Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A New ID-Based Deniable Authentication Protocol

LURong-xing, CAOZhen-fu, WangShengbao, BaoHaiyong

Published Jan 1, 2007• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Deniable authenticated protocol is a new cryptographic authentication protocol that enables a designated receiver to identify the source of a given message without being able to prove the identity ...
DOI
10.5555/1413889.1413895

Related papers

Universal Encrypted Deniable Authentication Protocol.

Zhenfu Cao

The notion of deniable authentication protocol was introduced in 1998 by Dwork et al. [11] and Aumann and Rabin [1, 2] independently. As a new cryptographic authentication protocol, a deniable authentication protocol enables an intended receiver to identify the source of a given message without being able to prove the identity of the sender to a third party. Over the past years, many deniable authentication protocols have been proposed. In this paper, we would like to present a universal encrypted deniable authentication protocol from any public key encryption scheme. Provided that the public key encryption scheme is secure, a secure deniable authentication protocol can be directly derived.

International journal of network security•Jan 1, 2009•3 citations

A novel certificateless deniable authentication protocol.

Chunhua Jin, Chunxiang Xu, Xiaojun Zhang +2 more

Abstract: Deniable authenticated protocol is a new and attractive protocol compared to the traditional authentication protocol. It allows the appointed receiver to identify the source of a given message, but not to prove the identity of the sender to a third party even if the appointed receiver is willing to reveal its private key. In this paper, we first define a security model for certificateless deniable authentication protocols. Then we propose a non-interactive certificateless deniable authentication protocol, by combining deniable authentication protocol with certificateless cryptography. In addition, we prove its security in the random oracle model.

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

An efficient deniable authentication protocol

Hui‐Feng Huang, Chin‐Chen Chang

The aim of deniable authenticated protocol allows the receiver to identity the source of a given message but not prove the identity of the sender to a third party. In this article, we propose a new non-interactive deniable authenticated protocol based on Diffie-Hellman key distribution protocol. It has lower communication costs and computational complexity than previously proposed schemes.

International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW)•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

A novel certificateless deniable authentication protocol

Chunhua Jin, Chunxiang Xu, Fagen Li +1 more

Deniable authenticate is a different and attractive authenticate mechanism compared with the traditional authentication. It allows the appointed receiver to identify the identity of the sender, but not to prove the source of a given message to a third party even if the appointed receiver is willing to reveal its private key. Certificateless public key cryptography can solve both the public key certificate management problem of public key infrastructure-based cryptography and the key escrow problem of identity-based cryptography. In this paper, we first define a security model for certificateless deniable authentication protocols. Then we propose a non-interactive certificateless deniable authentication protocol. In addition, we prove its security in the random oracle model. Our protocol can be applied in many actual application scenarios, such as electronic voting, electronic tendering, and online shopping.

International Journal of Computers and Applications•Oct 2, 2015•8 citations

New approaches for deniable authentication

Mario Di Raimondo, Rosario Gennaro

Deniable Authentication protocols allow a Sender to authenticate a message for a Receiver, in a way that the Receiver cannot convince a third party that such authentication (or any authentication) ever took place.We present two new approaches to the problem of deniable authentication. The novelty of our schemes is that they do not require the use of CCA-secure encryption (all previous known solutions did), thus showing a different generic approach to the problem of deniable authentication. This new approach is practically relevant as it leads to more efficient protocols and security reductions.In the process we point out a subtle definitional issue for deniability. In particular we propose the notion of forward deniability, which requires that the authentications remain deniable even if the Sender wants to later prove that she authenticated a message. We show that forward deniability is not implied by the original notion of deniability, by showing some deniable protocols which are not forward deniable. Our new proposals are forward deniable.

ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS)•Nov 7, 2005•69 citations

具保護(匿名)傳送者的可否認驗證協定

馬瑞澤

A deniable authentication protocol should satisfy the property that only the intended receiver authenticates the sender’s identity of received messages. This property is called authentication property. On the other hand, the intended receiver cannot prove the sender’s identity to the third party. The second property is called deniability property. To satisfy deniability property, in most deniable authentication protocols, the receiver is able to forge/modify the received message from the sender. Since the received data is forgeable by the receiver, the sender easily denies that he/she sent the data. Although the sent message is deniable for the sender, the sender still has no evidence to prove that he/she sent the message to prevent the receiver’s circumvention. In this propose, a new property, sender protection, is proposed for the deniable authentication protocol. In a deniable authentication protocol with sender protection, although the sent message is still forgeable by the receiver, the sender can provide an evidence to prove that whether or not the message is really sent from him/her. To protect senders more completely, it is better that the sender is anonymous in a deniable authentication protocol. Therefore, another goal of our research is to design a deniable authentication protocols with anonymous and protected sender.

•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations
The notion of deniable authentication protocol was introduced in 1998 by Dwork et al. [11] and Aumann and Rabin [1, 2] independently. As a new cryptographic authentication protocol, a deniable authentication protocol enables an intended receiver to identify the source of a given message without being able to prove the identity of the sender to a third party. Over the past years, many deniable authentication protocols have been proposed. In this paper, we would like to present a universal encrypted deniable authentication protocol from any public key encryption scheme. Provided that the public key encryption scheme is secure, a secure deniable authentication protocol can be directly derived.
Abstract: Deniable authenticated protocol is a new and attractive protocol compared to the traditional authentication protocol. It allows the appointed receiver to identify the source of a given message, but not to prove the identity of the sender to a third party even if the appointed receiver is willing to reveal its private key. In this paper, we first define a security model for certificateless deniable authentication protocols. Then we propose a non-interactive certificateless deniable authentication protocol, by combining deniable authentication protocol with certificateless cryptography. In addition, we prove its security in the random oracle model.
Deniable authenticate is a different and attractive authenticate mechanism compared with the traditional authentication. It allows the appointed receiver to identify the identity of the sender, but not to prove the source of a given message to a third party even if the appointed receiver is willing to reveal its private key. Certificateless public key cryptography can solve both the public key certificate management problem of public key infrastructure-based cryptography and the key escrow problem of identity-based cryptography. In this paper, we first define a security model for certificateless deniable authentication protocols. Then we propose a non-interactive certificateless deniable authentication protocol. In addition, we prove its security in the random oracle model. Our protocol can be applied in many actual application scenarios, such as electronic voting, electronic tendering, and online shopping.
Deniable Authentication protocols allow a Sender to authenticate a message for a Receiver, in a way that the Receiver cannot convince a third party that such authentication (or any authentication) ever took place.We present two new approaches to the problem of deniable authentication. The novelty of our schemes is that they do not require the use of CCA-secure encryption (all previous known solutions did), thus showing a different generic approach to the problem of deniable authentication. This new approach is practically relevant as it leads to more efficient protocols and security reductions.In the process we point out a subtle definitional issue for deniability. In particular we propose the notion of forward deniability, which requires that the authentications remain deniable even if the Sender wants to later prove that she authenticated a message. We show that forward deniability is not implied by the original notion of deniability, by showing some deniable protocols which are not forward deniable. Our new proposals are forward deniable.
A deniable authentication protocol should satisfy the property that only the intended receiver authenticates the sender’s identity of received messages. This property is called authentication property. On the other hand, the intended receiver cannot prove the sender’s identity to the third party. The second property is called deniability property. To satisfy deniability property, in most deniable authentication protocols, the receiver is able to forge/modify the received message from the sender. Since the received data is forgeable by the receiver, the sender easily denies that he/she sent the data. Although the sent message is deniable for the sender, the sender still has no evidence to prove that he/she sent the message to prevent the receiver’s circumvention. In this propose, a new property, sender protection, is proposed for the deniable authentication protocol. In a deniable authentication protocol with sender protection, although the sent message is still forgeable by the receiver, the sender can provide an evidence to prove that whether or not the message is really sent from him/her. To protect senders more completely, it is better that the sender is anonymous in a deniable authentication protocol. Therefore, another goal of our research is to design a deniable authentication protocols with anonymous and protected sender.