented a protocol that allowed two parties to compute over their private inputs while revealing nothing but the final output. This first theoretical construction originated a fruitful line of research exploring the possibilities of the cryptographic technique known as multi-party computation, or MPC. Today, we have MPC schemes with practical efficiency that can be used for a wide range of applications and use cases, from securing cryptographic keys to training Machine Learning models on private data. Despite the advancements from the past few decades, we have only started to bridge the gap between theory and practice, and several obstacles stand in the way of the widespread adoption of MPC. First, the performance overhead depends heavily on the computation we want to perform. Not all computations are well-suited to be distributed with MPC, and algorithms must usually be refactored before they can be executed securely. Furthermore, the practical efficiency of most modern protocols quickly deteriorates as the number of parties increases and comes at the expense of the security guarantees provided. On the other hand, almost all academic works assume a static set of MPC parties, all pairwise connected by dedicated channels in a network without delays or failures. Yet, these assumptions are hardly achievable in current real-world networks. In this thesis, we study three practical aspects of multi-party computation: (i) we discuss how to improve performance by designing algorithms tailor-made for execution with MPC. To this end, we present and evaluate secure auction mechanisms for the financial setting and for the peer-to-peer electricity market. (ii) We analyse the information leakage from the MPC computation outputs. In particular, we focus on the case of individual and private correlated outputs, for which we propose a new privacy notion. Lastly, (iii) we consider the problem of building efficient large-scale MPC. We explore the possibilities and limitations associated with standard (fully connected) networks and present a new protocol with a star-like network topology and resilience against delayed parties.
Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) is an expression encompassing cryptographic techniques that allow mutually distrustful parties to jointly perform computations over private data, ensuring correctness and preserving privacy despite malicious behavior. Guaranteed output is the strongest security goal for MPC: protocols with this property always deliver results. This is in contrast with weaker notions that allow malicious aborts. The seminal works of Ben-Or, Goldwasser, and Wigderson (STOC’88) and Rabin and Ben-Or (STOC’89) showed interactive protocols to compute any function with guaranteed output and perfect security if fewer than one third of parties are corrupted, or with statistical security (with a small error probability) if fewer than half are corrupted. These results hold when the set of participants is fixed throughout the execution. Ostrovsky and Yung’s proactive model (PODC’91) relaxes this assumption by allowing the set of corrupted parties to evolve over time, better capturing the dynamics of long-lived computations, where machines may be periodically compromised and recovered. The recent YOSO (You Only Speak Once) and fluid MPC models (CRYPTO’21) push this ambitious modelling even further by allowing for fully dynamic participation, with parties joining and leaving the computation at will. In this setting, known protocols with guaranteed output fall short of optimal resilience or rely on non-standard communication and adversarial assumptions. Matching the classical BGW and Rabin–Ben-Or bounds in these settings remained an open problem. We resolve these questions within the Layered MPC abstraction of David et al. (CRYPTO’23), in which the interaction pattern of a protocol is restricted to be a layered graph, meaning parties are partitioned into a sequence of disjoint sets (layers) and can send private and broadcast messages to parties in immediately subsequent layers. We match the BGW and Rabin and Ben-Or bounds in this model, fully characterizing the feasibility landscape of Layered MPC with guaranteed output. As a stepping stone towards our statistically secure protocol, we construct a more efficient and conceptually simpler computationally secure protocol relying on linear non-interactive commitments. Our results yield optimally-resilient and maximally-proactive MPC protocols with guaranteed output for both perfect and statistical security.
Secure Multi-party Computation (MPC) considers the problem where a set of mutually distrusting parties want to jointly compute a function over their private inputs, without revealing any extra information about these inputs other than what it can be inferred from the output of the function. This setting is well-motivated, and it has many real-world applications such as auction, voting, etc. MPC can be also seen as a generalization of many natural cryptographic primitives. For example, zero-knowledge (ZK) can be viewed as a special case of two-party secure computation. In ZK, a party, called prover aims to convince a second party, called verifier, that the prover’s private input witness w and a public input statement x belong to a relation R. An important research direction in secure computation is to find the trade-off between the required setup (e.g., the use of the broadcast channel, the use of common reference string (CRS) / public key infrastructure (PKI), the upper bound of the parties that can be corrupted, etc.), and the security guarantees that can be achieved. The setups can be viewed as some general assumptions that the protocol needs to satisfy, and they influence the usability of the protocol in real-world scenarios. In principle, having simpler (or no) setups mean that the protocol is more general and can be more useful in real-world scenarios. At the same time, having simpler setups may lead to weaker security guarantees. Therefore, finding the trade-off between setup and security guarantees is important and meaningful. In this thesis, we target MPC and ZK, and we focus on how to minimize the setup for MPC and ZK while still providing meaningful levels of security. More specifically: Regarding MPC, we focus on the dishonest majority (i.e., the adversary can corrupt all but one party), and we aim at 1) minimizing the use of broadcast channels. 2) studying the MPC with pre-processing when no setup is available. • Informally, a broadcast channel guarantees that when a message is sent, this reaches all the parties, without ambiguity. It also guarantees that if an honest party receives a message from a corrupted party, then it is guaranteed that all the honest parties have received the message. To realize broadcast, parties in the protocol could run the broadcast protocol, which may require many rounds of peer-to-peer communications. An alternative way is to rely on physical or external infrastructure such as blockchain. In both cases, broadcast is expensive, as such, we want to minimize its use. In particular, this thesis presents the following results: – When assuming no setup, we give a complete characterization with respect to the use of broadcast channels, and we obtain the optimal results. – We consider the same problem for the case that we only want to allow the black-box use (i.e., do not have access to the code of the algorithm) of the oblivious transfer protocol. We also give a characterization. • In the standard definition of MPC, the parties’ private inputs are fixed before the start of the protocol. However, there is another type of MPC named MPC with pre-processing, where the protocol can pre-compute some messages without using parties’ inputs, and these messages can accelerate computations in the online phase (i.e., other computations that require parties’ inputs). Since some expensive computations can be pre-computed, the online phase could be more lightweight. Therefore, we want to remove the dependency of the input from as many rounds as possible, so that we can do some pre-processing. In this direction, we explore the protocol with no setup. We provide a compiler that can turn a big class of MPC protocol that may require the inputs already to compute the first round, into a new protocol that needs the inputs only in the last two rounds. We also propose new MPC definitions that capture this delayed-input features. Regarding ZK, we do the following: • In standard single-theorem ZK definition, the security of the ZK protocol is guaranteed to hold only when one proof is issued. In the case where multiple zero-knowledge proofs need to be issued (i.e., to prove multiple NP statements), each new zero-knowledge proof requires a freshly generated setup. In the multi-theorem ZK definition, instead, one setup is sufficient for generating multiple zero-knowledge proofs for multiple instances. We propose a multi-theorem protocol (in the format of a compiler) that follows the Fiat-Shamir paradigm and relies on correlation intractable hash functions. Moreover, our protocol remains zero-knowledge and sound even against adversaries that choose the statement to be proven (and the witness for the case of zero-knowledge) adaptively on the key of the hash function. Prior works could achieve this adaptive security only inefficiently via NP reductions. • ZK protocols are secure only when all setups are correctly generated, but in real-world scenarios, some of the setups may not be correctly generated. For instance, to run a non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) protocol, the setup CRS could be chosen with bias. In this case, the security of the NIZK protocol does not hold anymore. Instead of finding a secure ZK candidate, one alternative solution is to have multiple instantiations of ZK candidates and assume that only for a subset of them the setup is generated correctly. More formally, we consider the case where only a subset of the instances are secure. In more detail, given access to n candidate instantiations of a NIZK for some language, we want to have a construction that itself implements a NIZK for the same language without relying on any additional computational assumptions. We refer to this type of construction as combiner, and the combiner is secure assuming at least t of the given candidates are secure. In this work, we provide three different constructions of robust NIZK combiners and show that combiners are impossible to realize unless the majority of the input candidates are secure.
The notion of secure computation is central to cryptography. Introduced in the seminal works of Yao [FOCS'82, FOCS'86] and Goldreich, Micali and Wigderson [STOC'87], secure multiparty computation allows a group of (mutually) distrustful parties to jointly compute any functionality over their individual private inputs in such a manner that the honest parties obtain the correct outputs and no group of malicious parties learn anything beyond their inputs and the prescribed outputs. General feasibility results for secure computation were given by Yao [FOCS'86] and Goldreich et al. [STOC'87] more than two decades ago. Subsequent to these works, designing secure computation protocols that can tolerate more powerful adversaries and satisfy stronger notions of security has been a very active area of research. In this dissertation, we study two such new frontiers in the area of secure computation.
In the first part of this dissertation, we initiate a study of designing leakage-resilient interactive protocols. Specifically, we consider the scenario where an adversary, in addition to corrupting a subset of parties, can leak (potentially via physical attacks) arbitrary information from the secret state of any honest party. This is in contrast to the standard notion of secure computation where it is assumed that the adversary only has black-box'' access to the honest parties. In particular, we formalize a meaningful definition of leakage-resilient zero knowledge proof systems and provide constructions that satisfy our notion. We also discuss various applications of our results.
The second part of this dissertation concerns with the general question of whether it is possible to securely run cryptographic protocols over an insecure network environment such as the Internet. It is well-known that the standard notion of secure computation is only relevant to the stand-alone setting where a single protocol is being executed in isolation; as such it does not guarantee security when multiple protocol sessions may be executed concurrently under the control of an adversary who is present across all sessions. We consider the open problem of constructing secure password-based authenticated key exchange protocols in such a setting in the plain model (i.e., without assuming any trusted infrastructure or random oracles). We give the first construction of such a protocol based on standard cryptographic assumptions. Our results are in fact much more general, and extend to other functionalities w.r.t. a (necessarily) weakened notion of concurrently secure computation.
The results presented in this dissertation stem from two papers which are joint works with Sanjam Garg and Amit Sahai, and with Vipul Goyal and Rafail Ostrovsky, respectively.