Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

a Bayesian Approach to Quantum State Determination

Phillip R. Dukes

Published Jan 1, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

A Quantum-Bayesian Route to Quantum-State Space

Christopher A. Fuchs, Rüdiger Schack

arXiv:0912.4252•Foundations of Physics•Jan 7, 2010•101 citations

Shot-by-shot estimation of quantum measurement accuracy via quantum Bayesian inference

Sergey V. Polyakov, Ivan A. Burenkov, M. V. Jabir +2 more

Ordinarily, quantum-measurement based state discrimination methods use Bayesian inference to determine the maximally likely optical input state out of N possible inputs. Each practical single-shot measurement yields a unique vector of N likelihood values (one per each possible outcome) whose significance is not appreciated. Here we show theoretically and experimentally that measured Bayesian likelihood values are equal to observed probabilities of a successful state discrimination. Thus, the vector of Bayesian likelihoods provides significantly more information about the input state than is available in a typical state discrimination measurement.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology•Mar 4, 2021•0 citations

Operational time-reversal symmetry for unital qubit channels

Ouyang Ting, James Fullwood, Zhen Wu

The Bayesian inverse of a quantum channel $\mathcal{E}$ is a channel $\mathcal{F}$ in the reverse direction of $\mathcal{E}$ that yields time-symmetric correlations for sequential measurements performed on open quantum systems. Such an operational form of time-reversal symmetry for open quantum systems is quite remarkable, as the dynamics of open quantum systems are inherently irreversible due to system-environment interactions. Similar to the Petz map, a Bayesian inverse $\mathcal{F}$ is defined with respect to a fiducial reference state $ρ$ for the channel $\mathcal{E}$. However, Bayesian inverses do not always exist, and it is often a non-trivial task to determine the set of states $ρ$ for which a Bayesian inverse of $\mathcal{E}$ exists. In this work, we solve the general problem of quantum Bayesian inversion for unital channels acting on a single qubit. Our analysis is streamlined by demonstrating that finding a Bayesian inverse for a unital qubit channel may be reduced to finding a Bayesian inverse of a Pauli channel, which is simply a mixture of unitary channels associated with the Pauli matrices. As such, we provide a complete description of when operational time-reversal symmetry is attainable for sequential measurements of a single qubit in the presence of unital noise.

quant-pharXiv:2605.10375•May 12, 2026•0 citations

Bayesian inference in quantum systems

Dorje C. Brody, Bernhard K. Meister

Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Jan 1, 1996•7 citations

Quantum state estimation when qubits are lost: a no-data-left-behind approach

Brian P. Williams, Pavel Lougovski

We present an approach to Bayesian mean estimation of quantum states using hyperspherical parametrization and an experiment-specific likelihood which allows utilization of all available data, even when qubits are lost. With this method, we report the first closed-form Bayesian mean estimate (BME) for the ideal single qubit. Due to computational constraints, we utilize numerical sampling to determine the BME for a photonic two-qubit experiment in which our novel analysis reduces burdens associated with experimental asymmetries and inefficiencies. This method can be applied to quantum states of any dimension and experimental complexity.

arXiv:1610.03714•New Journal of Physics•Apr 6, 2017•23 citations

Bayesian quantum mechanics

Paul B. Slater

Nature•Jan 27, 1994•7 citations
Ordinarily, quantum-measurement based state discrimination methods use Bayesian inference to determine the maximally likely optical input state out of N possible inputs. Each practical single-shot measurement yields a unique vector of N likelihood values (one per each possible outcome) whose significance is not appreciated. Here we show theoretically and experimentally that measured Bayesian likelihood values are equal to observed probabilities of a successful state discrimination. Thus, the vector of Bayesian likelihoods provides significantly more information about the input state than is available in a typical state discrimination measurement.
The Bayesian inverse of a quantum channel E\mathcal{E}E is a channel F\mathcal{F}F in the reverse direction of E\mathcal{E}E that yields time-symmetric correlations for sequential measurements performed on open quantum systems. Such an operational form of time-reversal symmetry for open quantum systems is quite remarkable, as the dynamics of open quantum systems are inherently irreversible due to system-environment interactions. Similar to the Petz map, a Bayesian inverse F\mathcal{F}F is defined with respect to a fiducial reference state ρρρ for the channel E\mathcal{E}E. However, Bayesian inverses do not always exist, and it is often a non-trivial task to determine the set of states ρρρ for which a Bayesian inverse of E\mathcal{E}E exists. In this work, we solve the general problem of quantum Bayesian inversion for unital channels acting on a single qubit. Our analysis is streamlined by demonstrating that finding a Bayesian inverse for a unital qubit channel may be reduced to finding a Bayesian inverse of a Pauli channel, which is simply a mixture of unitary channels associated with the Pauli matrices. As such, we provide a complete description of when operational time-reversal symmetry is attainable for sequential measurements of a single qubit in the presence of unital noise.
We present an approach to Bayesian mean estimation of quantum states using hyperspherical parametrization and an experiment-specific likelihood which allows utilization of all available data, even when qubits are lost. With this method, we report the first closed-form Bayesian mean estimate (BME) for the ideal single qubit. Due to computational constraints, we utilize numerical sampling to determine the BME for a photonic two-qubit experiment in which our novel analysis reduces burdens associated with experimental asymmetries and inefficiencies. This method can be applied to quantum states of any dimension and experimental complexity.