We numerically implement full quantum circuits of optimal tapered Quantum Phase Estimation (in the form of an implementable approximate bandwidth-limited DPSS taper) for the purpose of minimum eigenvalue computation, where the Hamiltonian time-evolution unitary is implemented using standard Trotterization, and the taper state is constructed using an optimized bandwidth-limited taper. We illustrate, on representative quantum Hamiltonians, with tractable exact classical numerical quantum circuit simulations, how tapered QPE performs with respect to optimal phase sampling rate, absolute error, Shannon entropy of the optimal phase distribution, when the tQPE algorithm parameters are changed. Those algorithm parameters are Trotter error, finite sampling, imperfect initial states, total evolution time, and digitization error (number of phase qubits). The reported numerical experiments include up to $\ell=10$ phase qubits of precision with $m=3$ additional phase-register error suppression qubits, on a $4$ -qubit Heisenberg quantum magnet model Hamiltonian, using up to 12th-order Trotterization. We numerically show i) the steady-state optimal phase sampling rate is determined by the initial state overlap with the ground-state, ii) with respect to phase sampling probability, or overall eigenvalue sampling error rate, there is no strong evolution time dependence for tQPE unless there is high Trotter error, iii) the approximated time-evolution unitaries in tQPE, like in standard QPE, can result in substantial ringing, which leads to non-physical eigenvalue estimates.We numerically implement full quantum circuits of optimal tapered Quantum Phase Estimation (in the form of an implementable approximate bandwidth-limited DPSS taper) for the purpose of minimum eigenvalue computation, where the Hamiltonian time-evolution unitary is implemented using standard Trotterization, and the taper state is constructed using an optimized bandwidth-limited taper. We illustrate, on representative quantum Hamiltonians, with tractable exact classical numerical quantum circuit simulations, how tapered QPE performs with respect to optimal phase sampling rate, absolute error, Shannon entropy of the optimal phase distribution, when the tQPE algorithm parameters are changed. Those algorithm parameters are Trotter error, finite sampling, imperfect initial states, total evolution time, and digitization error (number of phase qubits). The reported numerical experiments include up to $\ell=10$ phase qubits of precision with $m=3$ additional phase-register error suppression qubits, on a $4$-qubit Heisenberg quantum magnet model Hamiltonian, using up to 12th-order Trotterization. We numerically show i) the steady-state optimal phase sampling rate is determined by the initial state overlap with the ground-state, ii) with respect to phase sampling probability, or overall eigenvalue sampling error rate, there is no strong evolution time dependence for tQPE unless there is high Trotter error, iii) the approximated time-evolution unitaries in tQPE, like in standard QPE, can result in substantial ringing, which leads to non-physical eigenvalue estimates.

quant-pharXiv:2609.06249Sep 8, 20260 citations

Security of quantum key distribution with state-dependent imperfections

Hong-Wei Li, Zhen−Qiang Yin, Shuang Wang +3 more

In practical quantum key distribution system, the state preparation and measurement have state-dependent imperfections comparing with the ideal BB84 protocol. If the state-dependent imperfection can not be regarded as an unitary transformation, it should not be considered as part of quantum channel noise introduced by the eavesdropper, the commonly used secret key rate formula GLLP can not be applied correspondingly. In this paper, the unconditional security of quantum key distribution with state-dependent imperfections will be analyzed by estimating upper bound of the phase error rate in the quantum channel and the imperfect measurement. Interestingly, since Eve can not control all phase error in the quantum key distribution system, the final secret key rate under constant quantum bit error rate can be improved comparing with the perfect quantum key distribution protocol.In practical quantum key distribution system, the state preparation and measurement have state-dependent imperfections comparing with the ideal BB84 protocol. If the state-dependent imperfection can not be regarded as an unitary transformation, it should not be considered as part of quantum channel noise introduced by the eavesdropper, the commonly used secret key rate formula GLLP can not be applied correspondingly. In this paper, the unconditional security of quantum key distribution with state-dependent imperfections will be analyzed by estimating upper bound of the phase error rate in the quantum channel and the imperfect measurement. Interestingly, since Eve can not control all phase error in the quantum key distribution system, the final secret key rate under constant quantum bit error rate can be improved comparing with the perfect quantum key distribution protocol.

arXiv:1009.1047Quantum Information and ComputationNov 1, 20113 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooksJan 1, 20226 citations

Quantum Phase Estimation

Hiu Yung Wong

Springer eBooksJun 21, 20230 citations

\ell=10

phase qubits of precision with

m=3

additional phase-register error suppression qubits, on a

4

-qubit Heisenberg quantum magnet model Hamiltonian, using up to 12th-order Trotterization. We numerically show i) the steady-state optimal phase sampling rate is determined by the initial state overlap with the ground-state, ii) with respect to phase sampling probability, or overall eigenvalue sampling error rate, there is no strong evolution time dependence for tQPE unless there is high Trotter error, iii) the approximated time-evolution unitaries in tQPE, like in standard QPE, can result in substantial ringing, which leads to non-physical eigenvalue estimates.