The design of decoding algorithms is a significant technological component in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers. Often design of quantum decoders is inspired by classical decoding algorithms, but there are no general principles for building quantum decoders from classical decoders. Given any pair of classical codes, we can build a quantum code using the hypergraph product, yielding a hypergraph product code. Here we show we can also lift the decoders for these classical codes. That is, given oracle access to a minimum weight decoder for the relevant classical codes, the corresponding $[[n,k,d]]$ quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than $(d-1)/2$ . The quantum decoder requires only $O(k)$ oracle calls to the classical decoder and $O(n^2)$ classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.The design of decoding algorithms is a significant technological component in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers. Often design of quantum decoders is inspired by classical decoding algorithms, but there are no general principles for building quantum decoders from classical decoders. Given any pair of classical codes, we can build a quantum code using the hypergraph product, yielding a hypergraph product code. Here we show we can also lift the decoders for these classical codes. That is, given oracle access to a minimum weight decoder for the relevant classical codes, the corresponding $[[n,k,d]]$ quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than $(d-1)/2$. The quantum decoder requires only $O(k)$ oracle calls to the classical decoder and $O(n^2)$ classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.

May 5, 20211 citation

The quantum decoder

Hafiz Md. Hasan Babu

Institute of Physics eBooksJun 1, 20230 citations

The Quantum Codebreaker

Taylor & Francis eBooksApr 8, 20130 citations

ReShape: A Decoder for Hypergraph Product Codes

Armanda O. Quintavalle, Earl T. Campbell

The design of decoding algorithms is a significant technological component in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers. Often design of quantum decoders is inspired by classical decoding algorithms, but there are no general principles for building quantum decoders from classical decoders. Given any pair of classical codes, we can build a quantum code using the hypergraph product, yielding a hypergraph product code. Here we show we can also lift the decoders for these classical codes. That is, given oracle access to a minimum weight decoder for the relevant classical codes, the corresponding $[[n,k,d]]$ quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than $(d-1)/2$ . The quantum decoder requires only $O(k)$ oracle calls to the classical decoder and $O(n^{2})$ classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, that is errors of weight up to half the code distance, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.The design of decoding algorithms is a significant technological component in the development of fault-tolerant quantum computers. Often design of quantum decoders is inspired by classical decoding algorithms, but there are no general principles for building quantum decoders from classical decoders. Given any pair of classical codes, we can build a quantum code using the hypergraph product, yielding a hypergraph product code. Here we show we can also lift the decoders for these classical codes. That is, given oracle access to a minimum weight decoder for the relevant classical codes, the corresponding$[[n,k,d]]$quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than$(d-1)/2$. The quantum decoder requires only$O(k)$oracle calls to the classical decoder and$O(n^{2})$classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, that is errors of weight up to half the code distance, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.

arXiv:2105.02370IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryJun 17, 202214 citations

Pseudocodeword-based Decoding of Quantum Color Codes

July X. Li, Joseph M. Renes, Pascal O. Vontobel

In previous work, we have shown that pseudocodewords can be used to characterize the behavior of decoders not only for classical codes but also for quantum stabilizer codes. With the insights obtained from this pseudocodewords-based analysis, we have also introduced a two-stage decoder based on pseudocodewords for quantum cycle codes that leads to improved decoding performance. In this paper, we consider quantum (stabilizer) color codes and propose a two-stage decoder that is a generalization of the pseudocodeword-based decoder for quantum cycle codes. Our decoder has local operations w.r.t. the underlying graphs, syndrome-weight-dependent computational complexity, and better decoding performance compared with previous approaches for quantum color codes.In previous work, we have shown that pseudocodewords can be used to characterize the behavior of decoders not only for classical codes but also for quantum stabilizer codes. With the insights obtained from this pseudocodewords-based analysis, we have also introduced a two-stage decoder based on pseudocodewords for quantum cycle codes that leads to improved decoding performance. In this paper, we consider quantum (stabilizer) color codes and propose a two-stage decoder that is a generalization of the pseudocodeword-based decoder for quantum cycle codes. Our decoder has local operations w.r.t. the underlying graphs, syndrome-weight-dependent computational complexity, and better decoding performance compared with previous approaches for quantum color codes.

arXiv:2010.10845IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)Jul 12, 20211 citation

Quantum encoding

George Jaroszkiewicz

Cambridge University Press eBooksApr 17, 20140 citations

[[n,k,d]]

quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than

(d-1)/2

. The quantum decoder requires only

O(k)

oracle calls to the classical decoder and

O(n^2)

classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.

[[n,k,d]]

quantum code can be efficiently decoded for any error of weight smaller than

(d-1)/2

. The quantum decoder requires only

O(k)

oracle calls to the classical decoder and

O(n^{2})

classical resources. The lift and the correctness proof of the decoder have a purely algebraic nature that draws on the discovery of some novel homological invariants of the hypergraph product codespace. While the decoder works perfectly for adversarial errors, that is errors of weight up to half the code distance, it is not suitable for more realistic stochastic noise models and therefore can not be used to establish an error correcting threshold.