Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II

Optical atomic clock comparisons using correlation spectroscopy (Conference Presentation)

May E. Kim

Published Mar 27, 2020• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1117/12.2552651

Related papers

Molecular lattice clock with long vibrational coherence (Conference Presentation)

Hendrick Bekker

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Mar 9, 2020•0 citations

Phase-sensitive optical spectroscopy of a laser-cooled, microwave atomic clock

Rachel Elvin

•Jan 1, 2020•0 citations

Intercontinental comparison of optical atomic clocks through very long baseline interferometry

Marco Pizzocaro, Mamoru Sekido, Kazuhiro Takefuji +30 more

Nature Physics•Oct 5, 2020•64 citations

Optical atomic clocks and metrology

Andrew D. Ludlow

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 6, 2014•0 citations

Leveraging correlated laser noise to improve optical frequency comparisons

Ethan Clements, M. Bohman, May E. Kim +14 more

Laser noise usually limits the stability of optical frequency ratio measurements, limiting the speed and precision one can compare two atomic frequency standards. In this talk I will describe two methods, correlation and differential spectroscopy, which utilize correlations in laser noise to increase the achievable interrogation time and thus increase the frequency comparison stability. Correlation spectroscopy is a technique which uses a parity measurement following a synchronized Ramsey interrogation to measure the relative frequency of two similar frequency atomic clocks. With this technique we achieve a measurement instability of (4×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) for a comparison of two single 27Al+ ion clocks. Differential spectroscopy uses an atomic clock with low projection noise, here a 171Yb lattice clock, to correct the phase noise of a second, higher frequency clock’s local oscillator thereby reducing the measurement instability to the level of the first. This can be further extended using two lattice clocks in a zero dead time configuration to correct the phase noise beyond the interrogation time reachable for a single Yb lattice clock. With these techniques we achieve measurement stabilities of (2.5×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) and (2×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) for a comparison between a single 27Al+ ion clock and a 171Yb lattice clock running as single clock and in a zero dead time configuration respectively. In addition to these techniques, I will also discuss recent progress towards characterizing the systematics of the NIST 40Ca+/27Al+ optical atomic clock.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Mar 9, 2022•0 citations

176 Lu + clock comparison at the 10 −18 level via correlation spectroscopy

Zhiqiang Zhang, K. J. Arnold, R. Kaewuam +1 more

The extreme precision of optical atomic clocks has led to an anticipated redefinition of the second by the International System of Units. Furthermore, accuracies pushing the boundary of 1 part in 10 18 and beyond will enable new applications, such as in geodesy and tests of fundamental physics. The 1 S 0 to 3 D 1 optical transition in 176 Lu + has exceptionally low sensitivity to external perturbations, making it suitable for practical clock implementations with inaccuracy at or below 10 −18 . Here, we perform high-accuracy comparisons between two 176 Lu + references using correlation spectroscopy. A comparison at different magnetic fields is used to obtain a quadratic Zeeman coefficient of −4.89264(88) Hz/mT for the reference frequency. With a subsequent comparison at low field, we demonstrate agreement at the low 10 −18 level, statistically limited by the averaging time of 42 hours. The evaluated uncertainty in the frequency difference is 9 × 10 −19 and the lowest reported in comparing independent optical references.

arXiv:2212.04652•Science Advances•May 3, 2023•65 citations
Laser noise usually limits the stability of optical frequency ratio measurements, limiting the speed and precision one can compare two atomic frequency standards. In this talk I will describe two methods, correlation and differential spectroscopy, which utilize correlations in laser noise to increase the achievable interrogation time and thus increase the frequency comparison stability. Correlation spectroscopy is a technique which uses a parity measurement following a synchronized Ramsey interrogation to measure the relative frequency of two similar frequency atomic clocks. With this technique we achieve a measurement instability of (4×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) for a comparison of two single 27Al+ ion clocks. Differential spectroscopy uses an atomic clock with low projection noise, here a 171Yb lattice clock, to correct the phase noise of a second, higher frequency clock’s local oscillator thereby reducing the measurement instability to the level of the first. This can be further extended using two lattice clocks in a zero dead time configuration to correct the phase noise beyond the interrogation time reachable for a single Yb lattice clock. With these techniques we achieve measurement stabilities of (2.5×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) and (2×10^(-16))⁄√(τ⁄s) for a comparison between a single 27Al+ ion clock and a 171Yb lattice clock running as single clock and in a zero dead time configuration respectively. In addition to these techniques, I will also discuss recent progress towards characterizing the systematics of the NIST 40Ca+/27Al+ optical atomic clock.
The extreme precision of optical atomic clocks has led to an anticipated redefinition of the second by the International System of Units. Furthermore, accuracies pushing the boundary of 1 part in 10 18 and beyond will enable new applications, such as in geodesy and tests of fundamental physics. The 1 S 0 to 3 D 1 optical transition in 176 Lu + has exceptionally low sensitivity to external perturbations, making it suitable for practical clock implementations with inaccuracy at or below 10 −18 . Here, we perform high-accuracy comparisons between two 176 Lu + references using correlation spectroscopy. A comparison at different magnetic fields is used to obtain a quadratic Zeeman coefficient of −4.89264(88) Hz/mT for the reference frequency. With a subsequent comparison at low field, we demonstrate agreement at the low 10 −18 level, statistically limited by the averaging time of 42 hours. The evaluated uncertainty in the frequency difference is 9 × 10 −19 and the lowest reported in comparing independent optical references.