Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

European Journal of Physics

Equal reflection and transmission probabilities

Mark R. A. Shegelski, Caleb M. Sample

Published Mar 3, 2020• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract We consider a quantum particle with energy E incident upon a one-dimensional potential. We show that the probabilities of transmission and reflection are the same for incidence upon a general potential from either side (from ‘the left’ or ‘the right’). This equality holds true for any potential which goes to constant values as x → ± ∞ and is finite for all x . We present a remarkably simple proof that the probabilities are equal. The simplicity of our proof is the most important pedagogical result of our paper, and will be easily understood by undergraduate students in second to fourth year. We discuss several cases, including the step potential and the potential barrier.

DOI
10.1088/1361-6404/ab7c37

Related papers

Time-dependent versus time-independent probabilities of transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon a step potential and a square potential well

Mark R. A. Shegelski, Kevin Malmgren, Logan Salayka-Ladouceur

We investigate the transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon a step potential decrease and a square well. The probabilities of transmission and reflection using the time-independent Schrödinger equation and also the time-dependent Schrödinger equation are in excellent agreement. We explain why the probabilities agree so well. In doing so, we make use of an exact analytical expression for the square well for time-dependent transmission and reflection, which reveals additional interesting and unexpected results. One such result is that transmission of a wave packet can occur with the probability of transmission depending weakly on the initial spread of the packet. The explanations and the additional results will be of interest to instructors of and students in upper year undergraduate quantum mechanics courses.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Oct 2, 2015•1 citation

Time-dependent versus time-independent probabilities of transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon potentials with large changes

Mark R. A. Shegelski, Kevin Malmgren

We investigate the transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon a step potential increase, a step potential decrease, a square well, and a square barrier, all well studied in undergraduate quantum mechanics. We are especially interested in the extreme where the change in the potential is arbitrarily large, but with the difference in the energy of the particle and the potential held fixed, if possible. We obtain the probabilities of transmission and reflection using the time-independent Schrödinger equation and also the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. In the time-dependent case, we have the particle initially in a Gaussian wave packet or a similar localized state. We obtain results that fall into three categories: results that are not surprising, results where time-dependent and time-independent agree surprisingly well, and results that are very different. We discuss the unexpected results. Our work may be of interest to instructors of and students in upper year undergraduate quantum mechanics courses.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jun 11, 2015•3 citations

Schrödinger transmission through one-dimensional complex potentials

Zafar Ahmed

We prove that for a symmetric complex potential, the probabilities of quantal reflection and transmission of a particle are independent of the direction of incidence of the particle. However, the reflectivity for a nonsymmetric complex potential is found to be sensitive to the direction of incidence of the particle whether it is incident from left or right.

Physical Review A•Sep 1, 2001•77 citations

Analysis of the Case of a 1-D Potential Barrier When the Energy of the Incident Particle Beam is Equal to the Potential of the System

Akhmad Aminudin Bama, Supardi Supardi, Simon Rafael Sihombing +3 more

In this paper, the results of the analysis of the 1-dimensional potential barrier case are presented when the energy of the incident beam is equal to the potential of the system (𝐸 = 𝑉 0 ).The analysis was carried out using a computational simulation based on Python programming by reviewing the values of the reflection and transmission coefficients and their influence on the amplitude of the wave function.As an example case for simulation, the potential value of the system 𝑉 0 = 60 × 10 -39 J is taken.First, an approach is made when the system energy E approaches the potential 𝑉 0 from below (𝐸 ≲ 𝑉 0 ), then an approach is made when the system energy E approaches the potential 𝑉 0 from above (𝐸 ≳ 𝑉 0 ).From these two approaches, the result is that for both the 𝐸 ≲ 𝑉 0 and 𝐸 ≳ 𝑉 0 cases, the graph shape is almost the same with slightly different amplitudes.The amplitude for the system with 𝐸 = 61 × 10 -39 J is larger than for the system 𝐸 = 59 × 10 -39 J.An important event is that when the energy of the incident beam is equal to the potential of the system (𝐸 = 𝑉 0 ), the reflection and transmission coefficient values are undefined so that no amplitude appears in the visualization of the programming results.Thus, it is impossible to obtain information about the particle beam in the potential region 𝑉 0 .

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Constraints on the reciprocal propagation of a quantum particle through a one-dimensional localized complex potential

Ethan Knox, P. T. Leung

In the propagation of an electron through a one-dimensional asymmetric complex potential, it is known that while the conventional Green function reciprocity symmetry will ensure transmission to be symmetric between a “left-incident” and a “right-incident” beam, no such symmetry exists for the case of reflection. Here we derive generalized reciprocity relations for both the amplitude and phase of the reflected waves as constraints on the left- and right-incident beams, in complete analogy to what was established in optics. We further provide illustrations of these relations via direct analytical calculations in the case of a real potential, and via numerical studies in the case of a complex potential.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jan 22, 2013•0 citations

Note on the Transmission and Reflection of Wave Packets by Potential Barriers

L. A. MacColl

In previous studies, by the methods of wave mechanics, of one-dimensional motion of particles in cases in which there are intervals in which the value of the potential energy function $V(x)$ exceeds the value of the total energy $E$, attention has been confined to wave functions of the form $f(x, E)\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}\mathrm{iEt}}{h})$. In the present note wave packets are considered, instead of these trains of waves.The function $V(x)$ is taken as follows: ${V(x),=0 \mathrm{for} x<0 \mathrm{and}\mathrm{for} x>a,}{={V}_{0}>0 \mathrm{for} 0<x<a.}$ A wave function is set up which initially represents a wave packet moving toward the point $x=0$ from the left. The separation of the incident packet into a reflected packet and a transmitted packet is studied. It is found that the transmitted packet appears at the point $x=a$ at about the time at which the incident packet reaches the point $x=0$, so that there is no appreciable delay in the transmission of the packet through the barrier.

Physical Review•May 15, 1932•349 citations
Abstract We consider a quantum particle with energy E incident upon a one-dimensional potential. We show that the probabilities of transmission and reflection are the same for incidence upon a general potential from either side (from ‘the left’ or ‘the right’). This equality holds true for any potential which goes to constant values as x → ± ∞ and is finite for all x . We present a remarkably simple proof that the probabilities are equal. The simplicity of our proof is the most important pedagogical result of our paper, and will be easily understood by undergraduate students in second to fourth year. We discuss several cases, including the step potential and the potential barrier.
We investigate the transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon a step potential decrease and a square well. The probabilities of transmission and reflection using the time-independent Schrödinger equation and also the time-dependent Schrödinger equation are in excellent agreement. We explain why the probabilities agree so well. In doing so, we make use of an exact analytical expression for the square well for time-dependent transmission and reflection, which reveals additional interesting and unexpected results. One such result is that transmission of a wave packet can occur with the probability of transmission depending weakly on the initial spread of the packet. The explanations and the additional results will be of interest to instructors of and students in upper year undergraduate quantum mechanics courses.
We investigate the transmission and reflection of a quantum particle incident upon a step potential increase, a step potential decrease, a square well, and a square barrier, all well studied in undergraduate quantum mechanics. We are especially interested in the extreme where the change in the potential is arbitrarily large, but with the difference in the energy of the particle and the potential held fixed, if possible. We obtain the probabilities of transmission and reflection using the time-independent Schrödinger equation and also the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. In the time-dependent case, we have the particle initially in a Gaussian wave packet or a similar localized state. We obtain results that fall into three categories: results that are not surprising, results where time-dependent and time-independent agree surprisingly well, and results that are very different. We discuss the unexpected results. Our work may be of interest to instructors of and students in upper year undergraduate quantum mechanics courses.
In this paper, the results of the analysis of the 1-dimensional potential barrier case are presented when the energy of the incident beam is equal to the potential of the system (𝐸 = 𝑉 0 ).The analysis was carried out using a computational simulation based on Python programming by reviewing the values of the reflection and transmission coefficients and their influence on the amplitude of the wave function.As an example case for simulation, the potential value of the system 𝑉 0 = 60 × 10 -39 J is taken.First, an approach is made when the system energy E approaches the potential 𝑉 0 from below (𝐸 ≲ 𝑉 0 ), then an approach is made when the system energy E approaches the potential 𝑉 0 from above (𝐸 ≳ 𝑉 0 ).From these two approaches, the result is that for both the 𝐸 ≲ 𝑉 0 and 𝐸 ≳ 𝑉 0 cases, the graph shape is almost the same with slightly different amplitudes.The amplitude for the system with 𝐸 = 61 × 10 -39 J is larger than for the system 𝐸 = 59 × 10 -39 J.An important event is that when the energy of the incident beam is equal to the potential of the system (𝐸 = 𝑉 0 ), the reflection and transmission coefficient values are undefined so that no amplitude appears in the visualization of the programming results.Thus, it is impossible to obtain information about the particle beam in the potential region 𝑉 0 .
In the propagation of an electron through a one-dimensional asymmetric complex potential, it is known that while the conventional Green function reciprocity symmetry will ensure transmission to be symmetric between a “left-incident” and a “right-incident” beam, no such symmetry exists for the case of reflection. Here we derive generalized reciprocity relations for both the amplitude and phase of the reflected waves as constraints on the left- and right-incident beams, in complete analogy to what was established in optics. We further provide illustrations of these relations via direct analytical calculations in the case of a real potential, and via numerical studies in the case of a complex potential.
In previous studies, by the methods of wave mechanics, of one-dimensional motion of particles in cases in which there are intervals in which the value of the potential energy function V(x)V(x)V(x) exceeds the value of the total energy EEE, attention has been confined to wave functions of the form $f(x, E)\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}\frac{2\ensuremath{\pi}\mathrm{iEt}}{h})$. In the present note wave packets are considered, instead of these trains of waves.The function V(x)V(x)V(x) is taken as follows: V(x),=0forx<0andforx>a,=V0>0for0<x<a.{V(x),=0 \mathrm{for} x<0 \mathrm{and}\mathrm{for} x>a,}{={V}_{0}>0 \mathrm{for} 0<x<a.}V(x),=0forx<0andforx>a,=V0​>0for0<x<a. A wave function is set up which initially represents a wave packet moving toward the point x=0x=0x=0 from the left. The separation of the incident packet into a reflected packet and a transmitted packet is studied. It is found that the transmitted packet appears at the point x=ax=ax=a at about the time at which the incident packet reaches the point x=0x=0x=0, so that there is no appreciable delay in the transmission of the packet through the barrier.