Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics

One-photon decay of two-hole states in atoms

M. Ya. Amus’ya, I. S. Li

Published Aug 1, 1977• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Single photon decay of double hole states in atoms

M. Ya. Amusia, I.S. Lee, A. N. Zinoviev

Physics Letters A•Mar 1, 1977•13 citations

One-Photon Decay of Single- and Double-Hole States

M. Ya. Amusia, Larissa V. Chernysheva

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics•Jan 1, 2021•1 citation

Two-electron one-photon decay rates in doubly ionised atoms. II

G.B. Baptista

Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics•Jan 28, 1986•7 citations

Suppression of hole decoherence in ultrafast photoionization

Antonia Karamatskou, R. Esteban Goetz, Christiane P. Koch +1 more

In simple one-photon ionization, decoherence occurs due to entanglement between ion and photoelectron. Therefore, the preparation of coherent superpositions of electronic eigenstates of the hole in the photoion is extremely difficult. We demonstrate for the xenon atom that the degree of electronic coherence of the photoion in attosecond photoionization can be enhanced if the influence of many-body interactions is properly controlled. A mechanism at low photon energies involving multiphoton ionization is found, suppressing the loss of coherence through ionization into the same photoelectron partial waves. The degree of coherence found between the $4{d}_{0}$ and $5s$ hole states is, on the one hand, limited by Auger decay of the $4{d}_{0}$ hole. On the other hand, increasing the population ratio such that a significant portion of the state is in a true superposition of both states renders the maximization of the degree of coherence difficult.

Physical Review A•Apr 13, 2020•4 citations

Shift of holes in spectral lines due to time dependent perturbation

R. P. Srivastava

The radiative decay of an atom with two excited states, one decaying and the other non-decaying, coupled by a time dependent perturbation, is investigated. The hole in the emission line is found to be shifted by an amount equal to the frequency of the time dependent perturbation. The practical importance of this effect is discussed. It is also noticed that the two methods of solution, one by making the rotating-wave approximation and the other by a perturbation expansion, yield different results, especially in the case when the two excited states are strongly coupled.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Dec 15, 1976•1 citation

Two-photon decay of highly excited states

Viktor K. Dubrovich

Optics and Spectroscopy•Aug 1, 1987•1 citation
In simple one-photon ionization, decoherence occurs due to entanglement between ion and photoelectron. Therefore, the preparation of coherent superpositions of electronic eigenstates of the hole in the photoion is extremely difficult. We demonstrate for the xenon atom that the degree of electronic coherence of the photoion in attosecond photoionization can be enhanced if the influence of many-body interactions is properly controlled. A mechanism at low photon energies involving multiphoton ionization is found, suppressing the loss of coherence through ionization into the same photoelectron partial waves. The degree of coherence found between the 4d04{d}_{0}4d0​ and 5s5s5s hole states is, on the one hand, limited by Auger decay of the 4d04{d}_{0}4d0​ hole. On the other hand, increasing the population ratio such that a significant portion of the state is in a true superposition of both states renders the maximization of the degree of coherence difficult.
The radiative decay of an atom with two excited states, one decaying and the other non-decaying, coupled by a time dependent perturbation, is investigated. The hole in the emission line is found to be shifted by an amount equal to the frequency of the time dependent perturbation. The practical importance of this effect is discussed. It is also noticed that the two methods of solution, one by making the rotating-wave approximation and the other by a perturbation expansion, yield different results, especially in the case when the two excited states are strongly coupled.