Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Improving the precision of quantum metrology using quantum error correction

John P. Preskill

Published May 29, 2019• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Error-corrected quantum metrology

Sisi Zhou

•Jan 10, 2022•1 citation

Quantum Error Correction for Metrology

Fedor Jelezko

•Apr 5, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction for Metrology

Alexander O. Sushkov, E. M. Kessler, Igor Lovchinsky +1 more

APS•May 1, 2014•0 citations

Continuous error correction for quantum metrology

Shengshi Pang, Yi-Cong Zheng, Todd A. Brun +1 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 6, 2019•0 citations

Complementing Quantum Error Correction in Quantum Metrology via Swap Test

Xiaodie Lin, Linxuan Li, Haidong Yuan

The precision and sensitivity achievable in quantum metrology are often compromised by the presence of noise. While quantum error correction has emerged as a promising strategy, it is ineffective in addressing noise that is indistinguishable from the signal. To address this challenge, virtual state purification was introduced as a complementary approach to quantum error correction. However, significant noise accumulation can impede its performance. To overcome this limitation, we propose a swap test-based method specifically designed to address indistinguishable noise, even under high noise levels. A systematic error-scaling analysis demonstrates that this method enables quantum-enhanced precision in certain scenarios. Furthermore, numerical simulations demonstrate that our method surpasses virtual state purification in both single- and multi-parameter estimation tasks. The significant improvements in precision across diverse settings underscore the robustness and practicality of our method for real-world applications.

quant-pharXiv:2605.23792•May 25, 2026•0 citations

Practical limits of error correction for quantum metrology

Nathan Shettell, William J. Munro, Damian Markham +1 more

Abstract Noise is the greatest obstacle in quantum metrology that limits it achievable precision and sensitivity. There are many techniques to mitigate the effect of noise, but this can never be done completely. One commonly proposed technique is to repeatedly apply quantum error correction. Unfortunately, the required repetition frequency needed to recover the Heisenberg limit is unachievable with the existing quantum technologies. In this article we explore the discrete application of quantum error correction with current technological limitations in mind. We establish that quantum error correction can be beneficial and highlight the factors which need to be improved so one can reliably reach the Heisenberg limit level precision.

arXiv:2101.02823•New Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 2021•23 citations
The precision and sensitivity achievable in quantum metrology are often compromised by the presence of noise. While quantum error correction has emerged as a promising strategy, it is ineffective in addressing noise that is indistinguishable from the signal. To address this challenge, virtual state purification was introduced as a complementary approach to quantum error correction. However, significant noise accumulation can impede its performance. To overcome this limitation, we propose a swap test-based method specifically designed to address indistinguishable noise, even under high noise levels. A systematic error-scaling analysis demonstrates that this method enables quantum-enhanced precision in certain scenarios. Furthermore, numerical simulations demonstrate that our method surpasses virtual state purification in both single- and multi-parameter estimation tasks. The significant improvements in precision across diverse settings underscore the robustness and practicality of our method for real-world applications.
Abstract Noise is the greatest obstacle in quantum metrology that limits it achievable precision and sensitivity. There are many techniques to mitigate the effect of noise, but this can never be done completely. One commonly proposed technique is to repeatedly apply quantum error correction. Unfortunately, the required repetition frequency needed to recover the Heisenberg limit is unachievable with the existing quantum technologies. In this article we explore the discrete application of quantum error correction with current technological limitations in mind. We establish that quantum error correction can be beneficial and highlight the factors which need to be improved so one can reliably reach the Heisenberg limit level precision.