Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Potential roughness suppression in microwave chip traps

Shuangli Du, Andrew P. Rotunno, Kameron Sullivan, S. Aubin

Published May 30, 2019• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Microwave Forces and Potentials with Atom Chips

S. Aubin

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Nov 20, 2015•0 citations

Microwave and RF micro-traps

S. Aubin, Austin R. Ziltz

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 15, 2011•0 citations

Suppression of potential roughness in atom-chip ac Zeeman traps

Shuangli Du, Austin R. Ziltz, William Miyahira +1 more

We present several toy models for predicting the character and strength of the roughness of ac Zeeman trapping potentials generated by imperfections in wire traces on an atom chip. An ac Zeeman trapping potential is generated by targeting a microwave or rf magnetic field at hyperfine or Zeeman ground-state transitions, respectively, while a dc Zeeman trap uses a static magnetic field to manipulate an atom via its magnetic moment. We find that an ac Zeeman trap suppresses potential roughness by several orders of magnitude with respect to a comparable dc Zeeman trap. This suppression stems from the inherent differences between an atom's response to dc and ac (namely rf and microwave) magnetic fields, in concert with how the ac skin effect smooths out a current distribution disturbed by a conductivity variation. For chip wires fabricated by evaporation, we find that an ac Zeeman trap for $^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$ atoms, located $100\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ from the chip and operating on a 6.8 GHz hyperfine transition, is expected to suppress potential roughness by a factor of $4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{5}$ compared with a similar dc Zeeman trap. For a comparable ac Zeeman trap operating on a 10 MHz Zeeman transition, the suppression is $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}$. Conversely, the ac skin effect also slightly exacerbates potential roughness, in ac Zeeman traps, from defects in the sidewall of a wire trace.

Physical Review A•May 31, 2022•4 citations

Potential Roughness Suppression in a Radio-Frequency AC Zeeman Chip Trap

William Miyahira, S. Aubin

We present work showing potential roughness suppression in an AC Zeeman atom chip trap operating on RF Zeeman transitions. RF trap roughness is compared with a DC trap with clear suppression in the RF trap.

Frontiers in Optics•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Reducing Microwave Absorption with Chaotic Microwaves

J. Qin, Alfred W. Hubler

Lecture notes in networks and systems•Jan 1, 2017•1 citation

Chaos in Microwave Resonators

H.‐J. Stöckmann

Progress in mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2013•8 citations
We present several toy models for predicting the character and strength of the roughness of ac Zeeman trapping potentials generated by imperfections in wire traces on an atom chip. An ac Zeeman trapping potential is generated by targeting a microwave or rf magnetic field at hyperfine or Zeeman ground-state transitions, respectively, while a dc Zeeman trap uses a static magnetic field to manipulate an atom via its magnetic moment. We find that an ac Zeeman trap suppresses potential roughness by several orders of magnitude with respect to a comparable dc Zeeman trap. This suppression stems from the inherent differences between an atom's response to dc and ac (namely rf and microwave) magnetic fields, in concert with how the ac skin effect smooths out a current distribution disturbed by a conductivity variation. For chip wires fabricated by evaporation, we find that an ac Zeeman trap for 87Rb^{87}\mathrm{Rb}87Rb atoms, located $100\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ from the chip and operating on a 6.8 GHz hyperfine transition, is expected to suppress potential roughness by a factor of $4\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{5}$ compared with a similar dc Zeeman trap. For a comparable ac Zeeman trap operating on a 10 MHz Zeeman transition, the suppression is $2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{4}$. Conversely, the ac skin effect also slightly exacerbates potential roughness, in ac Zeeman traps, from defects in the sidewall of a wire trace.