Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Experimental Demonstration of Quantum Processes with Finite Memory

Yu Chen Guo, Philip Taranto, Bi‐Heng Liu, Xiao‐Min Hu, Yun‐Feng Huang, Chuan‐Feng Li, Guang‐Can Guo

Published Mar 31, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Physical systems are inevitably coupled to their environment, leading to memory effects that influence observed statistics; the duration, strength and structure of which are crucial properties of the evolution. Due to the invasive nature of measurement, such properties must be defined with respect to the instruments used to probe the dynamics. Using a photonic platform, we experimentally demonstrate the necessity of describing quantum memory properties in an instrument-specific manner via two paradigmatic processes: the first has finite memory with respect to a quantum measurement; the second, a noisy classical measurement. The former example highlights that future-history correlations can be deterministically erased via quantum measurement, whereas the latter distinguishes quantum from classical measurements: although the classical measurement blocks the history, the process exhibits temporal correlations for more general quantum interrogations. Our methods are relevant to constructing processes with desired memory structures, as required to develop efficient quantum technologies.

Related papers

Experimental Demonstration of Instrument-Specific Quantum Memory Effects and Non-Markovian Process Recovery for Common-Cause Processes

Yu Guo, Philip Taranto, Bi‐Heng Liu +4 more

The duration, strength, and structure of memory effects are crucial properties of physical evolution. Because of the invasive nature of quantum measurement, such properties must be defined with respect to the probing instruments employed. Here, using a photonic platform, we experimentally demonstrate this necessity via two paradigmatic processes: future-history correlations in the first process can be erased by an intermediate quantum measurement; for the second process, a noisy classical measurement blocks the effect of history. We then apply memory truncation techniques to recover an efficient description that approximates expectation values for multitime observables. Our proof-of-principle analysis paves the way for experiments concerning more general non-Markovian quantum processes and highlights where standard open systems techniques break down.

arXiv:2003.14045•Physical Review Letters•Jun 9, 2021•24 citations

Memory effects in quantum processes

Philip Taranto

Understanding temporal processes and their correlations in time is of paramount importance for the development of near-term technologies that operate under realistic conditions. Capturing the complete multi-time statistics that define a stochastic process lies at the heart of any proper treatment of memory effects. This is well understood in classical theory, where a hierarchy of joint probability distributions completely characterizes the process at hand. However, attempting to generalize this notion to quantum mechanics is problematic: observing realizations of a quantum process necessarily disturbs the state of the system, breaking an implicit, and crucial, assumption in the classical setting. This issue can be overcome by separating the experimental interventions from the underlying process, enabling an unambiguous description of the process itself and accounting for all possible multi-time correlations for any choice of interrogating instruments. In this paper, using a novel framework for the characterization of quantum stochastic processes, we first solve the long standing question of unambiguously describing the memory length of a quantum processes. This is achieved by constructing a quantum Markov order condition, which naturally generalizes its classical counterpart for the quantification of finite-length memory effects. As measurements are inherently invasive in quantum mechanics, one has no choice but to define Markov order with respect to the interrogating instruments that are used to probe the process at hand: different memory effects are exhibited depending on how one addresses the system, in contrast to the standard classical setting. We then fully characterize the structural constraints imposed on quantum processes with finite Markov order, shedding light on a variety of memory effects that can arise through various examples. Finally, we introduce an instrument-specific notion of memory strength that allows for a meaningful quantification of the temporal correlations between the history and the future of a process for a given choice of experimental intervention. These findings are directly relevant to both characterizing and exploiting memory effects that persist for a finite duration. In particular, immediate applications range from developing efficient compression and recovery schemes for the description of quantum processes with memory to designing coherent control protocols that efficiently perform information-theoretic tasks, amongst a plethora of others.

arXiv:1909.05245•International Journal of Quantum Information•Jan 7, 2020•12 citations

Structure of quantum stochastic processes with finite Markov order

Philip Taranto, Simon Milz, Felix A. Pollock +1 more

Non-Markovian quantum processes exhibit different memory effects when measured in different ways; an unambiguous characterization of memory length requires accounting for the sequence of instruments applied to probe the system dynamics. This instrument-specific notion of quantum Markov order displays stark differences to its classical counterpart. Here, we explore the structure of quantum stochastic processes with finite memory length in detail. We begin by examining a generalized collision model with memory, before framing this instance within the general theory. We detail the constraints that are placed on the underlying system-environment dynamics for a process to exhibit finite Markov order with respect to natural classes of probing instruments, including deterministic (unitary) operations and sequences of generalized quantum measurements with informationally complete repreparations. Lastly, we show how processes with vanishing quantum conditional mutual information form a special case of the theory. Throughout, we provide a number of representative, pedagogical examples to display the salient features of memory effects in quantum processes.

arXiv:1810.10809•Physical Review A•Apr 9, 2019•65 citations

Hidden Quantum Memory: Is Memory There When Somebody Looks?

Philip Taranto, Thomas J. Elliott, Simon Milz

In classical physics, memoryless dynamics and Markovian statistics are one and the same. This is not true for quantum dynamics, first and foremost because quantum measurements are invasive. Going beyond measurement invasiveness, here we derive a novel distinction between classical and quantum processes, namely the possibility of hidden quantum memory . While Markovian statistics of classical processes can always be reproduced by a memoryless dynamical model, our main result shows that this is not true in quantum mechanics: We first provide an example of quantum non-Markovianity whose manifestation depends on whether or not a previous measurement is performed – an impossible phenomenon for memoryless dynamics; we then strengthen this result by demonstrating statistics that are Markovian independent of how they are probed, but are nonetheless s t i l l incompatible with memoryless quantum dynamics. Thus, we establish the existence of Markovian statistics gathered by probing a quantum process that nevertheless f u n d a m e n t a l l y require memory for their creation.

arXiv:2204.08298•Quantum•Apr 27, 2023•6 citations

Quantum non-Markovian response spectra

Aaron Sander, John F. Kam, Gauthameshwar S. +2 more

Quantum systems are rarely isolated from their surroundings. These hidden environments can retain information and return it later, producing correlated errors in quantum computers and complicating the interpretation of experiments. On a quantum processor, for example, one job can therefore leave an environmental trace that affects the next, even after the qubits themselves have been reset. Learning how this hidden influence persists and affects later behavior is therefore important, but the environment is often impossible to measure directly, and fully reconstructing its effects through tomography rapidly becomes impractical. Here, we introduce a response matrix that uses controlled interventions and observations of the system alone to reveal the temporal structure of environmental memory. The matrix records how future observations change across different controlled histories. Its spectrum characterizes how memory is structured and how it persists under specified system resets, while suitable linear combinations of its entries can rule out specified classical models of that memory. Because its history-future queries can be evaluated independently, numerical response matrices can be assembled in parallel. We establish the framework theoretically, characterize response spectra in an interacting spin process, and certify quantum memory in a two-qubit benchmark. This approach turns system observations into a probe of inaccessible environments and could support the diagnosis of correlated noise, tests of open system models, and memory-aware control design.

quant-pharXiv:2610.10684•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Markov Order

Philip Taranto, Felix A. Pollock, Simon Milz +2 more

We formally extend the notion of Markov order to open quantum processes by accounting for the instruments used to probe the system of interest at different times. Our description recovers the classical property in the appropriate limit: when the stochastic process is classical and the instruments are noninvasive, i.e., restricted to orthogonal, projective measurements. We then prove that there do not exist non-Markovian quantum processes that have finite Markov order with respect to all possible instruments; the same process exhibits distinct memory effects when probed by different instruments. This naturally leads to a relaxed definition of quantum Markov order with respect to specified instrument sequences. The memory effects captured by different choices of instruments vary dramatically, providing a rich landscape for future exploration.

arXiv:1805.11341•Physical Review Letters•Apr 9, 2019•67 citations
Physical systems are inevitably coupled to their environment, leading to memory effects that influence observed statistics; the duration, strength and structure of which are crucial properties of the evolution. Due to the invasive nature of measurement, such properties must be defined with respect to the instruments used to probe the dynamics. Using a photonic platform, we experimentally demonstrate the necessity of describing quantum memory properties in an instrument-specific manner via two paradigmatic processes: the first has finite memory with respect to a quantum measurement; the second, a noisy classical measurement. The former example highlights that future-history correlations can be deterministically erased via quantum measurement, whereas the latter distinguishes quantum from classical measurements: although the classical measurement blocks the history, the process exhibits temporal correlations for more general quantum interrogations. Our methods are relevant to constructing processes with desired memory structures, as required to develop efficient quantum technologies.
The duration, strength, and structure of memory effects are crucial properties of physical evolution. Because of the invasive nature of quantum measurement, such properties must be defined with respect to the probing instruments employed. Here, using a photonic platform, we experimentally demonstrate this necessity via two paradigmatic processes: future-history correlations in the first process can be erased by an intermediate quantum measurement; for the second process, a noisy classical measurement blocks the effect of history. We then apply memory truncation techniques to recover an efficient description that approximates expectation values for multitime observables. Our proof-of-principle analysis paves the way for experiments concerning more general non-Markovian quantum processes and highlights where standard open systems techniques break down.
Understanding temporal processes and their correlations in time is of paramount importance for the development of near-term technologies that operate under realistic conditions. Capturing the complete multi-time statistics that define a stochastic process lies at the heart of any proper treatment of memory effects. This is well understood in classical theory, where a hierarchy of joint probability distributions completely characterizes the process at hand. However, attempting to generalize this notion to quantum mechanics is problematic: observing realizations of a quantum process necessarily disturbs the state of the system, breaking an implicit, and crucial, assumption in the classical setting. This issue can be overcome by separating the experimental interventions from the underlying process, enabling an unambiguous description of the process itself and accounting for all possible multi-time correlations for any choice of interrogating instruments. In this paper, using a novel framework for the characterization of quantum stochastic processes, we first solve the long standing question of unambiguously describing the memory length of a quantum processes. This is achieved by constructing a quantum Markov order condition, which naturally generalizes its classical counterpart for the quantification of finite-length memory effects. As measurements are inherently invasive in quantum mechanics, one has no choice but to define Markov order with respect to the interrogating instruments that are used to probe the process at hand: different memory effects are exhibited depending on how one addresses the system, in contrast to the standard classical setting. We then fully characterize the structural constraints imposed on quantum processes with finite Markov order, shedding light on a variety of memory effects that can arise through various examples. Finally, we introduce an instrument-specific notion of memory strength that allows for a meaningful quantification of the temporal correlations between the history and the future of a process for a given choice of experimental intervention. These findings are directly relevant to both characterizing and exploiting memory effects that persist for a finite duration. In particular, immediate applications range from developing efficient compression and recovery schemes for the description of quantum processes with memory to designing coherent control protocols that efficiently perform information-theoretic tasks, amongst a plethora of others.
Non-Markovian quantum processes exhibit different memory effects when measured in different ways; an unambiguous characterization of memory length requires accounting for the sequence of instruments applied to probe the system dynamics. This instrument-specific notion of quantum Markov order displays stark differences to its classical counterpart. Here, we explore the structure of quantum stochastic processes with finite memory length in detail. We begin by examining a generalized collision model with memory, before framing this instance within the general theory. We detail the constraints that are placed on the underlying system-environment dynamics for a process to exhibit finite Markov order with respect to natural classes of probing instruments, including deterministic (unitary) operations and sequences of generalized quantum measurements with informationally complete repreparations. Lastly, we show how processes with vanishing quantum conditional mutual information form a special case of the theory. Throughout, we provide a number of representative, pedagogical examples to display the salient features of memory effects in quantum processes.
In classical physics, memoryless dynamics and Markovian statistics are one and the same. This is not true for quantum dynamics, first and foremost because quantum measurements are invasive. Going beyond measurement invasiveness, here we derive a novel distinction between classical and quantum processes, namely the possibility of hidden quantum memory . While Markovian statistics of classical processes can always be reproduced by a memoryless dynamical model, our main result shows that this is not true in quantum mechanics: We first provide an example of quantum non-Markovianity whose manifestation depends on whether or not a previous measurement is performed – an impossible phenomenon for memoryless dynamics; we then strengthen this result by demonstrating statistics that are Markovian independent of how they are probed, but are nonetheless s t i l l incompatible with memoryless quantum dynamics. Thus, we establish the existence of Markovian statistics gathered by probing a quantum process that nevertheless f u n d a m e n t a l l y require memory for their creation.
Quantum systems are rarely isolated from their surroundings. These hidden environments can retain information and return it later, producing correlated errors in quantum computers and complicating the interpretation of experiments. On a quantum processor, for example, one job can therefore leave an environmental trace that affects the next, even after the qubits themselves have been reset. Learning how this hidden influence persists and affects later behavior is therefore important, but the environment is often impossible to measure directly, and fully reconstructing its effects through tomography rapidly becomes impractical. Here, we introduce a response matrix that uses controlled interventions and observations of the system alone to reveal the temporal structure of environmental memory. The matrix records how future observations change across different controlled histories. Its spectrum characterizes how memory is structured and how it persists under specified system resets, while suitable linear combinations of its entries can rule out specified classical models of that memory. Because its history-future queries can be evaluated independently, numerical response matrices can be assembled in parallel. We establish the framework theoretically, characterize response spectra in an interacting spin process, and certify quantum memory in a two-qubit benchmark. This approach turns system observations into a probe of inaccessible environments and could support the diagnosis of correlated noise, tests of open system models, and memory-aware control design.
We formally extend the notion of Markov order to open quantum processes by accounting for the instruments used to probe the system of interest at different times. Our description recovers the classical property in the appropriate limit: when the stochastic process is classical and the instruments are noninvasive, i.e., restricted to orthogonal, projective measurements. We then prove that there do not exist non-Markovian quantum processes that have finite Markov order with respect to all possible instruments; the same process exhibits distinct memory effects when probed by different instruments. This naturally leads to a relaxed definition of quantum Markov order with respect to specified instrument sequences. The memory effects captured by different choices of instruments vary dramatically, providing a rich landscape for future exploration.