Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optics and Photonics News

Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics, by Stephen M. Barnett and Paul M. Radmore

Kotik K. Lee

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Mathematical Methods of Quantum Optics

Ravinder Rupchand Puri

Springer series in optical sciences/SPringer series in optical sciences•Jan 1, 2001•514 citations

Home: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics/Brown.: The Neutron and the Bomb/Kuypers.: Klassische Mechanik/Davis, Falconer.: J. J. Thomson and the Discovery of the Electron/Cohen‐Tannoudji, Diu, Laloë.: Quantenmechanik/Daniel.: Physik 1: Mechanik — Wellen — Wärme‐Physik 2: Elektrodynamik — Relativistische Physik/Schmitz.: Neutrinophysik/Scully, Zubairy.: Quantum optics/Barnett, Radmore.: Methods in Theoretical Quantum Optics/EasyPlot 4/Macsyma 23 für Windows 95

Harald Weinfurter, D. Hoffmann, W. Maaß +9 more

Physikalische Blätter•Jul 1, 1998•0 citations

Selected papers on fundamentals of quantum optics

G. S. Agarwal

SPIE Optical Engineering Press eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•2 citations

Formal relation between Pegg-Barnett and Paul quantum phase frameworks

Tomasz Linowski, Konrad Schlichtholz, Łukasz Rudnicki

The problem of defining a Hermitian quantum phase operator is nearly as old as quantum mechanics itself. Throughout the years, a number of solutions have been proposed, ranging from abstract operator formalisms to phase-space methods. In this work, we make an explicit connection between two of the most prominent approaches by proving that the probability distribution of phase in the Paul formalism follows exactly from the Pegg-Barnett formalism by combining the latter with the quantum-limited amplifier channel. Our findings suggest that the Paul framework may be viewed as a semiclassical limit of the Pegg-Barnett approach.

arXiv:2205.09481•Physical Review A•Mar 20, 2023•5 citations

Phase representation of quantum-optical systems via the nonnegative quantum distribution function

Alexei Vladimirovich Chizhov, Alexander A. Gusev, Leonid A. Sevastianov +1 more

We propose a new method for describing phase distributions of nonclassical states in optical systems based on the nonnegative quantum distribution function. A comparison of the proposed method with other known methods such as the Pegg-Barnett and operational ones is given.

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters•Mar 1, 2007•0 citations

An Introduction to Quantum Optics

T. Coudreau, Claude Fabre, Serge Reynaud

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations
The problem of defining a Hermitian quantum phase operator is nearly as old as quantum mechanics itself. Throughout the years, a number of solutions have been proposed, ranging from abstract operator formalisms to phase-space methods. In this work, we make an explicit connection between two of the most prominent approaches by proving that the probability distribution of phase in the Paul formalism follows exactly from the Pegg-Barnett formalism by combining the latter with the quantum-limited amplifier channel. Our findings suggest that the Paul framework may be viewed as a semiclassical limit of the Pegg-Barnett approach.