According to quantum mechanics, the commutation property of the energy Hamiltonian with the momentum operator should give the definite values not only for energy but also for the momentum quantum levels. A difficulty provided by the standing-like boundary conditions of the electron gas is that the Hamiltonian eigenfunctions are different than eigenfunctions of the momentum operator. In results the electron momenta are obtained from the correspondence rule between the classical and quantum mechanics given by Landau and Lifshits. As a consequence the statistics of solutions representing not only the energy values but also the electron momenta should be taken into account. In the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, the momenta are easily obtained because the electron oscillators are there directly considered. In fact, the Hamiltonian entering the Heisenberg method can be defined in two different ways each giving the set of the electron energies known from the Schr?dinger’s approach.
According to quantum mechanics, the commutation property of the energy Hamiltonian with the momentum operator should give the definite values not only for energy but also for the momentum quantum levels. A difficulty provided by the standing-like boundary conditions of the electron gas is that the Hamiltonian eigenfunctions are different than eigenfunctions of the momentum operator. In results the electron momenta are obtained from the correspondence rule between the classical and quantum mechanics given by Landau and Lifshits. As a consequence the statistics of solutions representing not only the energy values but also the electron momenta should be taken into account. In the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, the momenta are easily obtained because the electron oscillators are there directly considered. In fact, the Hamiltonian entering the Heisenberg method can be defined in two different ways each giving the set of the electron energies known from the Schr?dinger’s approach.
The postulates of quantum mechanics associate the time-evolution of a system with its time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We start by examining different solutions to this equation for a particle, represented in terms of a Gaussian wave packet, in different scenarios: free, scattered from a potential energy barrier, or trapped in a potential energy well. In some cases, we encounter stationary solutions, in which the probability density does not change in time (a standing wave). These solutions are identified as eigenfunctions of a system Hamiltonian. The properties of the Hamiltonian as a Hermitian operator are introduced, and particularly, the fact that its proper eigenfunctions can compose an orthonormal set, and that the corresponding eigenvalues are real-valued. Learning that all operators that relate to measurables are Hermitian, and that their eigenvalues relate to the measured values, we conclude that the eigenvalues of the energy operator (Hamiltonian) are the energy levels of the quantum system.
The Heisenberg uncertainty postulates are a convenient way to describe the qualitative properties of quantum mechanics. The response from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is that one can create states that require a certain amount of momentum and position localization. The numerical quantities used by the old Newtonian mechanics, position, momentum, and energy are mere “shadows” of what nature describes: operators. The energy value contradicts the Newtonian notion of any energy level being necessary for a harmonic oscillator. The basic postulates of classical statistical mechanics are now applied to quantum statistical mechanics. In classical mechanics, the variables characterize a microstate that evolves according to the Hamiltonian equations. If the standard deviation relative to what we are interested in is very high, it is probably safe to use the expected value as a classical value. A quantum field theory is a relativistic invariant quantum theory where there is a particular form of quantity operators connected with the classical fields.
The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.
In classical mechanics the state of a system is defined by the numerical values of a set of dynamical variables such as the position coordinates and the velocities. In quantum mechanics the state of a system at an instant is represented by a unit vector in a Hilbert space, where a set of axes are the eigenvectors of a complete set of observables. The description of quantum dynamics where the wave function is time-dependent and the operators describing the observables are time-independent is known as the Schrodinger picture. The use of total time derivative of operator that depends on the time evolution of the wave function as well as on any intrinsic time-dependence in the operators simplifies the development of quantum mechanics and allows the development to more closely follow the corresponding development of classical mechanics. The difference between the Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures is best understood as the difference in the basic set of observables.
In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.
A quantum theory for a one-electron system can be developed in either Heisenberg picture or Schrodinger picture. For a many-electron system, a theory must be developed in the Heisenberg picture, and the indistinguishability and Pauli’s exclusion principle must be incorporated. The hydrogen atom energy levels are obtained by solving the Schrodinger energy eigenvalue equation, which is the most significant result obtained in the Schrodinger picture. Both boson and fermion field equations are nonlinear in the presence of a pair interaction.