Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Regionally specific hyperfine polarization of rubidium atoms in the vicinity of surfaces

Kaifeng Zhao

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Regionally specific hyperfine polarization of Rb atoms at micron/submicron distance from the Pyrex glass surfaces in optical pumping cells

Kaifeng Zhao, Zhaohui Wu

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 16, 2006•0 citations

Regionally specific hyperfine polarization of Rb atoms in the vicinity (∼10−5cm) of surfaces

Kaifeng Zhao, Zhan‐Chao Wu

We made regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization $⟨\mathbit{S}∙\mathbit{I}⟩$ of Rb atoms in the vicinity $(\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{cm})$ of coated and uncoated Pyrex glass surfaces in optical pumping cells. This is in contrast to the previous hyperfine polarization studies, where the quantity measured is the bulk hyperfine polarization, which depends on surface interactions averaged over the entire cell surfaces. We probe the hyperfine polarization of the Rb atoms in the vicinity of cell surfaces using the evanescent wave of a weak laser beam. We find that the polarization in the vicinity of uncoated surfaces is significantly lower than that in the bulk. The polarization decreases rapidly with decreasing distance from the surface. By contrast, the polarization in the vicinity of a silicone-coated Pyrex glass surface is independent of the distance from the cell surface and is equal to the bulk polarization. Regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization as a function of the penetration depth of the evanescent wave allows us to deduce the hyperfine polarization, its normal gradient, as well as the normal gradient coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}∙\mathbit{I}}$ at the cell surface. We present the values of these quantities for three representative uncoated cells.

Physical Review A•Jan 19, 2005•16 citations

The effects of coated surfaces on rubidium polarizations

Paul Abed, Mark Rosenberry

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Oct 14, 2005•0 citations

Two-color polarization spectroscopy of rubidium

P. Kulatunga, H. C. Busch, L.R. Andrews +1 more

Optics Communications•Feb 27, 2012•24 citations

Hyperfine Polarization and Its Normal Gradient Coefficient of Rb87 Atoms in the Vicinity ( ∼10−5 cm ) of Coated and Uncoated Pyrex Glass Surfaces

Kaifeng Zhao, Z. Wu

We have made regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization $⟨\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}⟩$ of $^{87}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{b}$ atoms in the vicinity ($\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$) of coated and uncoated Pyrex glass surfaces. We find that the polarization near an uncoated surface decreases rapidly with decreasing distance from the surface whereas for a silicone-coated surface the polarization is independent of the distance from the surface. We have also determined the normal gradient coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}}$ of the hyperfine polarization in uncoated cells. In a representative uncoated cell, at a Rb density $7.35\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{13}\text{ }{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ and a pump beam intensity $1.3\text{ }\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{2}$, we find ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}}=24\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$.

Physical Review Letters•Sep 10, 2003•10 citations

Hyperfine Structure of the Resonance Lines of Rubidium

A. V. Hollenberg

Physical Review•Jul 15, 1937•6 citations
We made regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization $⟨\mathbit{S}∙\mathbit{I}⟩$ of Rb atoms in the vicinity $(\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{cm})$ of coated and uncoated Pyrex glass surfaces in optical pumping cells. This is in contrast to the previous hyperfine polarization studies, where the quantity measured is the bulk hyperfine polarization, which depends on surface interactions averaged over the entire cell surfaces. We probe the hyperfine polarization of the Rb atoms in the vicinity of cell surfaces using the evanescent wave of a weak laser beam. We find that the polarization in the vicinity of uncoated surfaces is significantly lower than that in the bulk. The polarization decreases rapidly with decreasing distance from the surface. By contrast, the polarization in the vicinity of a silicone-coated Pyrex glass surface is independent of the distance from the cell surface and is equal to the bulk polarization. Regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization as a function of the penetration depth of the evanescent wave allows us to deduce the hyperfine polarization, its normal gradient, as well as the normal gradient coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}∙\mathbit{I}}$ at the cell surface. We present the values of these quantities for three representative uncoated cells.
We have made regionally specific measurement of the hyperfine polarization $⟨\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}⟩$ of 87Rb^{87}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{b}87Rb atoms in the vicinity ($\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5}\text{ }\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}$) of coated and uncoated Pyrex glass surfaces. We find that the polarization near an uncoated surface decreases rapidly with decreasing distance from the surface whereas for a silicone-coated surface the polarization is independent of the distance from the surface. We have also determined the normal gradient coefficient ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}}$ of the hyperfine polarization in uncoated cells. In a representative uncoated cell, at a Rb density $7.35\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{13}\text{ }{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ and a pump beam intensity 1.3 W/cm21.3\text{ }\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{2}1.3 W/cm2, we find ${\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\mathbit{S}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbit{I}}=24\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}7\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}{\mathrm{m}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$.