Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Geometric approach to fragile topological phases

Adrien Bouhon, Tomáš Bzdušek, Robert-Jan Slager

Published May 5, 2020• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Fragility of time-reversal symmetry protected topological phases

Max McGinley, Nigel R. Cooper

arXiv:2003.08120•Nature Physics•Jul 6, 2020•47 citations

Geometric and topological phases

David S. Simon

Institute of Physics eBooks•May 1, 2021•0 citations

Fragile topological phases in interacting systems

Dominic V. Else, Hoi Chun Po, Haruki Watanabe

Topological phases of matter are defined by their nontrivial patterns of ground-state quantum entanglement, which is irremovable so long as the excitation gap and the protecting symmetries, if any, are maintained. Recent studies on noninteracting electrons in crystals have unveiled a peculiar variety of topological phases, which harbor nontrivial entanglement that can be dissolved simply by the the addition of entanglement-free, but charged, degrees of freedom. Such topological phases have a weaker sense of robustness than their conventional counterparts, and are therefore dubbed ``fragile topological phases.'' In this work, we show that fragile topology is a general concept prevailing beyond systems of noninteracting electrons. Fragile topological phases can generally occur when a system has a $\mathrm{U}(1)$ charge conservation symmetry, such that only particles with one sign of the charge are physically allowed (e.g., electrons but not positrons). We demonstrate that fragile topological phases exist in interacting systems of both fermions and of bosons.

arXiv:1809.02128•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 15, 2019•48 citations

Disconnected elementary band representations, fragile topology, and Wilson loops as topological indices: An example on the triangular lattice

Barry Bradlyn, Zhijun Wang, Jennifer Cano +1 more

Like all topologically nontrivial bands, the recently discovered fragile topological states cannot be described with symmetric localized basis functions. Unlike the well-understood ``stable'' topological phases, fragile ones have a localized description in the presence of additional trivial orbitals. Here, the authors explore the properties of fragile topological bands, focusing on a family of models on a triangular lattice. The authors show how nonabelian Berry phases can be used to diagnose fragile topology. They also explore how fragile topology manifests itself in the entanglement spectrum.

arXiv:1807.09729•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 25, 2019•142 citations

Space–time geometry of topological phases

F.J. Burnell, Steven H. Simon

arXiv:1004.5586•Annals of Physics•Jun 20, 2010•62 citations

Topological phases in one dimension

Antônio Sérgio Teixeira Pires

Institute of Physics eBooks•Nov 1, 2021•0 citations
Topological phases of matter are defined by their nontrivial patterns of ground-state quantum entanglement, which is irremovable so long as the excitation gap and the protecting symmetries, if any, are maintained. Recent studies on noninteracting electrons in crystals have unveiled a peculiar variety of topological phases, which harbor nontrivial entanglement that can be dissolved simply by the the addition of entanglement-free, but charged, degrees of freedom. Such topological phases have a weaker sense of robustness than their conventional counterparts, and are therefore dubbed ``fragile topological phases.'' In this work, we show that fragile topology is a general concept prevailing beyond systems of noninteracting electrons. Fragile topological phases can generally occur when a system has a U(1)\mathrm{U}(1)U(1) charge conservation symmetry, such that only particles with one sign of the charge are physically allowed (e.g., electrons but not positrons). We demonstrate that fragile topological phases exist in interacting systems of both fermions and of bosons.
Like all topologically nontrivial bands, the recently discovered fragile topological states cannot be described with symmetric localized basis functions. Unlike the well-understood ``stable'' topological phases, fragile ones have a localized description in the presence of additional trivial orbitals. Here, the authors explore the properties of fragile topological bands, focusing on a family of models on a triangular lattice. The authors show how nonabelian Berry phases can be used to diagnose fragile topology. They also explore how fragile topology manifests itself in the entanglement spectrum.