Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

AIP conference proceedings

SOLID-STATE QUANTUM COMPUTING: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Solid-State Quantum Computing & Mini-School on Quantum Information Science

Hsi‐Sheng Goan, Yueh-Nan Chen

Published Dec 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Solid State Quantum Computation: Prospects, Proposals, and Prejudices

Bruce E. Kane

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Quantum Patterns and Types for Entanglement and Separability

Simon Perdrix

As a first step toward a notion of quantum data structures, we introduce a typing system for reflecting entanglement and separability. This is presented in the context of classically controlled quantum computation where a classical program controls a sequence of quantum operations, i.e. unitary transformations and measurements acting on a quantum memory. Abstract models for such quantum computations are the Quantum Random Access Machine (QRAM [E. Knill, Conventions for Quantum Pseudocode, LANL report LAUR-96-2724, 1996]) and the Classically-Controlled Quantum Turing Machine (CQTM [S. Perdrix, Ph. Jorrand, Classically-Controlled Quantum Computation, arXiv:quant-ph/0407008, to appear in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science]). Several quantum programming languages follow this model [S. Bettelli, T. Calarco, L. Serafini, Toward an architecture for quantum programming, Eur. Phys. J. D 25 (2) (2003) 181–200, S.J. Gay, R. Nagarajan, Communicating quantum processes, Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Jens Palsberg and Martin Abadi (Eds.), POPL 2005, January 12–14, 2005, pp. 145–157, M. Lalire, Ph. Jorrand, A process algebraic approach to concurrent and distributed quantum computation: operational semantics, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages, 2004, pp. 109–126, J.W. Sanders, P. Zuliani, Quantum Programming, Mathematics of Program Construction, Springer LNCS 1837, 80–99, 2000, P. Selinger, Towards a Quantum Programming Language, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 14 (4) (2004) 527–586]. Among them, the functional language defined by Valiron [B. Valiron, Quantum Typing, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages, 2004, pp. 163–178] is the basis for the language developed in this paper. This is work in progress.

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science•Mar 1, 2007•22 citations

Gaussian states are enough for universal and powerful quantum reservoir computing

Johannes Nokkala

Trabajo presentado en el 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Network Science (NetSci 2020 Satellite Workshop), celebrado el 18 de spetiembre de 2020.

•Sep 1, 2020•0 citations

Introduction to solid-state quantum computation for engineers

Joseph Ng, Derek Abbott

Microelectronics Journal•Jan 1, 2002•13 citations

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Post-Quantum Cryptography

Johannes A Buchmann, Jíntai Ding

•Oct 17, 2008•0 citations

Quantum Computing : Fundamentals of Solid State Realizations

David Peter Divincenzo, Lieven M. K. Vandersypen, Lars R. Schreiber +2 more

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations
As a first step toward a notion of quantum data structures, we introduce a typing system for reflecting entanglement and separability. This is presented in the context of classically controlled quantum computation where a classical program controls a sequence of quantum operations, i.e. unitary transformations and measurements acting on a quantum memory. Abstract models for such quantum computations are the Quantum Random Access Machine (QRAM [E. Knill, Conventions for Quantum Pseudocode, LANL report LAUR-96-2724, 1996]) and the Classically-Controlled Quantum Turing Machine (CQTM [S. Perdrix, Ph. Jorrand, Classically-Controlled Quantum Computation, arXiv:quant-ph/0407008, to appear in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science]). Several quantum programming languages follow this model [S. Bettelli, T. Calarco, L. Serafini, Toward an architecture for quantum programming, Eur. Phys. J. D 25 (2) (2003) 181–200, S.J. Gay, R. Nagarajan, Communicating quantum processes, Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Jens Palsberg and Martin Abadi (Eds.), POPL 2005, January 12–14, 2005, pp. 145–157, M. Lalire, Ph. Jorrand, A process algebraic approach to concurrent and distributed quantum computation: operational semantics, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages, 2004, pp. 109–126, J.W. Sanders, P. Zuliani, Quantum Programming, Mathematics of Program Construction, Springer LNCS 1837, 80–99, 2000, P. Selinger, Towards a Quantum Programming Language, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 14 (4) (2004) 527–586]. Among them, the functional language defined by Valiron [B. Valiron, Quantum Typing, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quantum Programming Languages, 2004, pp. 163–178] is the basis for the language developed in this paper. This is work in progress.