Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Oxford University Press eBooks

Phase Transitions for Quantum Search Algorithms

Tad Hogg

Published Dec 15, 2005• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Phase transitions have long been studied empirically in various combinatorial searches and theoretically in simplified models [91, 264, 301, 490]. The analogy with statistical physics [397], explored throughout this volume, shows how the many local choices made during search relate to global properties such as the resulting search cost. These studies have led to a better understanding of typical search behaviors [514] and improved search methods [195, 247, 261, 432, 433]. Among the current research questions in this field are the range of algorithms exhibiting the transition behavior and the algorithm-independent problem properties associated with the difficult instances concentrated near the transition. Towards this end, the present chapter examines quantum computer [123, 126, 158, 486] algorithms for nondeterministic polynomial (NP) combinatorial search problems [191]. As with many conventional methods, they exhibit the easy-hard-easy pattern of computational cost as the degree of constraint in the problems varies. We describe how properties of the search space affect the algorithms and identify an additional structural property, the energy gap, motivated by one quantum algorithm but applicable to a variety of techniques, both quantum and classical. Thus, the study of quantum search algorithms not only extends the range of algorithms exhibiting phase transitions, but also helps identify underlying structural properties. Specifically, the next two sections describe a class of hard search problems and the form of quantum search algorithms proposed to date. The remainder of the chapter presents algorithm behaviors, relevant problem structure, arid an approximate asymptotic analysis of their cost scaling. The final section discusses various open issues in designing and evaluating quantum algorithms, and relating their behavior to problem structure. The k-satisfiability (k -SAT) problem, as discussed earlier in this volume, consists of n Boolean variables and m clauses. A clause is a logical OR of k variables, each of which may be negated. A solution is an assignment, that is, a value for each variable, TRUE or FALSE, satisfying all the clauses. An assignment is said to conflict with any clause it does not satisfy.

DOI
10.1093/oso/9780195177374.003.0019

Related papers

Quantum Computing and Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Search

Tad Hogg

We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research•Mar 2, 1996•30 citations

Quantum Computing and Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Search

Tad Hogg

We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.

arXiv:cs/9603101•Mar 1, 1996•0 citations

Quantum Computing and Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Search

Tad Hogg

We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.

arXiv:quant-ph/9508012•Aug 16, 1995•0 citations

Solving Random Satisfiability Problems with Quantum Computers

Tad Hogg

Quantum computer algorithms can exploit the structure of random satisfiability problems. This paper extends a previous empirical evaluation of such an algorithm and gives an approximate asymptotic analysis accounting for both the average and variation of amplitudes among search states with the same costs. The analysis predicts good performance, on average, for a variety of problems including those near a phase transition associated with a high concentration of hard cases. Based on empirical evaluation for small problems, modifying the algorithm in light of this analysis improves its performance. The algorithm improves on both GSAT, a commonly used conventional heuristic, and quantum algorithms ignoring problem structure.

arXiv:quant-ph/0104048•Apr 9, 2001•5 citations

Quantum computational phase transition in combinatorial problems

Bingzhi Zhang, Akira Sone, Quntao Zhuang

Abstract Quantum Approximate Optimization algorithm (QAOA) aims to search for approximate solutions to discrete optimization problems with near-term quantum computers. As there are no algorithmic guarantee possible for QAOA to outperform classical computers, without a proof that bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) ≠ nondeterministic polynomial time (NP), it is necessary to investigate the empirical advantages of QAOA. We identify a computational phase transition of QAOA when solving hard problems such as SAT—random instances are most difficult to train at a critical problem density. We connect the transition to the controllability and the complexity of QAOA circuits. Moreover, we find that the critical problem density in general deviates from the SAT-UNSAT phase transition, where the hardest instances for classical algorithms lies. Then, we show that the high problem density region, which limits QAOA’s performance in hard optimization problems (reachability deficits), is actually a good place to utilize QAOA: its approximation ratio has a much slower decay with the problem density, compared to classical approximate algorithms. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that quantum advantages of QAOA over classical approximate algorithms can be identified.

arXiv:2109.13346•npj Quantum Information•Jul 22, 2022•26 citations

Phase transitions and random quantum satisfiability

Chris R. Laumann, Roderich Moessner, Antonello Scardicchio +1 more

Alongside the effort underway to build quantum computers, it is important to better understand which classes of problems they will find easy and which others even they will find intractable. We study random ensembles of the QMA$_1$-complete quantum satisfiability (QSAT) problem introduced by Bravyi. QSAT appropriately generalizes the NP-complete classical satisfiability (SAT) problem. We show that, as the density of clauses/projectors is varied, the ensembles exhibit quantum phase transitions between phases that are satisfiable and unsatisfiable. Remarkably, almost all instances of QSAT for any hypergraph exhibit the same dimension of the satisfying manifold. This establishes the QSAT decision problem as equivalent to a, potentially new, graph theoretic problem and that the hardest typical instances are likely to be localized in a bounded range of clause density.

arXiv:0903.1904•Mar 11, 2009•11 citations
Phase transitions have long been studied empirically in various combinatorial searches and theoretically in simplified models [91, 264, 301, 490]. The analogy with statistical physics [397], explored throughout this volume, shows how the many local choices made during search relate to global properties such as the resulting search cost. These studies have led to a better understanding of typical search behaviors [514] and improved search methods [195, 247, 261, 432, 433]. Among the current research questions in this field are the range of algorithms exhibiting the transition behavior and the algorithm-independent problem properties associated with the difficult instances concentrated near the transition. Towards this end, the present chapter examines quantum computer [123, 126, 158, 486] algorithms for nondeterministic polynomial (NP) combinatorial search problems [191]. As with many conventional methods, they exhibit the easy-hard-easy pattern of computational cost as the degree of constraint in the problems varies. We describe how properties of the search space affect the algorithms and identify an additional structural property, the energy gap, motivated by one quantum algorithm but applicable to a variety of techniques, both quantum and classical. Thus, the study of quantum search algorithms not only extends the range of algorithms exhibiting phase transitions, but also helps identify underlying structural properties. Specifically, the next two sections describe a class of hard search problems and the form of quantum search algorithms proposed to date. The remainder of the chapter presents algorithm behaviors, relevant problem structure, arid an approximate asymptotic analysis of their cost scaling. The final section discusses various open issues in designing and evaluating quantum algorithms, and relating their behavior to problem structure. The k-satisfiability (k -SAT) problem, as discussed earlier in this volume, consists of n Boolean variables and m clauses. A clause is a logical OR of k variables, each of which may be negated. A solution is an assignment, that is, a value for each variable, TRUE or FALSE, satisfying all the clauses. An assignment is said to conflict with any clause it does not satisfy.
We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.
We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.
We introduce an algorithm for combinatorial search on quantum computers that is capable of significantly concentrating amplitude into solutions for some NP search problems, on average. This is done by exploiting the same aspects of problem structure as used by classical backtrack methods to avoid unproductive search choices. This quantum algorithm is much more likely to find solutions than the simple direct use of quantum parallelism. Furthermore, empirical evaluation on small problems shows this quantum algorithm displays the same phase transition behavior, and at the same location, as seen in many previously studied classical search methods. Specifically, difficult problem instances are concentrated near the abrupt change from underconstrained to overconstrained problems.
Quantum computer algorithms can exploit the structure of random satisfiability problems. This paper extends a previous empirical evaluation of such an algorithm and gives an approximate asymptotic analysis accounting for both the average and variation of amplitudes among search states with the same costs. The analysis predicts good performance, on average, for a variety of problems including those near a phase transition associated with a high concentration of hard cases. Based on empirical evaluation for small problems, modifying the algorithm in light of this analysis improves its performance. The algorithm improves on both GSAT, a commonly used conventional heuristic, and quantum algorithms ignoring problem structure.
Abstract Quantum Approximate Optimization algorithm (QAOA) aims to search for approximate solutions to discrete optimization problems with near-term quantum computers. As there are no algorithmic guarantee possible for QAOA to outperform classical computers, without a proof that bounded-error quantum polynomial time (BQP) ≠ nondeterministic polynomial time (NP), it is necessary to investigate the empirical advantages of QAOA. We identify a computational phase transition of QAOA when solving hard problems such as SAT—random instances are most difficult to train at a critical problem density. We connect the transition to the controllability and the complexity of QAOA circuits. Moreover, we find that the critical problem density in general deviates from the SAT-UNSAT phase transition, where the hardest instances for classical algorithms lies. Then, we show that the high problem density region, which limits QAOA’s performance in hard optimization problems (reachability deficits), is actually a good place to utilize QAOA: its approximation ratio has a much slower decay with the problem density, compared to classical approximate algorithms. Indeed, it is exactly in this region that quantum advantages of QAOA over classical approximate algorithms can be identified.
Alongside the effort underway to build quantum computers, it is important to better understand which classes of problems they will find easy and which others even they will find intractable. We study random ensembles of the QMA1_11​-complete quantum satisfiability (QSAT) problem introduced by Bravyi. QSAT appropriately generalizes the NP-complete classical satisfiability (SAT) problem. We show that, as the density of clauses/projectors is varied, the ensembles exhibit quantum phase transitions between phases that are satisfiable and unsatisfiable. Remarkably, almost all instances of QSAT for any hypergraph exhibit the same dimension of the satisfying manifold. This establishes the QSAT decision problem as equivalent to a, potentially new, graph theoretic problem and that the hardest typical instances are likely to be localized in a bounded range of clause density.