Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Calculation of Expectation Values and Uncertainty for Linear Potential by Using Numerov Method

Hasan Bircan, Abdullah Engin Çalık, Kaan Manisa

Published Jan 1, 2020• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Barrier penetration in a discrete basis formalism

K. Hagino

A standard way to solve a Schrödinger equation is to discreteize the radial coordinates and apply a numerical method for a differential equation, such as the Runge-Kutta method or the Numerov method. Here I employ a discrete basis formalism based on a finite mesh method as a simpler alternative, with which the numerical computation can be easily implemented by ordinary linear algebra operations. I compare the numerical convergence of the Numerov integration method to the finite mesh method for calculating penetrabilities of a one-dimensional potential barrier, and show that the latter approach has better convergence properties.

arXiv:2311.00925•Nov 2, 2023•0 citations

Finite linear potential model

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Variational treatment of the linear potential

Bruce Cameron Reed

American Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 1990•3 citations

Expectation Value and Uncertainty of Helium Ion (He+) Electron Position in the Position Space Wave Function at Quantum Numbers n 4

Zidan Afidah, Bambang Supriadi, Rif’ati Dina Handayani

The positive helium ion consists of two protons and one orbital electron to be viewed as a hydrogenic atom. The use of ions has very potential, especially in the development of spintronic devices and plasma-based sterilization. This study aims to determine the expected value and position uncertainty of He^+ ion electrons. Determination of the expected value and position uncertainty is done by analytical calculation through the Schrodinger method approach, especially the radial part at quantum number n≤4, and numerical calculation with the help of a simulation program. The results showed that the main quantum number and orbital n, l influence the expectation value and position uncertainty. The greater the main quantum number n, the expectation value of electron position decreases and the uncertainty of electron position increases. At the same time, the increase in the orbital quantum number l has an impact on the value, which tends to go down. This research is in accordance with de Broglie's hypothesis about the nature of dualism and the principle of uncertainty in the review of position space.

BULETIN FISIKA•Jan 28, 2026•0 citations

On the Calculation of Potentials from Densities

Scott H. Werden, Ernest R. Davidson

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1984•12 citations

Analysis And Simulation Of Schrődinger Eigenfunctions Of Several Potentials With Numerov Method

FendaRizky Pratama

The eigenfunctions as the solutions of Schrodinger equation for particle in the box, simple harmonic and perturbed oscillators, as well as in the case of Coloumb, linear, Morse, Yukawa, and modified Woods-Saxon potentials are simulated with fourth-order Numerov algorithm. The simulation techniques for initialization, which is aimed to acquire qualitative behaviour of eigenfunctions are derived by solving Schrodinger equation in particular region directly or by WKB approximation and Bohr-Sommerfeld quatization rule. The simulated eigenfunctions possess good accuracy, with maximum relative error in the order 10─3 compared to the analytical eigenfunctions or are in the good agreements with the analytical eigenfunctions calculated in the previous works. This work also provides some illustrations of how approximation methods are able to improve the accuracy in computational simulations.

•Aug 22, 2016•0 citations
A standard way to solve a Schrödinger equation is to discreteize the radial coordinates and apply a numerical method for a differential equation, such as the Runge-Kutta method or the Numerov method. Here I employ a discrete basis formalism based on a finite mesh method as a simpler alternative, with which the numerical computation can be easily implemented by ordinary linear algebra operations. I compare the numerical convergence of the Numerov integration method to the finite mesh method for calculating penetrabilities of a one-dimensional potential barrier, and show that the latter approach has better convergence properties.
The positive helium ion consists of two protons and one orbital electron to be viewed as a hydrogenic atom. The use of ions has very potential, especially in the development of spintronic devices and plasma-based sterilization. This study aims to determine the expected value and position uncertainty of He^+ ion electrons. Determination of the expected value and position uncertainty is done by analytical calculation through the Schrodinger method approach, especially the radial part at quantum number n≤4, and numerical calculation with the help of a simulation program. The results showed that the main quantum number and orbital n, l influence the expectation value and position uncertainty. The greater the main quantum number n, the expectation value of electron position decreases and the uncertainty of electron position increases. At the same time, the increase in the orbital quantum number l has an impact on the value, which tends to go down. This research is in accordance with de Broglie's hypothesis about the nature of dualism and the principle of uncertainty in the review of position space.
The eigenfunctions as the solutions of Schrodinger equation for particle in the box, simple harmonic and perturbed oscillators, as well as in the case of Coloumb, linear, Morse, Yukawa, and modified Woods-Saxon potentials are simulated with fourth-order Numerov algorithm. The simulation techniques for initialization, which is aimed to acquire qualitative behaviour of eigenfunctions are derived by solving Schrodinger equation in particular region directly or by WKB approximation and Bohr-Sommerfeld quatization rule. The simulated eigenfunctions possess good accuracy, with maximum relative error in the order 10─3 compared to the analytical eigenfunctions or are in the good agreements with the analytical eigenfunctions calculated in the previous works. This work also provides some illustrations of how approximation methods are able to improve the accuracy in computational simulations.