Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Europhysics Letters (EPL)

Madelung transformation of the quantum bouncer problem

Eyal Heifetz, I. Plochotnikov

Published Apr 30, 2020• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The "quantum bouncer" problem of a quantum particle in a gravitational field, bouncing elastically from a horizontal surface, is mapped via the Madelung transformation into the dynamics of a 1D, compressible, inviscid fluid. Under this transformation the energy states of the quantum bouncer, given in terms of the Airy function, are hydrostatic equilibria states where gravity is balanced by the corresponding vertical pressure gradient force exerted by the fluid. The stability of the hydrostatic states, with respect to small perturbations, is expressed in terms of the positive definite pseudoenergy integral derived here. Pseudoenergy, which is a constant of motion of the linearized perturbation dynamics, is in this case the sum of the perturbation kinetic and available potential energies. The latter is found to be proportional to the square of the vertical derivative of the buoyancy perturbation rather than the square of the buoyancy itself, as is generally the case in classical fluids. For sinusoidal perturbations with vertical wavenumber k , the effective frequency of the buoyancy oscillation is found to be , which is twice the ratio between the gravitational force and the momentum of a free quantum particle.

DOI
10.1209/0295-5075/130/10002

Related papers

The quantum bouncer by the path integral method

D. A. Goodings, T. Szeredi

The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics in the semiclassical or WKB approximation provides a physically intuitive way of relating a classical system to its quantum analog. A fruitful way of studying quantum chaos is based upon applying the Gutzwiller periodic orbit sum rule, a result derived by the path integral method in the WKB approximation. This provides some motivation for learning about path integral techniques. In this paper a pedagogical example of the path integral formalism is presented in the hope of conveying the basic physical and mathematical concepts. The ‘‘quantum bouncer’’ is studied—the quantum version of a particle moving in one dimension above a perfectly reflecting surface while subject to a constant force directed toward the surface. The classical counterpart of this system is a ball bouncing on a floor in a constant gravitational field, collisions with the floor being assumed to be elastic. Path integration is used to derive the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the quantum bouncer in the WKB or semiclassical approximation. The results are shown to be the same as those obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in the same approximation.

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1991•25 citations

Quantum bouncer on a spring

John Lekner, Huyen Nguyen

The usual 'quantum bouncer' is a quantum particle bouncing elastically under the influence of gravity. Here we consider a particle bouncing off an impenetrable wall, and bound to it by the harmonic potential instead of by the gravitational potential mgx . An analytic solution is possible, easily accessible to classes in intermediate quantum mechanics. The solution is related to Schrödinger's oscillating wavepacket (the original coherent state ). Although periodic, it changes its form during the oscillation, in contrast to Schrödinger's packet. The uncertainties in the position (Δ x ) and the momentum (Δ p ) oscillate also, as does the product Δ x Δ p .

European Journal of Physics•Jul 13, 2009•7 citations

Coherent-state analysis of the quantum bouncing ball

William Mather, Ronald F. Fox

Gaussian-Klauder coherent states are applied to the bound ``quantum bouncer,'' a gravitating particle above an infinite potential boundary. These Gaussian-Klauder states, originally created for Rydberg atoms, provide an overcomplete set of wave functions that mimic classical trajectories for extended times through the utilization of energy localization. For the quantum bouncer, analytic methods are applied presently to compute first and second moments of position and momentum operators, and from these results, at least two scalings of Gaussian-Klauder parameters are highlighted, one of which tends to remains localized for markedly more bounces than comparable states that are Gaussian in position (by an order of magnitude in some cases). We close with a connection that compares Gaussian-Klauder states and positional Gaussian states directly for the quantum bouncer, relating the two through a known energy-position duality of Airy functions. Our results, taken together, ultimately reemphasize the primacy of energy localization as a key ingredient for long-lived classical correspondence in systems with smooth spectra.

Physical Review A•Mar 23, 2006•17 citations

Quantum bouncer with quadratic dissipation

Gabriel González

The energy loss due to a quadratic velocity dependent force on a quantum particle bouncing on a perfectly reflecting surface is obtained for a full cycle of motion. We approach this problem by means of a new effective phenomenological Hamiltonian which corresponds to the actual energy of the system and obtained the correction to the eigenvalues of the energy in first order quantum perturbation theory for the case of weak dissipation.

arXiv:0802.2246•Revista Mexicana de Física•Feb 15, 2008•3 citations

Theoretical Note: Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from the Chronodynamic Euler State

Ambiel da Silva, Marcelo

In the framework of Chronodynamic Cosmology (CDC), the vacuum is defined as a physical superfluid (Psi). If this premise is correct, the fundamental equations of Quantum Mechanics must be derivable from Hydrodynamics. In this note, we perform the Madelung Transformation to demonstrate that the Schrödinger Equation is mathematically equivalent to the Euler Equation for an inviscid, compressible fluid subjected to a specific internal pressure potential. This derivation suggests that "Quantum Potential" (Q) is the hydrostatic pressure of the Time-Fluid, and that "Wavefunction Collapse" is a phase transition from an inviscid (superfluid) state to a viscous (classical) state.

•Nov 25, 2025•0 citations

On observation of neutron quantum states in the Earth’s gravitational field

Anatoli Vankov

Observation of neutron gravitational quantum states ${E}_{n}=mg{z}_{n}$ in the peV energy range (${z}_{1}$ is about $10\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ in the vertical direction) in the experiment conducted at Laue-Langevin Institute, Grenoble, with ultracold neutrons was recently reported in a series of publications. The purpose of the present work is to analyze the experiment. The experimental apparatus is designed to measure a transmission function $T({z}_{a})$, namely, a horizontal flux of relatively fast neutrons ($k\ensuremath{\gg}{k}_{z}$ in wavelength terms) passing through a slit of variable height ${z}_{a}$ of upper absorbing wall. The quantum states in question are defined by the so-called Airy functions, which are solutions to the stationary 1D equation for a neutron ``bouncing'' above the perfect mirror in a linear potential field. The Airy functions describe the quantum bouncer (QB), the concept of which is subject to theoretical study of toy 1D models of gravitationally bound particles in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM). This is essentially different from the 3D nonstationary QM object, ``the running QB,'' investigated in the experiment. The authors assume that there is a connection between $T({z}_{a})$ and the probability density distribution $P(z,{z}_{a})$ for QB states. They devised the ``phenomenological model,'' in which the quantum pattern should be visible in the transmission curve. We argue, however, that the measured curve $T({z}_{a})$ is not sensitive to QB states. Instead, it is sensitive to dynamics of neutron horizontal transport inside the absorbing slit for neutrons of energy values about ${10}^{5}$ times greater than eigenvalues ${E}_{n}$. The latter are related to the neutron transverse mode ${k}_{z}$ and cannot be termed ``energies of neutron gravitational quantum states.'' We conclude that the experiment setup and real conditions are not adequate to the claimed objective, and the methodology of measured data treatment is flawed. The authors' claim that ``neutron gravitational quantum states are observed'' is neither theoretically nor experimentally substantiated. Final, statistically significant results of the experiment are consistent with our physical reasoning that the experiment is not sensitive to ``neutron gravitational quantum states'' (in terms of Airy mode) and does not prove even their existence in rigorous quantum-mechanical terms.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Mar 24, 2010•1 citation
The "quantum bouncer" problem of a quantum particle in a gravitational field, bouncing elastically from a horizontal surface, is mapped via the Madelung transformation into the dynamics of a 1D, compressible, inviscid fluid. Under this transformation the energy states of the quantum bouncer, given in terms of the Airy function, are hydrostatic equilibria states where gravity is balanced by the corresponding vertical pressure gradient force exerted by the fluid. The stability of the hydrostatic states, with respect to small perturbations, is expressed in terms of the positive definite pseudoenergy integral derived here. Pseudoenergy, which is a constant of motion of the linearized perturbation dynamics, is in this case the sum of the perturbation kinetic and available potential energies. The latter is found to be proportional to the square of the vertical derivative of the buoyancy perturbation rather than the square of the buoyancy itself, as is generally the case in classical fluids. For sinusoidal perturbations with vertical wavenumber k , the effective frequency of the buoyancy oscillation is found to be , which is twice the ratio between the gravitational force and the momentum of a free quantum particle.
The path integral formulation of quantum mechanics in the semiclassical or WKB approximation provides a physically intuitive way of relating a classical system to its quantum analog. A fruitful way of studying quantum chaos is based upon applying the Gutzwiller periodic orbit sum rule, a result derived by the path integral method in the WKB approximation. This provides some motivation for learning about path integral techniques. In this paper a pedagogical example of the path integral formalism is presented in the hope of conveying the basic physical and mathematical concepts. The ‘‘quantum bouncer’’ is studied—the quantum version of a particle moving in one dimension above a perfectly reflecting surface while subject to a constant force directed toward the surface. The classical counterpart of this system is a ball bouncing on a floor in a constant gravitational field, collisions with the floor being assumed to be elastic. Path integration is used to derive the energy eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the quantum bouncer in the WKB or semiclassical approximation. The results are shown to be the same as those obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in the same approximation.
The usual 'quantum bouncer' is a quantum particle bouncing elastically under the influence of gravity. Here we consider a particle bouncing off an impenetrable wall, and bound to it by the harmonic potential instead of by the gravitational potential mgx . An analytic solution is possible, easily accessible to classes in intermediate quantum mechanics. The solution is related to Schrödinger's oscillating wavepacket (the original coherent state ). Although periodic, it changes its form during the oscillation, in contrast to Schrödinger's packet. The uncertainties in the position (Δ x ) and the momentum (Δ p ) oscillate also, as does the product Δ x Δ p .
Gaussian-Klauder coherent states are applied to the bound ``quantum bouncer,'' a gravitating particle above an infinite potential boundary. These Gaussian-Klauder states, originally created for Rydberg atoms, provide an overcomplete set of wave functions that mimic classical trajectories for extended times through the utilization of energy localization. For the quantum bouncer, analytic methods are applied presently to compute first and second moments of position and momentum operators, and from these results, at least two scalings of Gaussian-Klauder parameters are highlighted, one of which tends to remains localized for markedly more bounces than comparable states that are Gaussian in position (by an order of magnitude in some cases). We close with a connection that compares Gaussian-Klauder states and positional Gaussian states directly for the quantum bouncer, relating the two through a known energy-position duality of Airy functions. Our results, taken together, ultimately reemphasize the primacy of energy localization as a key ingredient for long-lived classical correspondence in systems with smooth spectra.
In the framework of Chronodynamic Cosmology (CDC), the vacuum is defined as a physical superfluid (Psi). If this premise is correct, the fundamental equations of Quantum Mechanics must be derivable from Hydrodynamics. In this note, we perform the Madelung Transformation to demonstrate that the Schrödinger Equation is mathematically equivalent to the Euler Equation for an inviscid, compressible fluid subjected to a specific internal pressure potential. This derivation suggests that "Quantum Potential" (Q) is the hydrostatic pressure of the Time-Fluid, and that "Wavefunction Collapse" is a phase transition from an inviscid (superfluid) state to a viscous (classical) state.
Observation of neutron gravitational quantum states En=mgzn{E}_{n}=mg{z}_{n}En​=mgzn​ in the peV energy range (z1{z}_{1}z1​ is about $10\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ in the vertical direction) in the experiment conducted at Laue-Langevin Institute, Grenoble, with ultracold neutrons was recently reported in a series of publications. The purpose of the present work is to analyze the experiment. The experimental apparatus is designed to measure a transmission function T(za)T({z}_{a})T(za​), namely, a horizontal flux of relatively fast neutrons ($k\ensuremath{\gg}{k}_{z}$ in wavelength terms) passing through a slit of variable height za{z}_{a}za​ of upper absorbing wall. The quantum states in question are defined by the so-called Airy functions, which are solutions to the stationary 1D equation for a neutron ``bouncing'' above the perfect mirror in a linear potential field. The Airy functions describe the quantum bouncer (QB), the concept of which is subject to theoretical study of toy 1D models of gravitationally bound particles in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM). This is essentially different from the 3D nonstationary QM object, ``the running QB,'' investigated in the experiment. The authors assume that there is a connection between T(za)T({z}_{a})T(za​) and the probability density distribution P(z,za)P(z,{z}_{a})P(z,za​) for QB states. They devised the ``phenomenological model,'' in which the quantum pattern should be visible in the transmission curve. We argue, however, that the measured curve T(za)T({z}_{a})T(za​) is not sensitive to QB states. Instead, it is sensitive to dynamics of neutron horizontal transport inside the absorbing slit for neutrons of energy values about 105{10}^{5}105 times greater than eigenvalues En{E}_{n}En​. The latter are related to the neutron transverse mode kz{k}_{z}kz​ and cannot be termed ``energies of neutron gravitational quantum states.'' We conclude that the experiment setup and real conditions are not adequate to the claimed objective, and the methodology of measured data treatment is flawed. The authors' claim that ``neutron gravitational quantum states are observed'' is neither theoretically nor experimentally substantiated. Final, statistically significant results of the experiment are consistent with our physical reasoning that the experiment is not sensitive to ``neutron gravitational quantum states'' (in terms of Airy mode) and does not prove even their existence in rigorous quantum-mechanical terms.