The problem of finding maximum (or minimum) witnesses of the Boolean product of two Boolean matrices (MW for short) has a number of important applications, in particular the all-pairs lowest common ancestor (LCA) problem in directed acyclic graphs (dags). The best known upper time-bound on the MW problem for [Formula: see text] Boolean matrices of the form [Formula: see text] has not been substantially improved since 2006. In order to obtain faster algorithms for this problem, we study quantum algorithms for MW and approximation algorithms for MW (in the classical computational model). Some of our quantum algorithms are input or output sensitive. Our fastest quantum algorithm for the MW problem, and consequently for the related problems, runs in time [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] satisfies the equation [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is the exponent of the multiplication of an [Formula: see text] matrix by an [Formula: see text] matrix. Next, we consider a relaxed version of the MW problem (in the classical model) asking for reporting a witness of bounded rank (the maximum witness has rank 1) for each non-zero entry of the matrix product. First, by adapting the fastest known algorithm for maximum witnesses, we obtain an algorithm for the relaxed problem that reports for each non-zero entry of the product matrix a witness of rank at most [Formula: see text] in time [Formula: see text] Then, by reducing the relaxed problem to the so called [Formula: see text]-witness problem, we provide an algorithm that reports for each non-zero entry [Formula: see text] of the product matrix [Formula: see text] a witness of rank [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of witnesses for [Formula: see text], with high probability. The algorithm runs in [Formula: see text] time, where [Formula: see text].
The problem of finding maximum (or minimum) witnesses of the Boolean product of two Boolean matrices (MW for short) has a number of important applications, in particular the all-pairs lowest common ancestor (LCA) problem in directed acyclic graphs (dags). The best known upper time-bound on the MW problem for [Formula: see text] Boolean matrices of the form [Formula: see text] has not been substantially improved since 2006. In order to obtain faster algorithms for this problem, we study quantum algorithms for MW and approximation algorithms for MW (in the classical computational model). Some of our quantum algorithms are input or output sensitive. Our fastest quantum algorithm for the MW problem, and consequently for the related problems, runs in time [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] satisfies the equation [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is the exponent of the multiplication of an [Formula: see text] matrix by an [Formula: see text] matrix. Next, we consider a relaxed version of the MW problem (in the classical model) asking for reporting a witness of bounded rank (the maximum witness has rank 1) for each non-zero entry of the matrix product. First, by adapting the fastest known algorithm for maximum witnesses, we obtain an algorithm for the relaxed problem that reports for each non-zero entry of the product matrix a witness of rank at most [Formula: see text] in time [Formula: see text] Then, by reducing the relaxed problem to the so called [Formula: see text]-witness problem, we provide an algorithm that reports for each non-zero entry [Formula: see text] of the product matrix [Formula: see text] a witness of rank [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the number of witnesses for [Formula: see text], with high probability. The algorithm runs in [Formula: see text] time, where [Formula: see text].
The problem of finding maximum (or minimum) witnesses of the Boolean product of two Boolean matrices (MW for short) has a number of important applications, in particular the all-pairs lowest common ancestor (LCA) problem in directed acyclic graphs (dags). The best known upper time-bound on the MW problem for n\times n Boolean matrices of the form O(n^{2.575}) has not been substantially improved since 2006. In order to obtain faster algorithms for this problem, we study quantum algorithms for MW and approximation algorithms for MW (in the standard computational model). Some of our quantum algorithms are input or output sensitive. Our fastest quantum algorithm for the MW problem, and consequently for the related problems, runs in time \tilde{O}(n^{2+λ/2})=\tilde{O}(n^{2.434}), where λsatisfies the equation ω(1, λ, 1) = 1 + 1.5 \, λand ω(1, λ, 1) is the exponent of the multiplication of an n \times n^λ$ matrix by an n^λ \times n matrix. Next, we consider a relaxed version of the MW problem (in the standard model) asking for reporting a witness of bounded rank (the maximum witness has rank 1) for each non-zero entry of the matrix product. First, by adapting the fastest known algorithm for maximum witnesses, we obtain an algorithm for the relaxed problem that reports for each non-zero entry of the product matrix a witness of rank at most \ell in time \tilde{O}((n/\ell)n^{ω(1,\log_n \ell,1)}). Then, by reducing the relaxed problem to the so called k-witness problem, we provide an algorithm that reports for each non-zero entry C[i,j] of the product matrix C a witness of rank O(\lceil W_C(i,j)/k\rceil ), where W_C(i,j) is the number of witnesses for C[i,j], with high probability. The algorithm runs in \tilde{O}(n^ωk^{0.4653} +n^2k) time, where ω=ω(1,1,1).
We present new quantum algorithms for Boolean Matrix Multiplication in both the time complexity and the query complexity settings. As far as time complexity is concerned, our results show that the product of two n × n Boolean matrices can be computed on a quantum computer in time Õ(n 3/2 + nℓ 3/4), where ℓ is the number of non-zero entries in the product, improving over the output-sensitive quantum algorithm by Buhrman and ˇ Spalek that runs in Õ(n3/2√ℓ) time. This is done by constructing a quantum version of a recent algorithm by Lingas, using quantum techniques such as quantum counting to exploit the sparsity of the output matrix. As far as query complexity is concerned, our results improve over the quantum algorithm by Vassilevska Williams and Williams based on a reduction to the triangle finding problem. One of the main contributions leading to this improvement is the construction of a triangle finding quantum algorithm tailored especially for the tripartite graphs appearing in the reduction. 1
We present new quantum algorithms for Boolean Matrix Multiplication in both the time complexity and the query complexity settings. As far as time complexity is concerned, our results show that the product of two n × n Boolean matrices can be computed on a quantum computer in time Õ (n3/2 + nℓ3/4), where ℓ is the number of non-zero entries in the product, improving over the output-sensitive quantum algorithm by Buhrman and Spalek that runs in Õ(n3/2 √ℓ) time. This is done by constructing a quantum version of a recent algorithm by Lingas, using quantum techniques such as quantum counting to exploit the sparsity of the output matrix. As far as query complexity is concerned, our results improve over the quantum algorithm by Vassilevska Williams and Williams based on a reduction to the triangle finding problem. One of the main contributions leading to this improvement is the construction of a triangle finding quantum algorithm tailored especially for the tripartite graphs appearing in the reduction.
In this paper we construct quantum algorithms for matrix products over several algebraic structures called semirings, including the (max, min)-matrix product, the distance matrix product and the Boolean matrix product.In particular, we obtain the following results.• We construct a quantum algorithm computing the product of two n × n matrices over the (max, min) semiring with time complexity O(n 2.473 ).In comparison, the best known classical algorithm for the same problem, by Duan and Pettie (SODA'09), has complexity O(n 2.687 ).• We construct a quantum algorithm computing the ℓ most significant bits of each entry of the distance product of two n × n matrices in time O(2 0.64ℓ n 2.46 ).In comparison, the best known classical algorithm for the same problem, by Vassilevska and Williams (STOC'06) and Yuster (SODA'09), has complexity O(2 ℓ n 2.69 ).The above two algorithms are the first quantum algorithms that perform better than the Õ(n 5/2 )-time straightforward quantum algorithm based on quantum search for matrix multiplication over these semirings.We also consider the Boolean semiring, and construct a quantum algorithm computing the product of two n × n Boolean matrices that outperforms the best known classical algorithms for sparse matrices.
Abstract. We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems—including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering—existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms with at most a constant factor loss. For example, for almost all fixed matrices [Formula: see text], including the discrete Fourier transform matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most [Formula: see text] input queries and [Formula: see text] qubits of memory require [Formula: see text] to compute matrix-vector product [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text]. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for [Formula: see text] binary matrices requires [Formula: see text]. Because many of our lower bounds are matched by deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, our results show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity—the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e., AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for [Formula: see text] Boolean matrix multiplication to [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text]. Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem that was the basis for prior work. To obtain our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems, we require much stronger bounds than strong direct product theorems. We obtain these bounds by adding a new bucketing method to the quantum recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.
We present a study of extremal entanglement witnesses on a bipartite composite quantum system. We define the cone of witnesses as the dual of the set of separable density matrices, thus [Formula: see text] when [Formula: see text] is a witness and [Formula: see text] is a pure product state, [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The set of witnesses of unit trace is a compact convex set, uniquely defined by its extremal points. The expectation value [Formula: see text] as a function of vectors [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] is a positive semidefinite biquadratic form. Every zero of [Formula: see text] imposes strong real-linear constraints on f and [Formula: see text]. The real and symmetric Hessian matrix at the zero must be positive semidefinite. Its eigenvectors with zero eigenvalue, if such exist, we call Hessian zeros. A zero of [Formula: see text] is quadratic if it has no Hessian zeros, otherwise it is quartic. We call a witness quadratic if it has only quadratic zeros, and quartic if it has at least one quartic zero. A main result we prove is that a witness is extremal if and only if no other witness has the same, or a larger, set of zeros and Hessian zeros. A quadratic extremal witness has a minimum number of isolated zeros depending on dimensions. If a witness is not extremal, then the constraints defined by its zeros and Hessian zeros determine all directions in which we may search for witnesses having more zeros or Hessian zeros. A finite number of iterated searches in random directions, by numerical methods, leads to an extremal witness which is nearly always quadratic and has the minimum number of zeros. We discuss briefly some topics related to extremal witnesses, in particular the relation between the facial structures of the dual sets of witnesses and separable states. We discuss the relation between extremality and optimality of witnesses, and a conjecture of separability of the so-called structural physical approximation (SPA) of an optimal witness. Finally, we discuss how to treat the entanglement witnesses on a complex Hilbert space as a subset of the witnesses on a real Hilbert space.